Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House blasts Republican ‘obsession’ with Rice and Benghazi
Yahoo! News ^ | Nov. 27, 2012 | Olivier Knox

Posted on 11/27/2012 4:21:20 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

The White House sharply escalated its attacks Tuesday on Republicans trying to stop Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice from succeeding Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state. Press secretary Jay Carney described GOP lawmakers as being gripped by a politically fueled "obsession" with a series of television appearances Rice made shortly after the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, in which she wrongly suggested the attack had stemmed from a demonstration over an anti-Muslim video rather than a terrorist assault.

Carney's comments came after Rice met privately on Capitol Hill with Republican senators who have said they intend to block her nomination if President Barack Obama chooses her to replace Clinton as the nation's top diplomat. Rice also acknowledged for the first time, in a written statement issued by her office, that her initial public comments on the Benghazi assault were wrong because there had been no protest outside the compound.

Carney said the U.S. still does not know who carried out the assault, which claimed the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. But he said GOP focus on Rice's early statements was a politically motivated distraction from efforts to identify those responsible for the killings.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; carneybenghazi; christopherstevens; jaycarney; susanrice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
I think Rice is fair game. She was a willing dupe, at best.

But, the Benghazi complainers are cowards for not criticizing Obama, who touted the very same “video lie” as Rice several times in public.

41 posted on 11/27/2012 6:13:09 PM PST by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Haven’t we had enough of affirmnative action bureaucrats? As a nation, a society, and a culture we have been on greased skids to at best mediocrity, but most likely collapse because of the insanity of affirmative action and the horror of political correctness it spawned.


42 posted on 11/27/2012 6:18:18 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
White House blasts Republican ‘obsession’ with Rice and Benghazi

Not the headline we'd see if it was the Bush White House and Condi Rice. It would all be about cover up, misinformation, questions about competence...

43 posted on 11/27/2012 6:44:36 PM PST by newzjunkey (roo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I’d much rather see her hanging around with people like Tom Coburn and Marco Rubio (for instance) than Grahamnesty and McLame.


44 posted on 11/27/2012 6:46:20 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Republicans are idiots. They should be talking about Rice advancing a White House orchestrated lie. They need to use the word lie and to pin the blame on the building, not the messiah. And they need to continue this line of explanation every time the little spokesperson tries to deflect.


45 posted on 11/27/2012 6:47:42 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge

Yes, we are obsessed with the Benghazi thing just like the media was with that terrible scandal about a crime that was never committed: the Valerie Plame one, that is. Remember when that was on the front page of the NYTimes and every other media outlet? Remember how outraged the libs were?


46 posted on 11/27/2012 7:11:19 PM PST by NotTallTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Impeachment File for Benghazi-Coward Obama.


47 posted on 11/27/2012 7:39:12 PM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
exactly what I think. It's precisely why he immediately came out and said, "Oh, yeah, keep it up and I will nominate her for SOS". This is the exact reaction he wanted and the focus is precisely off wherever he wants it off from.

Republicans...dumb. Sometimes, I wish I could become a leftist just to see what it would be like to have a team that actually tried to win once in a while because this MO is getting old.

48 posted on 11/27/2012 7:43:50 PM PST by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Sounds like the White House desperately wants to keep the focus on her.”

Yeah; methinks Obama doth protest too much. I’m far more concerned with OBAMA and BENGHAZI - why he was too busy farting around raising campaign money to SEND HELP to those people at Benghazi. Over SEVEN HOURS they pleaded. WHERE WAS OBAMA?


49 posted on 11/27/2012 8:11:45 PM PST by Twinkie (ABORTION is GENOCIDE of Blacks & Hispanics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
It's an obsession with the first deal ambassador in 30 years. Why is that so hard for the White House to understand?

-PJ

50 posted on 11/27/2012 8:14:30 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Where was O when the SHTF? Why no fotos from the sit room? Who gave order to stand down? Someone knows.....


51 posted on 11/27/2012 8:17:56 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Where was O when the SHTF? Why no fotos from the sit room? Who gave order to stand down? Someone knows.....


52 posted on 11/27/2012 8:18:12 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

53 posted on 11/27/2012 8:21:23 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

As the Bizarro World Turns.

Why did Nixon resign again? Oh yeah, he was a Republican.

Nice to know there are at least 64 Million American Citizens, (well most of them are Citizens I think) who have no problem with any of this crap. Our Society is doomed.


54 posted on 11/27/2012 8:21:37 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Looks like my Father was wrong, somebody else DOES owe you a living...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax

55 posted on 11/27/2012 8:23:01 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
as I remember from ancient history, Nixon was about to be impeached because he covered up evidence in a breakin in an office building housing an office of the Democrat party.

I don't think there was a broken fingernail even among the perps. Here we have an assault on an American counsulate, 4 dead Americans including an ambassador, a U.N. ambassador and the entire administration lying about it.....and it is described as a "bump in the road."

56 posted on 11/27/2012 8:23:49 PM PST by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax

57 posted on 11/27/2012 8:25:04 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: timestax

58 posted on 11/27/2012 8:26:19 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: timestax

59 posted on 11/27/2012 8:27:30 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: timestax

60 posted on 11/27/2012 8:29:21 PM PST by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson