Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sibley files motion to hold Obama in Contempt of Court
AMO PROBOS ^ | November 29, 2012 | MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY

Posted on 11/29/2012 11:15:59 PM PST by ABrit

At the November 29, 2012, Preliminary Injunction hearing in Sibley vs. Alexander, Dinan and Lightfoot – a class action lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court against the three District of Columbia Electors of the so-called Electoral College – Barack Hussein Obama, II, refused to produce his original Short-Form “Certificate of Live Birth” and his original Long-Form “Certificate of Live Birth”. These documents are the sole evidence that Mr. Obama has proffered to the American People to establish his Article II, §1, eligibility for the Office of President. I had subpoenaed those documents for the hearing.  As a result, I today filed my Verified Motion for Rule to Show Cause Why Barack Hussein Obama, II, Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court.  Judge Mott has reserved decision on that motion pending a response by the Defendants.

What exactly is the objection to producing your original birth certificates when subpoenaed?  No objection was filed by Mr. Obama or his attorneys.

(Excerpt) Read more at amoprobos.blogspot.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certificate; certifigate; contempt; naturalborncitizen; nbc; nhaturalborncitizen; obama
Another refusal to produce Obamas "birth certificates" in evidence.
1 posted on 11/29/2012 11:16:01 PM PST by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ABrit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2LwnmbdiTg&feature=em-share_video_user


2 posted on 11/29/2012 11:33:03 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe; ABrit

Uhm.....So?

/S


3 posted on 11/30/2012 12:11:02 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

The law of the land does not apply to Obama. He’s a foreigner.


4 posted on 11/30/2012 12:16:06 AM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABrit
Congress should DEMAND Hawaii present 0bama's ORIGINAL BIRTH RECORDS. He stole deceased baby Virginia Sunahara's bc and called it his own. Aug. 4th, 1961 isn't even his real birth date. Hawaii will not allow Virginia's living brother Duncan to see her original birth records because Hawaii says "0bama's records might get torn in the process". B.S.
5 posted on 11/30/2012 12:45:44 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Indonesian Go Home!

6 posted on 11/30/2012 2:08:00 AM PST by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ABrit
From the linked blog post:

Everyone else in these United States has to follow the law and prove -- as required by 8 USCS § 1324a -- that they are legally entitled to work before beginning a job. Why does Mr. Obama believe he is above that law and can ignore it?

Read the statute you cite. Under 8 USC § 1324a(b)(1)(B)(i), acceptable proof is a U.S. passport, which Obama certainly has.

This statute is not about the NBC requirement. As its title ("Unlawful employment of aliens") indicates, it's part of the employment verification system, aimed at aliens who don't have work authorization. Under 8 USC § 1324a(b)(1)(B)(ii), even a green card is acceptable proof.
7 posted on 11/30/2012 2:48:07 AM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

I hope they are successful. I am so looking forward to President Biden.


8 posted on 11/30/2012 3:35:41 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABrit; butterdezillion

PING


9 posted on 11/30/2012 4:11:23 AM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten
Read the statute you cite. Under 8 USC § 1324a(b)(1)(B)(i), acceptable proof is a U.S. passport, which Obama certainly has.

And whose name is on the passport? Is it Barry Soetero? Did Obama ever legally change his name?

10 posted on 11/30/2012 4:13:50 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

Don’t these people know that we live in a democracy and the people have spoken?

The people want Obama as President, and the money from the top 2%. They voted as much, so the courts should stand down, like the Marines in Sigonella during the Benghazi terror attack by al qaeda.

(/sarcasm & /MSM talking points)


11 posted on 11/30/2012 4:59:13 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

He has no proof.


12 posted on 11/30/2012 5:00:50 AM PST by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; null and void; LucyT; Nachum; bitt

PING!


13 posted on 11/30/2012 6:03:14 AM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

Natural Born Citizen bttt!


14 posted on 11/30/2012 9:01:40 AM PST by Perseverando (Gun control? It's the OBOTS who are filling up prisons for violent crimes, not the Tea Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Hawaii will not allow Virginia's living brother Duncan to see her original birth records because Hawaii says "0bama's records might get torn in the process"

HUH?????

More info please ....

15 posted on 11/30/2012 9:11:46 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robe
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/09/hawaii-recap.html

It's pretty clear that the State of Hawaii FABRICATED a birth certificate for Virginia Sunahara long after 0bama stole hers to use as his own. Her bc # is WAY out of sequence.. I do not believe Aug. 4th, 1961 is even 0bama's real birth date; It's Virginia's but not his.

16 posted on 11/30/2012 9:40:40 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Robe
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/arpaio-investigator-hawaii-still-covering-up-for-obama/

"So, Nagamine concludes, Duncan Sunahara should be satisfied with the short-form certificate of live birth the Department of Health issued for his sister, even though it is a modern computer-generated form, not a certified exact copy of the original:

If everybody was getting [a copy of the long-form birth certificate], those days of copies like they did in the old days, the records could not be preserved safely, the pages would be torn, they could not be protected. So the fact that all of this data is computerized, they can get the data. The law means that this data is as good as the original. Plaintiff got the birth certificate, he knows his sister was born. To there – there – it would be very, very burdensome.

Judge Nishimura denied Duncan Sunahara’s request, agreeing with Nagamine."

Congress should DEMAND that Hawaii present 0bama's ORIGINAL birth records. Nancy Pelosi is also involved in this cover-up, but that's another long story..

17 posted on 11/30/2012 9:48:33 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ABrit
The Obama legal team has claimed to possess both SFBC and LFBCs for Barry and even asked judges to “take legal notice” of these “original” BCs (certified images) in numerous federal and state courts. Yet they are a no-show with these BCs in DC just down the street from the White House.

Remember that at the presser when Barry's lawyer was asked point-blank whether Barry would be holding the physical “original” certified LFBC so as to reduce scepticism over whether it was genuine, the lawyer said No he will NOT be holding it! That can only be interpreted as preserving “plausible deniability” (actually implausible deniability) of any physical connection between Barry and the BC, should forgery be subsequently prosecuted. “Barry never came in physical contact with the allegedly forged BC so he couldn't have forged it.”

18 posted on 11/30/2012 11:26:31 AM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Obama’s lawyers have never produced any birth certificate evidence in Court. If they had they would have been subject to and failed expert examination, and the Obama would be open to charges of perjury


19 posted on 11/30/2012 12:10:42 PM PST by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ABrit; advertising guy
“Obama’s lawyers have never produced any birth certificate evidence in Court.”

This is the very dirty secret, obvious to anyone with legal knowledge. All lawyers, LEOs and prosecutors are sworn to defend the Constitution and should have their hair on fire, but noooo! Crickets, except for Arpaio!

20 posted on 11/30/2012 2:55:46 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Obama’s lawyers have previously tried to rely on the “public record,” but the burden of proof was shifted in the Kansas ballot challenge by showing that the public record includes a 1991 bio that says Obama was born in Kenya, that Obama’s wife called Kenya her husband’s home country and that his Kenyan step-grandmother said he passed through her hands when he was born, etc. Further, Obama’s lawyers tried to rely on the 14th amendment to make Obama a natural-born citizen, but the argument wasn’t compelling when it was shown that the Supreme Court made a negative declaration that the 14th amendment does NOT say who shall be natural born citizens in Wong Kim Ark (via Minor v. Happersett).


21 posted on 11/30/2012 9:10:48 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

obumpa


22 posted on 12/01/2012 9:21:30 PM PST by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson