Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

With this and the last tenable vestiges of SuperSymmetry burning up in CERN things are changing.


6 posted on 12/03/2012 2:54:29 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by Nature, not NurtureĀ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: steve86
SuperSymmetry and QED aren't comparable in any sense. SS has always been speculative; it's attractive for some amthematical reasons but not mainstream. QED is as mainstream in particle physics as you get. It's not too far off to call it "The Central Dogma" (as molecular biologists refer to DNA.)

But there's nothing in this article that indicates that QED is in trouble, only that photomeission wavelengths differ from those predicted purely by QED. A much more likely explanation than the BIG HEADLINE that QED "might" be wrong is that there are other energy effects not accounted for by the experimenters.

That doesn't grab headlines or generate grant money, so they aren't going to broadcast the more pedestrian (and likely) explanation.

14 posted on 12/03/2012 4:05:01 PM PST by FredZarguna (Shut 'er down Clancy. She's pumpin' mud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson