Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/07/2012 12:11:59 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jet Jaguar

Put an AEGIS ship in international waters. . . and as soon as it leaves NK airspace. . . .shoot it down. Oopsie. . .


2 posted on 12/07/2012 12:14:30 AM PST by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border. I **DARE** you to cross it. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar

Yeah, like President Snowball wants to upset one of his few remaining allies by shooting down an ICBM.


3 posted on 12/07/2012 2:43:13 AM PST by jonascord (Hurrah for the Bonnie Blue Flag that bears thingle Star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar

Look at the night satellite image of the Japan Sea. No night lights at all in N. Korea but massive lights in S. Korea and Japan. A 40 mile high nuclear explosion over the middle of the Sea of Japan would EMP most of Japan and all of S. Korea with virtually no effect on N. Korea.

A successful satellite at 250 miles over Omaha would EMP the entire USA causing the eventual deaths of 90% of the US population.

No that would reduce our carbon footprint.


4 posted on 12/07/2012 4:17:19 AM PST by Any Fate But Submission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar

The only difference between a satellite launch (attempt) and an ICBM test is the payload. Both test the rest of the vehicle, stressing it and exercising the components. And if your “satellite” launch is unsuccessful - doesn’t achieve orbit and instead re-enters the atmosphere... You just tested your RV too. Satellite launch my xxx.


5 posted on 12/07/2012 4:28:43 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar
On Thursday, Adm.Samuel Locklear, the head of the U.S. Pacific Command, said American warships were being shifted into position to track the North Korean launch and take defensive actions if necessary.

SBX anywhere? http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CFcQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aviationweek.com%2FArticle.aspx%3Fid%3D%2Farticle-xml%2Fawx_02_13_2012_p0-424718.xml&ei=nfzBUInqAszEqQGnkoCQCw&usg=AFQjCNEmOme1BQ2zEEa-UpvWaSChKPmOSw&cad=rja

It almost appears that we spent $1B to build it and do not want to use it. Although:

http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/12/06/2012120601027.html says, "A South Korean military source on Wednesday said the U.S. will send the same SBX to the Western Pacific as it did in April."

6 posted on 12/07/2012 7:34:56 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar

Gee, what are we going to do about it? Put a missile on Hillary’s broom and send her to Korea?


7 posted on 12/07/2012 3:52:37 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson