Posted on 12/03/2012 3:09:54 AM PST by lbryce
Edited on 12/03/2012 3:25:46 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
While President Obama insists the Bush tax cuts caused the recession and record deficits, his own economists say otherwise.
He might want to consult their data for the truth.
Kicking off fiscal cliff negotiations last month, Obama said: "What I'm not going to do is extend Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% that we can't afford and, according to economists, will have the least positive impact on our economy."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
Facts don't faze him. Never did.
Why don’t our candidates ever say this stuff in debates or broadcast it loudly so people can understand what we say isn’t bs?
It doesn’t matter. He won the election on community organizing, at which he is a master apparently, and which includes some vital voter fraud in the right places. Facts would make no difference to his voters.
B-HO is punishing the United States for being successful by ruining our economy. He delights in his evil.
B-HO ran guns to the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East. His goal there is to punish Israel for being successful. He delights in his evil.
Great read.
Thanks!
See my tagline for my opinion of BHO.
Bump
you are correct
“If we had an independent Media, Obama never would have been able to get near the WH.”
But we don’t.
Something else an upcoming Conservative leader must address as vociferously as Obamacare, cutting taxes, and smaller government.
That article posted here at FR within the past few months about there being as many as 50 entities of ownership of the various news media in the 1950’s, and NOW, TODAY only six was quite an eye popper.
Only six people/entities own the media in America today, and you know they are of the Left. NO PEOPLE, Murdoch of News Corporation is as Left as the rest of them. He’s found that Conservative news sells, and makes money for him, so he allows FOX to be somewhat conservative when it suits him.
This problem of six people/entities owning the media must be addressed by our leadership.
It is not just Obama.....it is all things liberal.
They lie about firearms and claim X-number of children are killed with firearms per year. The number includes "children" up to 25 years old and those shot by police and citizens during the commission of a crime.
They lie about "cuts" in spending that are reductions of the rate of increase.
Liberals lie because we have a media that never questions their masters and has become disinterested in scandals that result in deaths like Fast & Furious or Benghazi.
The corruption is far beyond Barack Hussein Obama.
His true purpose is to punish the successful...and as much of America as he can!
Sociopaths don’t understand shame.
Unfortunately, your point is all too true.
Bump
I think his internal dream is not to ‘destroy’ America per se. Hillary, when asked if she loved America, said “I love the America that can be”. I think Obama has this same philosophy, only more radical. Hillary would like to create a socialist America ruled by an ‘enlightened oligarchy’ - with ‘democracy’ sort of like the Hugo Chavez version. She, like Obama, is a narcissist who wants a glorious legacy.
Obama, wants the US to survive as one of a bunch of United Nations nation states that are all ultimately beholding to ‘world government’. He's too blinded by his juvenile ideology to accept the fact that if not for the traditional capitalist US model much of the world would have suffered much worse than it has. We have given the world much, but we never hear that anymore. That's a topic for a different discussion, but my point is that he doesn't want to eradicate America, just ‘transform’ it into the America he can eventually love. He clearly does not love the one that has existed - the one that allowed him to go to private schools and to world recognized universities despite being, in his own words, a poor student.
Obama said: "What I'm not going to do is extend Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% that we can't afford...#@!&% .. &%$#@&*
You're speaking nonsensical gibberish.
It's like telling your neighbors with jobs they can't buy something, say a new Benz, or matching tricked out Kimber 45's, because your family are the ones who are unemployed, broke, and ergo, 'we can't afford that'. See?, you ijit libtards, what you're saying is complete and utter nonsense. They CAN afford it as it is already theirs!
What is theirs IS theirs, and what is yours is yours. And theirs is NOT yours.
Obviously then, we speaks of the collective and Bozo detests individualism and therefore by extension, freedom. Ours freedoms are threatened by the hive mentality of today and the sheeple will not recognize this until its too late. I will relish the sound of their wailing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.