Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
"Witness Eight is 18 years old and was 18 at the time according to Crump's interview of her according to her sworn statement . . .

Crump is a liar, but DeeDee may have been a minor on the day Martin was shot.

The article and the Motion to Compel deal with two key dates: February 26, 2012, when Martin was shot, and March 19, 2012 (on or about), when Crump interviewed DeeDee by phone in front of select witnesses and later gave a press conference.

During that press conference, Crump lied about DeeDee being sixteen (16) and lied when he said DeeDee is a minor (on March 19).

Jasmine Rand, one of Crump's law partners, said DeeDee was seventeen (17).

It's possible that DeeDee was seventeen (17) on February 26, when Martin was shot, but turned eighteen (18) before the March 19 interview.

31 posted on 12/01/2012 10:47:35 AM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

That’s possible. We’ll find out eventually.

All we know about this DeeDee is that she was 18 on April 2nd [according to her sworn statement] and hence could and should have been treated as an 18 year old — not a minor. But the State and Crump all carried on their charade.

According to her she knew Trayvon from kindergarten. How is that possible???

We may be dealing with multiple DeeDees.


52 posted on 12/01/2012 11:20:47 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Scoutmaster

Read the article. It CLEARLY states she was 18 at the time of the incident.


63 posted on 12/01/2012 11:45:01 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson