Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Republicans, The Democrats And Grover
Townhall.com ^ | November 29, 2012 | Emmett Tyrrell

Posted on 11/29/2012 8:54:29 AM PST by Kaslin

Washington -- What is a Republican elected official? A Republican elected official is one who says, "I won't raise my constituents' taxes." Asked to elaborate, the Republican elected official explains, "I will keep taxes down to allow the economy to grow and to throw off ever more tax revenue." The Republican believes that the way to pay for government is to let the economy roar ... and to keep spending reasonable.

What is a Democratic elected official? Back in the early 1960s a Democratic elected official, at least when it came to growing the economy, was not much different from a Republican. President John F. Kennedy called for a tax cut to fire up the economy. Things are different now. A Democratic elected official today is a crafty pol whose economic theories are, at best, muzzy-headed. The Democrats have supposedly embraced the middle class. That is, as the mathematician Senator Patty Murray of Washington said on National Public Radio the other day, "98 percent" of the American people. The Democrats promise not to raise taxes on this middle class. They will only raise them on the top two percent, who are mostly scoundrels anyway, and the economy will grow, and all will be well.

One trillion dollars in budget deficits will continue for the next four years, but everyone will be happy. Medicare will continue to pay out. Medicaid and Social Security will continue to pay out. All the lesser entitlement programs will flourish. If we need more money, the Democrats will hit the upper two percent even harder. You wondered where the goose that laid the golden egg might be? Well, for Democrats it is to be found among that two percent. They really believe that all America is with them, save for this fat and lazy two percent.

Back in the days when such geniuses as President Barack Obama held such hope for the Occupy movement -- those days were not long ago -- the members of that movement and their supporters spoke of the 98 percent of Americans that were supposedly full of hope for the movement. Patty Murray was not the only one to speak of the opulent two percent and the nearly desperate 98 percent. Much of the Democratic Party did also as they embraced us, us 98 percent of Americans who are middle class -- not working class, not upper-middle class, not working poor, or the poor. We are all middle class, except that dratted two percent, and we shall never have a tax increase brought down on us by the Democrats. They promise! Yippee! And if you believe the two percent can pay off the Prophet Obama's twenty-trillion-dollar national debt when he leaves office, you are an ignoramus.

Now comes upon this happy scene of Republicans holding the line on raising taxes and of Democrats talking gibberish about their preposterous 98 percent of Americans all luxuriating in trillion-dollar budgetary overruns, one Grover Norquist. He is a pleasant barbigerous man of sunny disposition given to homespun truths such as "You can either reform government so that it spends less and works better, or you can raise taxes to keep doing all the things we have been doing that haven't worked very well." Conservatives adore him and many independents do too. There are many reasons to adore Grover. He is optimistic, commonsensical, a friend to all Americans who love their freedoms as secured for them in the Constitution. Moreover, he is adamantly opposed to tax increases. He is the author of the tax pledge that, 20 years ago, his organization, Americans for Tax Reform, began asking Capitol Hill politicians to sign. Most Republicans have and by doing so they have distinguished themselves from the Democrats of whom only one has signed the pledge.

Once again -- remember attack dog Joe Biden's assault on him in the vice presidential debate -- Grover is being made out to be a monster, a tyrant forcing congressional Republicans to stand by their pledge not to raise taxes. Actually he has said in his homespun vernacular, "If you want to go to your voters and say I promised you this, and I'm breaking my promise, you can have that conversation," but "You're not having an argument with me. You've made a commitment to your voters." My guess is that most Republicans will stand by their pledge. They know opposition to tax increases is one of the things that makes them Republicans and that in two more years will continue the Republicans' domination of government.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; grovernorquist; republicans; taxes

1 posted on 11/29/2012 8:54:34 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Grover Norquist is for Grover Norquist.

Tyrrell has jumped the shark.

2 posted on 11/29/2012 9:04:43 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Grover Norquist is for Grover Norquist.

Tyrrell has jumped the shark.

3 posted on 11/29/2012 9:05:00 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

At least you haven’t called him an Islamofascist.......yet.


4 posted on 11/29/2012 9:43:10 AM PST by Daveinyork (."Trusting government with power and money is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That is, as the mathematician Senator Patty Murray of Washington said on National Public Radio the other day, "98 percent" of the American people. The Democrats promise not to raise taxes on this middle class. They will only raise them on the top two percent, who are mostly scoundrels anyway, and the economy will grow, and all will be well.

I live in Washington. Murray is elected by the 6 or 7 populated Westside counties (out of 39) that are rabid democrats.

She, like the rest of the D's are in the 2% she mentions.

Let it be known that she is decidedly mentally challenged to the extreme, but give her due, she is a good party hack.

5 posted on 11/29/2012 10:13:07 AM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Do you know either one of these people? If not, where do you get your information to inform your conclusions? I happen to know them both.


6 posted on 11/29/2012 10:25:09 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
I listen to them and read what they have written.

I used to like a lot of what Tyrrell wrote himself and the other authors in his magazine.

Not so much anymore.

Norquist has never impressed me as anything but an opportunist. The whole K Street project seemed like a tactic with short term benefits and long term hazard.

7 posted on 11/29/2012 11:55:22 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson