To: Fractal Trader
So? Hey, who are we to judge? We can't impose "our" morals on society. These people should be free to have sex with family members, animals, various fruits and vegetables, and certain inanimate objects. Telling people that certain things are wrong is engaging in nasty moralism. Those who object to animals being used for sexual purposes should remember that no animal has ever proffered a written objection to sex with a human. So there.
Remember, the most important thing in the world of moral relativists is that there is no such thing as morals. If something feels good, you should be able to do it. Which means if it feels good to get a huge club and beat the father in this case, I should be able to do it. It would certainly feel good.
The leftists, no matter what they claim, are NOT “moral relativists”. No one can consistently maintain that false assertion.
What they really mean is “God, we don’t want YOUR rules. We want to make our own, to be our own gods.”
Ah... yes, Humanism, the basis of liberalism. It began with the statement “you will be as gods”.
posted on 12/05/2012 11:16:23 AM PST
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson