Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Winning the Latino Vote: If the Democrats have the winning formula, why not copy them?
National Review ^ | 11/27/2012 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 11/27/2012 7:21:57 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Over the last three weeks, I think I have read most of the post-election op-eds written on the Latino vote. I have studied exit polling, read sophisticated demographic analyses, and talked to as many Latinos in my hometown as I could. The result is that I would not advise Republicans to go down the identity-politics route. I don’t wish to live in an America where Steve Lara or Bob Martinez is reduced to an anonymous “Latino” and Victor Hanson is just a “white male.”

But if Republicans really believe there is a monolithic Latino vote, and if those of Hispanic descent are easily definable and vote predictably en masse and along tribal lines rather than as individuals, then perhaps Republican pundits and operatives hell-bent on wining the Latino vote might consider the following — not entirely unserious — recommendations.

1. Family values. I didn’t sense a big upsurge among Latinos that I know for Rick Santorum and his religious-based agenda. The Catholicism of Santorum or of Newt Gingrich had little resonance. Abortion, gay marriage, and ending “Don’t ask, don’t tell” seemed mostly non-issues. Nor do I gather that Latinos in central California vote on the basis of family values any more than do non-Latinos. Mike Huckabee’s family populism would win few adherents. In terms of divorce, illegitimacy, crime, and high-school-graduation rates, there are few statistical differences that reflect any ethnic patterns. Family values in the Latino community may be defined somewhat differently from the way elite Republican consultants imagine, perhaps more along the ancient Spanish notion of a patron/client relationship that ultimately originated in Rome.

In our time, the patron is seen as the big and powerful federal government, which has an obligation to care for its less-well-off and unfortunately all-too-often-dependent and oppressed clients, who in turn will vote in thanks for state help with food, shelter, education, and health care. The patron of the classical hacienda protects the client against outlaws and oppressive forces — in this case supposedly rich old white guys (see Obama’s “punish our enemies”), who are not sensitive to the needs of a victimized “other.” If Republicans wish to win on this more European and statist notion of family values, then I would suggest trying to expand food stamps, add more coverage to Obamacare, and forgive delinquent mortgages, student loans, and small-business loans. The key would be to fashion a family-values platform that worries more about the collective familia than the more individualist and stereotypically Anglo-Saxon agendas of the well-off. High taxes and generous redistributionist spending are far more a mark of family values than is being against abortion or for traditional marriage.

2. Immigration. The DREAM Act, as La Raza activists have argued, is the beginning, not the end, of needed amnesties. To win the Latino vote on this issue, I suggest stopping all the talk of reforming legal immigration, especially the elitist notion that all immigration must be “legal” or, worse yet, predicated on skill sets, education, a knowledge of English, and capital. All such criteria are interpreted as mere cover for the prejudicial and discriminatory, since they tend to favor advantaged Europeans or Asians at the expense of disadvantaged Latinos. As a friend said to me, “It’s our turn; you had enough people come here from Europe.” Better yet, as I read La Raza literature, Republicans might consider dropping altogether the obsession with a “border” that discriminates against indigenous folk on both sides of the current artificially constructed line. They should accept the undeniable fact that there is a Mexico and an America — but also something new and unique in between, developing within the 200 miles north and south of the Rio Grande. I think support for a blanket amnesty for 11 million unlawful immigrants and an end to the fixation on border “security” might seriously help Republicans with Latinos. And it is high time that conservatives stop demanding that we complete that silly border fence; perhaps they should even call for dismantling that anachronism once and for all.

3. Affirmative action and diversity. I would put emphasis on the salad bowl and forget the archaic and now mythical melting pot. The more hyphenated names, newly acquired accent marks, and trilled Rs the better. There should be hundreds of Republican Latino-American and Republican Viva la Raza committees. It also would be wise to stop the nativist fringe nonsense about English as the official national language. Instead, conservatives should welcome bilingualism in the schools and encourage simultaneous Spanish-language translation at their conventions and campaign stops. The way of the future is multilingual ballots, government forms, and IDs that do not seek to privilege one tradition over another.

4. State spending. Republicans are apparently unaware that their mantra of smaller government is a dog whistle for cutting state spending and employment for the less-well-off. Yet many first-generation Latino-Americans rightly see government employment — the post office, the DMV, the county offices, the schools — as an important bridge into the middle class. When Republicans talk of cutting spending, Latinos feel targeted. Why cut the hours of a DMV employee so that a grandee in Atherton has low enough taxes to afford a third Mercedes? To win the Latino vote, conservatives have to concede bigger deficits, higher social spending, and more government employment. They should examine very carefully the demographics of Jerry Brown’s winning campaign to pass Proposition 30, which just ensured that California will have the highest taxes in the nation and will be able to continue to provide the most generous welfare support and state-employee compensation packages. (As my same friend put it, “If rich guys want to leave California, well, good riddance.”) If Republicans could fashion something like Prop. 30 on the federal level, they might receive as large a percentage of the Latino vote as did the California ballot initiative. If George W. Bush received a larger Latino vote than did Mitt Romney, perhaps it was not because of his halting Spanish, but because of his compassionate conservatism as embodied in No Child Left Behind, an enhanced unfunded prescription-drug Medicare benefit, and a vast increase in annual deficit spending and the size of the federal government. Note how loudly opposing most of what Bush did led to shrinkage in the Latino vote for Romney in 2012.

5. “Them.” Barack Obama brilliantly and cynically created a loose coalition of those with grievances against the supposed white male establishment. It did not matter that some members of this coalition were multimillionaire elites like Elizabeth Warren or affluent Chinese-Americans or Cuban-Americans who are the grandkids of those dispossessed by murderous Communists in Havana or Beijing. The Obama administration’s four-year barrage of “my people,” “punish our enemies,” “a nation of cowards,” the Skip Gates pontification, the Trayvon Martin if-I-had-a-son line, Eric Holder’s charges of racism over the Fast and Furious investigation, the whites-in-Hell slurs from Joseph Lowery, who gave the benediction at Obama’s inauguration in 2008, the hyphenated campaign committees, the executive orders, Sandra Fluke, the constant charges of racism by the liberal media, the weekly outraged Black Caucus — all of that insidiously created a climate of socially acceptable anti-old-white-guy feeling that anyone not of that suspect group could buy into — and anyone of that unfortunate group could buy out of by loudly proclaiming his support for Obama.

Is this not a model for capturing more of the Latino vote? If the Republicans could nominate a non-white-male, then he could rally the forces of non-white-maleness and find a majority coalition based on collective grievances. Chinese-Americans would vote with Japanese-Americans. Rich Cubans would vote with poor Oaxacans. Third-generation upper-middle-class Arab-Americans could even join with Jewish-Americans on the rallying cry that they had grievances against “them.” If a conservative Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindal — or better yet, Nikki Haley — could wage such an us/them campaign, where could the white male voter really go?

Short answer: Nowhere.

If what liberals say is true — that the Republican party is rightly lumped together as too white, too old, too male, and too in control — why not, then, have Republicans run a stereotyped class/race/gender campaign against themselves? Why not point to the supposed mess America has become after 238 years, and say, “We think you can do better”?

Why not “Vote for us, because we don’t like ourselves all that much either”?

— NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author, most recently, of The End of Sparta, a novel about ancient freedom.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012electionanalysis; elections; hispanics; hispanicvote; latino; latinovote; vdh

1 posted on 11/27/2012 7:22:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Emulating a collection of losers, is not a “winning strategy”.


2 posted on 11/27/2012 7:23:56 AM PST by carriage_hill (America - a great idea while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WHy not merge teh Republican and Democrat parties into one big political juggernaut?

Americans need never vote again.


3 posted on 11/27/2012 7:24:32 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Many Latinos love Banana republic dictators. This is why they vote democrat.


4 posted on 11/27/2012 7:25:54 AM PST by frogjerk (Obama Claus is coming to town!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It will never work for the GOP because the dems will just keep moving the goal posts to the left. And everyone understands you get more free stuff if you vote for the winner.


5 posted on 11/27/2012 7:28:43 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A few tweaks here and there, and the average ‘Rat would agree with every word of it.


6 posted on 11/27/2012 7:30:09 AM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

VDH is behind the power curve on this. The GOP is already salivating over amnesty and the DREAM act, even in the face of the reality that Hispanics will consistently vote dem 3-1.


7 posted on 11/27/2012 7:32:39 AM PST by TADSLOS (Welcome to the new Plastic Banana Republic- We''ll Make You Feel Good to be Poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
WHy not merge teh Republican and Democrat parties into one big political juggernaut? Americans need never vote again.

It's pretty much a formality now. "Do you want the extreme leftist (D), or the crypto-leftist (R)?"

8 posted on 11/27/2012 7:35:03 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Hanson skillfully demolishes recent calls for "Latino outreach" here, and the problem for the GOP is two fold. Preach small government and liberty and excoriated by the MSM as racists. Start talking like the hypothetical "me too" Republicans in the article and be ridiculed by the MSM as "Too little, too late."

There is no way to win, other than a James T. Kirk "Kobiyashi Maru" scenario - the best of which is for conservatives to register as Democrats en masse and start electing conservative candidates everywhere we can. The Left will never see it coming, and it will take them years of frantic effort to reprogram all the anti-GOP memes they have crammed into their mush-skulled adherents.

9 posted on 11/27/2012 7:41:04 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Republicans do not understand they cannot out-democrat the Democrats.

If the Pubbies run with a “chicken in every pot” the Dems will run for two or three in every pot and then excoriate the Pubbies for being so mean that the one chicken is not enough. You can never win that way.

Like Rush has stated over and over; if you run a real conservative and espouse conservative values you win. History has proved it.

The RNC is full of rich liberals who look down on the citizens of the US with disdain and have as much contempt for us as the Dems.

10 posted on 11/27/2012 7:44:00 AM PST by OldMissileer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here in Virginia, Bob McDonnell did well with Hispanics (40%+) during his gubernatorial campaign in 2009 by speaking to the expansion of businesses and jobs. Rarely did the subject of immigration ever come up. Whoever wants to win these people over in a future election should hire the Governor’s campaign team. Like increasing numbers of Americans, most Hispanics prefer big, powerful government entities standing over them, but GOPers can slice off larger shares of their voting populace with McDonnell’s approach.


11 posted on 11/27/2012 7:50:56 AM PST by ScottinVA (I've never been more disgusted with American voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Back in the 70’s way before Hispanics and immigration was an issue, a cousin of mine told me something like(emphasize like, wish I remembered exactly, she is now gone)that it is impossible to translate our founding documents into Spanish as there is no comparable language or concepts. She was hardly anti-anything, ignorant or bigoted. She and her family often hosted exchange students from Latin America, she taught English to Spanish-speaking immigrants and travels much in Latin America.


12 posted on 11/27/2012 7:50:56 AM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Corruption and national “giving in” suicide, the “winning” fluke formula.

Give them a welfare pacifier and buy a whole lot of free speech shutting in exchange for giving latex taste in her mouth.


13 posted on 11/27/2012 7:51:57 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
GOPers can slice off larger shares of their voting populace with McDonnell’s approach.

I don't disagree, but didn't he have the advantage of running in an off year election which didn't have the disadvantage of bringing out legions of zombie and brainless voters to support their false Messiah?

14 posted on 11/27/2012 7:57:51 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

I am Hispanic from the Midwest. most Hispanics live conservative and vote liberal like many white families. it goes back to JFK. I remember visiting Hispanic homes in the 60 s and 70s and seeing JFKs picture on the wall. He was the first Catholic prez. Many black evangelical blacks voted because BO is black. I remember seeing Steve Harvey (u can probably find it on YouTube) in 2008 and he said that he didn’t care what BO did, he was going to vote for him because he was black. I think it is all about emotions and feelings. It sounds compassionate, when you say you want to help people, feed them give the working families something. I know the argument, “ you show compassion by giving people a job” and not handouts. Americans have become like woman (I bet that 90% of Freepers are men) and they vote because it sounds good, clean air, free medical, food stamps. The libs care about people, that is the perception. The GOP will never win until they can show compassion and sell economic growth as compassion. We need to take back the educational system first. Where are the GOP statesmen, going out and selling their views. You can’t compete with Oprah and daytime TV. You all are going to think that this is crazy but I think Sarah Palin show have a daytime talk show like Oprah. It would do more to sell conservative values than any office. Fight fire with fire.


15 posted on 11/27/2012 8:16:35 AM PST by cromero (Lead, Follow or Get out of the Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
"... latex taste in her mouth."

A whole new line of Blow-Pops® suckers?

16 posted on 11/27/2012 8:16:35 AM PST by carriage_hill (America - a great idea while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer
Like Rush has stated over and over; if you run a real conservative and espouse conservative values you win. History has proved it.

Visit this thread and view Tea-Party conservative Steve Pearce's win in NM-2, a district with only 34% Republican registration. He won with over 59% of the total vote.

Martinez, Pearce: How To Win Hispanic Votes (NM)

17 posted on 11/27/2012 8:17:56 AM PST by CedarDave (Presstitutes: Journalists who refuse to ask hard questions and who report by omission or distortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

>>Why not merge teh Republican and Democrat parties into one big political juggernaut?

>>Americans need never vote again.

They are working on it, day by day.


18 posted on 11/27/2012 8:18:02 AM PST by Only1choice____Freedom (As long as America's tolerence of failure is not overwhelmed by a desire to succeed, we will fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Having the media lie by saying your opponents and their policies are all racist is not a strategy that is available to us.


19 posted on 11/27/2012 8:18:03 AM PST by Gil4 (Progressives - Trying to repeal the Law of Supply and Demand since 1848)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is this kind of what it was like on the Titanic? Listening to the music,dancing and having a gay ol’ time.


20 posted on 11/27/2012 8:22:25 AM PST by Leep (Are you smarter than a 7th grade math student and or Barack 0bama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

When the losers have been cleaning your clock, who’s the collection of losers then?


21 posted on 11/27/2012 8:28:51 AM PST by newzjunkey (revue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leep

I don’t think the captain intentionally rammed the iceberg.


22 posted on 11/27/2012 8:36:18 AM PST by Gil4 (Progressives - Trying to repeal the Law of Supply and Demand since 1848)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

As long as you’re still taking the high road, they’re still the losers. At a certain point, when the population can’t be converted to rational though and actions, the nation’s gone. We might just be there, or very close to it.


23 posted on 11/27/2012 8:45:01 AM PST by carriage_hill (America - a great idea while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
WHy not merge teh Republican and Democrat parties into one big political juggernaut?

It's been done.

24 posted on 11/27/2012 9:28:24 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Politics is about the art of winning. But one must define what "winning" means. Among rational people, it can never mean simply electing people with a certain political label, regardless of what they stand for.

There can be no "winning," if it is at the price of the ethnic heritage of the mainstream American. We need to eliminate any such approach from our consideration--it is not worthy of the wonderful heritage that we have been losing.

William Flax

25 posted on 11/27/2012 9:45:13 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Politics is about the art of winning. But one must define what "winning" means. Among rational people, it can never mean simply electing people with a certain political label, regardless of what they stand for.

There can be no "winning," if it is at the price of the ethnic heritage of the mainstream American. We need to eliminate any such approach from our consideration--it is not worthy of the wonderful heritage that we have been losing.

William Flax

26 posted on 11/27/2012 9:45:27 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


27 posted on 11/27/2012 10:07:12 AM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cromero

I do not think you are crazy at all. Emotions trumps logic every time with the uneducated voter. I have been saying much the same as you in my posts.

I had mentioned Dennis Miller as someone who could connect with the voters we are not attracting now. He is conservativve, articulate and funny and is quick and glib on the late night shows. He also has kind of a latino look about him and can jive talk. What else do you need to win the presidency anymore?

Our problem is we vote for principled conservatives. Would we vote for a candidate who has mass appeal but not as solid on the issues as we would like?

In other words would we ‘wink-wink’ vote for a sock puppet on the right just like Obummer was the sock puppet for the left?


28 posted on 11/27/2012 11:10:38 AM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gil4

I don’t think the captain intentionally rammed the iceberg.


Not intentionally but they thought it was unsinkable.
After it rammed most of the elite had a seat on the rafts.


29 posted on 11/27/2012 11:52:46 AM PST by Leep (Are you smarter than a 7th grade math student and or Barack 0bama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Leep

“Not intentionally but they thought it was unsinkable.”

I think you’re being too charitable to the current captain of our Titanic.


30 posted on 11/27/2012 2:07:53 PM PST by Gil4 (Progressives - Trying to repeal the Law of Supply and Demand since 1848)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

BTTT


31 posted on 11/27/2012 6:04:46 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

AH, it’s what they call feminist sexual independence from “men”.


32 posted on 11/29/2012 1:57:54 PM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson