Posted on 12/04/2012 5:47:24 PM PST by capecodder
About his rant against the 2nd Amendment, in the manner of an explanation:
"...maybe I gave the audience too much credit...."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
So...he made a mistake...in saying...or “misspoke” as Hillary redefined “lied” and continues to lie in order to explain how dog gone much smarter he is than the average football fan?
Am I getting his point, or am I all washed up?
Wrong answer Bob!! Sorry, you lose again!!
The mistake was blaming the gun.
Cut the hands off of men. They might use them to strangle their women. I am vehemently opposed to men having hands and will make no apologies for that point of view.
No Bob, your mistake was opening your pie hole. If you don't talk, people might wonder about your limited intellect. If you talk, all doubt is erased.
Maybe you should just keep your damn fool liberal mouth shut?
Just give the score and keep your idiotic politics out of it, Bob.
Wish someone in the Sports Media would mention that if gays would stop using their “guns” inappropriately, a lot of them would still be alive and those alive would live longer.
You have to read his condesending explanation. It’s classic liberal. I’m sorry Viewers were too stupid to understand what I meant.
He could have shortened it by simply saying
“I forgot that Americans are stupid and full of ignorant, bitter, gun clingers and bible thumpers.”
Yeah, he sounds just like O’bonehead: “maybe I gave the audience too much credit”= “I didn’t know the public was so stupid. It couldn’t have been my fault. It’s all on you.”
It reminds me of something Larry the Cable Guy said about Natalie (Dixie Chicks) following her opinion puke in Europe about Bush.
"Natalie, you have a patriotic fan base. What did you think was gonna happen? You may have well run to the middle of a trailer park and yelled, Walmart Sucks!"
Limbaugh blames it on the easy availability of microphones. If Costas had not had an open mic, he would not have said what he did to millions and have to apologize now. Thousands of people have had their lives ruined by the careless use of a microphone over the last year alone. We must strengthen the laws that regulate just who is allowed to use a microphone in public.
Limbaugh should know, he called Fluke a slut into an open mike.
I seem to recall that Rush was fired for going off-script in his short Monday Night Football announcing career.
Hey Bob, tell us some more lies about you broadcasting games in the Eastern Hockey League. Stepped right into that cow flap, liar! Too bad you didn’t know that Norm MacLean was still alive.
He fits the definition of a pussy, and a liberal pussy to boot.
Hey Bob, tell us some more lies about you broadcasting games in the Eastern Hockey League. Stepped right into that cow flap, liar! Too bad you didn’t know that Norm MacLean was still alive.
God bless him, for confirming what people who love liberty have known about "progressives" all along: they're primarily emoters incapable of clear thought who'd love to do away with the Constitution ("a charter of negative liberties") in general and the Bill of Rights in particular.
Speaking from the -- (let us hope) soon to once again be vacant -- Keith Olbermann Chair for Progressive Lunacy on Sunday Night Football, Costas echoed the moronic sentiments of some other raving whackjob at FoxSports.com about needing to do away with fundamental liberties. His name is unimportant. His kind are a dime a dozen in sports "newsrooms." (Alright. Alright! In keeping with my strict policy that douchebags of every stripe should be held up for ridicule, his name is Jason Whitlock.)
I have a modest proposal for those of you who think repealing some parts of the Bill of Rights you don't believe us Untermenschen should enjoy -- naturally from within the trusty redoubts of your gated communities and behind the privileged pistols of your own armed security -- is a Great Idea. If you really want to reduce gun violence and gun-related homicides, the 2nd Amendment is the wrong place to start. The low hanging fruit is elsewhere, my friend.
Start instead, with the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Recidivism rates among violent criminals in most states is over 90%, and over half of the people who will be convicted of homicides this year are accessories to, or perpetrators of, a least one previous homicide. Why do we need a trial by jury for people like that? Let's just lock them up.
The right not to incriminate yourself? Dude ... Seriously? Judges, DA's, cops, juvenile authorities and everyone who deals in law enforcement will tell you that _EVERYONE_ is guilty. Everyone. We aren't a rich country any more; we're actually worse off as a function of GDP/debt ratio than Greece. So why are we still pussyfooting around with evidentiary rules and expensive public defenders? Take these people down to the basement and work them over under a sweat-lamp with a rubber hose for a few hours just like in the good old days. Plea bargaining is best conducted with the soon-to-be defendant on his knees.
Assistance of Counsel? Scumbags. You know it. I know it. Everybody -- even _THEY_ know it. Warrants? Probable Cause? Do you know how many criminals go free on these technicalities every year? Assume that the act of just being an American is implied consent for invasive searches of everything including your body cavities. The TSA does.
"OK," you say, "this sounds pretty stupid, but the stats are the stats. So I guess I could go along with this if it was only the criminals we were depriving of their Constitutional Rights. But it wouldn't be. It would be law abiding citizens."
What are you? A jerk?
This argument certainly doesn't pass muster with the gun-grabbers, as far as they're concerned, law abiding citizens have no more right to the 2nd Amendment than criminals do. So why should they have a right to the 4th, or the 5th, or the 6th Amendment, either? If we're going to put an end to gun violence at the expense of the Constitution, everybody is going to have to give up something.
And hey, putting Shakespeare's plan concerning Professional Advocates in place would even become a practical reality. Who knows where it might end...?
[The Bill of Rights: It's not just one Amendment, jackasses.]
Ironic hypocrisy.
Such people would be better off performing their own security.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.