Skip to comments.The Government is Spending $100,000 to Teach Teen Girls "Better Condom Negotiation Tactics"
Posted on 11/30/2012 4:49:48 PM PST by Kaslin
RUSH: From the Washington Examiner: "The administration is funding a $100,000 study of pregnant and 'at-risk' 14- to 17-year-old girls on probation in Houston, Texas, to determine ways to help them choose safer lifestyles and avoid pregnancy, including..." wait for it "...better 'condom negotiation' tactics."
Better condom negotiation tactics.
"The National Institutes of Health, part of the Health and Human Services Department, is providing a University of Houston researcher the money because of the lack of study of female teen juveniles in trouble with the law. The school said the study, 'Choices - Teen: A Bundled Risk Reduction Intervention for Juvenile Justice Females,' will include 30 at-risk girls, ages 14-17, on intensive probation with the Harris County Juvenile Probation Department.
"The goal, said the school, is to determine if intervention programs will help the kids make better life decisions. According to Danielle Parish, the assistant professor at the school's Graduate College of Social Work --" For crying out loud. Graduate College of Social Work? She's conducting the National Institutes of Health-funded effort. She said "one of the big problems young girls need to learn is how to talk their boyfriends into using condoms."
Here's the thing. This is something, as a civilized male, I learned early on. Women have the trump card in these talks. Women have the trump card. What do you mean, condom negotiation?
How does what work? Women having the trump card? I don't know how a condom negotiation works, Snerdley. You think I know about this? This is part of the New School effort. This woman is going to teach young women 14 to 17 about condom negotiation. Not gonna teach them to say no; not gonna teach them to say, "You know, you have no business here at 14 getting involved in this." We're not gonna do anything that might actually be good for them. We're gonna go ahead and indulge them in what they want to do because of course we can't stop it.
Kids are gonna have sex; we can't stop that. Kids are gonna do dope; can't stop there. I mean, they're gonna smoke; we can stop that. They're gonna eat; we can stop that. Maybe what this study ought to do is teach these 14-year-old girls not to have sex. Do you realize how old-fashioned that makes me sound? I'm just throwing the younger demographics away here, Snerdley. You know what my attitude ought to be on this? Fully support condom negotiation, learn what it is, conduct my own seminar on it on this program, and go out and get the young demographics. Go ahead and concede the fact 14-year-old girls are gonna have sex, just do it. The new slogan for the school: "Just do it, but learn condom negotiations."
It's amazing me. No thought here. Government, National Institute of Health, no thought in suggesting that a 14 to 17-year-old maybe abstain? No, no. A hundred thousand dollars is going to be spent to teach teenage girls condom negotiation. Well, you know, when you start talking negotiation, you've got arbitration, you need a third-party mediator in something like this. I mean, when you start talking this kind of stuff...
RUSH: Condom negotiation: Where the rubber hits the road. That would be the title of the study that they're working down in Houston.
Limbaugh has had some really good shows recently.
Hey, Kas hope your Thanksgiving was a great day.
We had fun and no one got punched in the face, always a good sign.
Have a wonderful December with kith and kin.
I’m available to teach this course, for 1/10th the cost.
Job skills training.
If I had one and put it on, everything was good. If I didn't, the subject instrument was never revealed.
I don't know where the room is in that for negotiation.
yippee! how nice! and how nice to learn where some of our tax money is going, too!
(and where did the last $6 trillion go?)
(does anyone see any significant new, useful public works “infrastructure” like when FDR ran up the public debt in the 1930’s-—? ....like, 6 trillion dollars worth?)
“does anyone see any significant new, useful public works infrastructure like when FDR ran up the public debt in the 1930s-? ....like, 6 trillion dollars worth?”
I am shocked, Shocked!
Don’t you consider having our Big Sh*tty center filled with rabidly racist Urban Ferals worth every penny of that 6 trillion bucks?
Don’t you know that never before in history have bastards cost so much? Aren’t you aware of the enormous cost of the edmacation system which assures that American Blacks are acculturated as we now see them? Their Feral, crypto-Muslim perspective was not cheap to create, I’ll have you know.
I can’t seem to find “condom training for children” in the US Constitution’s enumerated fed gov powers? Has the Constitution been amended recently and I missed it, or?
Back then, if you made them pregnant you had to marry them or go to jail.
“Hey, Ho! Get yo’ ass on dat bed. What? I can’ts perform wif dat balloon me. Now shut the f...up ‘for I slap yo crazy ass. And tell dat little white girl gubmint worker dat comes ‘round heah all da time that you and me just had our first negotiation. And I’ll vouch for you. heh heh heh.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.