Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/30/2012 2:16:42 PM PST by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: drewh

Huntsman drinks Chinese Kool-Aid, or I could rephrase that into something nasty.

I can’t believe he started speaking Chinese in the primary debate. Like that was supposed to win over conservatives?


2 posted on 11/30/2012 2:19:16 PM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

LOL, Huntsman sees an opening.

John, zip your pants back up and get outa Dodge.

You’re embarrassing yourself.


3 posted on 11/30/2012 2:20:45 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and over 60 million Americans still didn't have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

and the GOP should take his advice because??

He must have gotten massive primary support to have such a voice in the party.

lolz


4 posted on 11/30/2012 2:21:21 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
"What I'm saying about the Benghazi incident is let's lower the politics," Huntsman said. "Let's let the experts collect the information."

The experts did collect the information, and the regime lied about it.

Huntsman should just become a Democrat and get it over with.

5 posted on 11/30/2012 2:22:08 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

..he’s the one who called Romney a “well-lubricated weather vane” in the campaign—a couple of days later, dropped out and supported Romney—what a man of principle...


7 posted on 11/30/2012 2:26:25 PM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
the Republican Party should stress its "libertarian roots"

What Libertarian roots? The Republican Party hasn't had a semblance of respect for the Constitution or limited government since the days of LBJ!

8 posted on 11/30/2012 2:26:49 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Avoid social issues. It wasn’t Republicans who made birth control and abortion free. Not to mention libertarians sat on their prissy hands.


10 posted on 11/30/2012 2:28:51 PM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Why doesn’t he just go skiing with his cousin and stop talking, well both should stop talking.


12 posted on 11/30/2012 2:34:52 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

The GOP should stand by Conservative Principles and not Vote for Rice and let Obama go over the fiscal Cliff.


13 posted on 11/30/2012 2:44:22 PM PST by TNoldman (AN AMERICAN FOR A MUSLIM/BHO FREE AMERICA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

I didn’t realize that John Anderson was still alive.


14 posted on 11/30/2012 2:44:43 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

The only difference between Huntsman and Romney is that Huntsman has access to more money.


16 posted on 11/30/2012 2:49:16 PM PST by Graybeard58 (What G.O.P.e. candidate is in store for us in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

History shows that the Republican Party only loses elections when we do not have a solid social conservative at the top of the ticket, and only wins elections when there is a Bush or Nixon on the ticket.


17 posted on 11/30/2012 2:49:52 PM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Yes, the important thing to be for abortion on demand, including killing babies that are just born, people being able to marry animals if they feel like it, and tolerating decadent culture overall. That’s what ‘s important. (snicker)


18 posted on 11/30/2012 2:50:24 PM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

The thing that always puzzles me is their name, “Libertarians,” because they are not in favor of freedom at all but are very statist and even want state intervention in their favorite causes (which appear to be sex, drugs and rock ‘n roll).

I thought they were such an antiquated bunch that they would have disappeared by now, but they’re still with us. I guess the geriatric hippie crowd (state-supported dope and Viagra) is still with us.


21 posted on 11/30/2012 2:54:10 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Do what you want, GOP. I voted for Romney, despite my distaste for the man and what he stands for, but this is a bridge too far for me. If you think you can win elections without those nasty social issues, then you’d better hope that you can win elections without the nasty social issues voters such as me.


23 posted on 11/30/2012 2:55:56 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

>> should stress its “libertarian roots” rather than “fringe” social issues

The language of a liberal bootlicker.


24 posted on 11/30/2012 2:56:04 PM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

‘Balance the budgets and get out of people’s lives.’

Great line. That should have been pounded into the ground until it because all people associated him with during the campaign. It isn’t like we came close to a social conservative in any case.


25 posted on 11/30/2012 2:57:15 PM PST by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

“Balance the budgets” says absolutely nothing about the size of government, and big government by definition are intrusive in and limiting to people’s lives.


26 posted on 11/30/2012 2:57:30 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
John Huntsman is a no labels marxist.

Jon Huntsman joins bipartisan group

The kind of things "No Labels" support.

No Labels, making the presidency work

1. Regular News Conferences for the President

2. Fast-Track Legislative Authority for The President

3. Make The Parties Pay for Presidential Fundraising

4. A Line Item Veto With A Twist

5. Reduce the Number of Appointees Subject to Senate Confirmation

6. Identify a "Slate That Can't Wait" of Critical Nominees For Expedited Confirmation

7. Up or Down Vote on Presidential Appointment

8. Question Time for The President

9. Expanded Presidential Power to Reorganize

10.Different Opinions, But the Same Facts

11.Regular Meetings Between The President And Congressional Leadership
29 posted on 11/30/2012 3:04:44 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Jon Huntsman? Why won’t she just go away?


39 posted on 11/30/2012 3:57:09 PM PST by Bigg Red (Sorry, Mr. Franklin, I guess we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson