Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now that Rahm Emmanuel has likened obamao to Lincoln (I kid you not, and it is on the basis of the idiotic movie Lincoln that he confirms this!-- what a lying homoron! Also that obamao is "from" Illinois LOL!).

Link: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/rahm-emanuel-likens-obama-lincoln.

I had to post this fact-based commentary on the former President, who was not superhuman, nor the ONE (though obamao is desperately trying to hijack Lincoln's aura,like he did Reagan before, as some kind of saviour to his "brothers"- NOT! This is laughable in that he is a muslim who believes in slavery of nonbelievers and the govt. plantation).

Needless to say the South has a lot to say about obamao, and NOT because he is a so-called "black" (he is not- he is a mulatto)- but because his goal is the destruction of the United States of America and our Constitution. For which an inordinate number of Southerners have fought and died since the War Between the States. And for which we will fight, again-- the Bill of Rights and our Constitutional Republic. The comments at the end of the article are heated, informed and uninformed, but they bring up even more items for Progressive Yankees(who put up a Massachusetts governor to defeat a Yankee based foreign Marxist-- that was smart, huh?) to chew on as they try to revive this empty suit, mind and chair of a notpresent__dent. In Hoc Signo Vinces. Deo Vindice.

1 posted on 12/03/2012 4:55:55 PM PST by John S Mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby

Sorry. Link to Emmanuel of God Chi-Town:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/rahm-emanuel-likens-obama-lincoln.


2 posted on 12/03/2012 4:57:21 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr

3 posted on 12/03/2012 4:59:33 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

1858: “I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.” (Lincoln, 1953, v3, p145-6)
1858: “We profess to have no taste for running and catching n*****s , at least I profess no taste for that job at all. Why then do Iyield support to a fugitive slave law? Because I do not understand that the Constitution, which guarantees that right, can be supported without it.” (Lincoln, 1953, v3, p317, see also p91 and p94))
1859: “Negro equality! Fudge! How long, in the government of a God, great enough to make and maintain this Universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagogism as this.” (Lincoln, 1953, v3, p399)
1860: “(Douglas’s comment) ‘In the struggle between the white man and the negro,’ assumes that there is a struggle, in which either the white man must enslave the negro or the negro must enslave the white.There is no such struggle! This good earth is plenty broad enough for white man and negro both, and there is no need of either pushing the other off.” (Lincoln, 1953, v4, p20)
1862: (To an audience of free Blacks.) “I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence…I need not recount to you the effects upon white men, growing out of the institution of Slavery. I believe in its general evil effects on the white race.” (Lincoln, 1953, v5, p37-3)
1862:”My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that... I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free.” (Appelman, p29)


4 posted on 12/03/2012 5:10:20 PM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby
Negro equality! Fudge!! How long, in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this? (From Fragments: Notes for Speeches, September, 1859)

That was something Lincoln scribbled down on a scrap of paper. It's hard to know what exactly he meant by it. Was he saying that racial equality was nonsense and demagoguery, or that charges that Republicans favored racial equality were nonsense and demagoguery?

Do you really think he was more troubled by a few people who believed in Negro equality than by the many Democrats who had charged him with believing in it? Obviously, like virtually everyone in his day Lincoln did not believe in racial equality, but his attitude towards the idea may not have been as violently opposed as one might think. In any event, it's not something Lincoln actually said.

5 posted on 12/03/2012 5:11:22 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Parading around the Confederate flag similar to parading around the Mexican flag. Both fought against the US. Americans (Republican led) crushed the Confederate traitors (demonrat led) who wanted to preserve their third-world feudal society.


6 posted on 12/03/2012 5:11:26 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Isn’t it time we got in their face for once?


7 posted on 12/03/2012 5:17:42 PM PST by jivin gene (Breakin' up is hard to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby
Not only did Lincoln and Obama get elected from the same state, but both were born citizens of a place starting with the same three letters--K, E, N. Kentucky and Kenya.

The Obama-as-the-reincarnation-of-Lincoln folks ought to take that and run with it.

16 posted on 12/03/2012 6:25:14 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby
I have a copy of Jim Goad's book The Redneck Manifesto. I don't agree with everything in it, of course, but nevertheless I hate to see him going "palaeo" (which is what Taki is).

I don't recall anyone ever claiming that the North was "innocent," but it certainly claimed to be the aggrieved party in the years leading immediately up to the Civil War because the Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise (which opened up "Bloody Kansas") followed by the Fugitive Slave Act and the Dred Scott decision (not to mention the caning by Preston Brooks of Senator Charles Sumner). From being confined to places where it had always been practiced it is obvious that the "slave power" was indeed attempting to spread the "peculiar institution" throughout the entire country.

While it's true that the anti-slavery movement can be compared in some ways to the contemporary Left, it can also be compared to today's social conservative movement in that it was being forced to see (and be complicit in) the spread of something it believed to be morally wrong and it was being told to shut up and take it.

The first seven states seceded before Lincoln had even been inaugurated, knowing full well that he had no intention of interfering with slavery where it already existed. They basically pitched a hissy fit because the candidate of a non-extentionist party (which is what the Republican party was) was elected at all--a true temper tantrum in every since of the word.

If the Southern states had stayed put slavery would have continued unmolested there and there would have been no war--but they had a rod up their butts because they wanted slavery to spread throughout the nation.

Before the neo-Confederates jump all over me, I remind them that the South was as divided as the North and that I am myself a proud descendant of Southern Unionists (and Repubicans).

17 posted on 12/03/2012 6:28:21 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Quite frankly I find that some Southerners constant whining about their victimhood to be quite tiring. It’s as if they are trying to overcompensate for an emasculation that happened hundreds of years ago.

White and black Southerners should form a team so they can organize their constant bellyaching into a more collaborative unit. They both seem to blame everything on someone else, a long time ago.


22 posted on 12/03/2012 7:51:57 PM PST by turn_to
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson