Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Housing Administration: the Next Housing Bailout
NCPA ^ | 06 December 2012

Posted on 12/06/2012 8:21:14 AM PST by Lorianne

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) recently released its 2012 fiscal year actuarial review of the single family mortgage insurance fund and concluded it was insolvent. It is likely that the FHA will be the next government bailout for the housing industry, says Joe Gyourko, the Martin Bucksbaum professor of Real Estate, Finance and Business & Public Policy at the Wharton School of Business. •The value of the fund is measured by looking at the difference between the expected revenues of the insurance program and expected costs associated with the defaults of underlying mortgages. •This year, the value was reported to be negative $13.48 billion. •As a result, it would need $50 billion to $100 billion for the program to be solvent.

Even more troubling is that a recent Federal Reserve policy that keeps interest rates lower for a longer period by FHA's actuarial reviewer will result in greater losses for the FHA mortgage insurance portfolio.

Critics of the program long argued that important risks were being undervalued. Even with improvements to the model used to predict default and claims, it does not capture all the risks.

Currently, potential liabilities are 41 times the total capital reserves. No major entity operates, or should operate, with its core capital reserves so highly leveraged (a measure of the concentration of debt usage for private companies).

For the past several years, the FHA has expected future insurance proceeds to cover past losses, only to be disappointed. The FHA argues that it will grow out of insolvency based on estimates of net worth of the next seven years of mortgage insurance that the FHA is expected to write. However, it is based on mortgages that have not been taken out by borrowers yet.

Source: Joe Gyourko, "FHA, the Next Housing Bailout: Update and Evaluation," American Enterprise Institute, November 19, 2012.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/06/2012 8:21:19 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The Federal Government was not supposed to be a Bank per se. They tried that with the First Bank of America.

Now they've extended that "wrong" so you will soon have to get ALL financing (school loans are an example) through the Feds and they will take payments due right out of your assets and bank accounts. You won't have a dime left.

2 posted on 12/06/2012 8:56:43 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

And the young and dumb think bigger gov is a good thing,to bad they have no idea what’s going on.
All they know is that Obama loves to spend and spend.


3 posted on 12/06/2012 9:19:56 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson