I thought it was the evil Buuuush who said that we needed to intervene in Iraq because Sadam had chemical weapons. Our best intelligence said he had them. Not only that, but he'd already used them on his own people. But that was bad and wrong.
And now the saintly good and true 0sama administration is saying that we'll intervene in Syria's civil war if Assad uses chemical weapons. Our best intelligence says that he has them. But this is different and oh so very very good.
I just want to make sure I have all this down. Because I would never ever accuse our commie-elite-political-media-class of being lying hypocrites with selective and self-serving memories and motives.
I wanted to post the same thing, but you beat me to it!
Yes, what Bush did was wrong (of course, he had congressional approval).
What Obama does (even without congressional approval) is good.
If you do not agree, you need re-education.
You can bet that they’re going to find WMD in Syria. They’ve got the cargo loaded and ready to fly in when needed.
And the kicker is those are the chemical weapons that were in Iraq.