Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Justice will swear in 0bama on Jan. 20 2013
Me | 12 / 8 / 2012 | Lionheartusa1

Posted on 12/08/2012 8:39:03 AM PST by Lionheartusa1

1) Can anyone tell me which Supreme Court Justice will swear 0bama in in the proposed private swearing in ceremony . Something unusual is happening again this time and many people feel he may be sworn in using the koran but we will not know for sure . 2) Will they by law be required to use the same exact oath that previous presidents have been sworn in under requiring them to " preserve , protect , and defend the Constitution of the United States"?

There are "two" questions I need to be answered . Thank you . . .


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: rinoroberts; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Lionheartusa1

Benedict Arnold swearing in the Butcher of Bengazi.
Whadda country.


21 posted on 12/08/2012 9:17:13 AM PST by lgjhn23 (When the tainted finger of government touches anything, the ROT begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1

Roberts of course. A commie swearing in a red diaper baby.


22 posted on 12/08/2012 9:17:26 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

She’s gay too.


23 posted on 12/08/2012 9:28:46 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1

This president has never given a damn about about the Constitution except when he could use it to manipulate people.


24 posted on 12/08/2012 9:42:02 AM PST by jimfree (In November 2016 my 12 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
She’s gay too.

Why not? An affirmative action appointee by our affirmative action president.
25 posted on 12/08/2012 9:43:13 AM PST by Nowhere Man (It is about time we re-enact Normandy, at the shores of the Potomac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

Which gay one. Roberts or Kagan?


26 posted on 12/08/2012 9:49:09 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1

There was some controversy over the first swearing in that necessitated a second private swearing in. I don’t remember exactly what the controversy was.


27 posted on 12/08/2012 9:57:25 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“You can’t be a USA citizen and oath to the political system attached to the Koran.”

Yes, you can. In 2010, some US representative used the Koran and I don’t recall his name but it made the news because I heard/read it and my thought was, “Now they are in our government”. That’s why I remember that.

It is the oath that is legal/required, the Bible is an add on and doesn’t have to be there; it is tradition, not law.

The country is no longer the one we knew growing up.


28 posted on 12/08/2012 10:03:58 AM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eva

“There was some controversy over the first swearing in that necessitated a second private swearing in. I don’t remember exactly what the controversy was.”

Roberts was speaking the words of the oath and Hussein was repeating after him and Roberts got the words mixed up and Hussein tried to repeat Roberts words. It was an embarrassing moment for both of them, but now I think it was done on purpose so the legal oath could be the next day in private using the Koran.


29 posted on 12/08/2012 10:13:05 AM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

You are probably right. I just can’t take this any more. I used to use the tag line, “Once a Muslim, always a Muslim” because I wanted to point out that if Obama is not practicing Islam, he would be considered an apostate and the be condemned to death under Sharia, yet we have never heard any indication of a complaint from the Mullahs of the world.


30 posted on 12/08/2012 10:39:21 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Marcella; Eva; Lionheartusa1
A president is required by the Constitution to say, "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States . . ."

At the inauguration, Roberts instead said: "I do solemnly swear that I will execute the office of president of the United States faithfully . . ."

31 posted on 12/08/2012 10:43:23 AM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1
Article II, § 1 - Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Nothing about anyone having to "administer" this "covenant with the many," nor book, nor much else added to the traditions begun by General Washington.

Since the truth, itself, seems not to be, in any way, sacred to the usurper's practices, especially the letter of the Constitution as a limit on the prerogative of the Executive under Federalism, why wouldn't the Chief Justice "administer" said oath, and why would he use a Koran, except as a provocation, intent as he seems to be in fomenting a national crisis to furthering Lincoln's project establishing the supremacy of federal power?

32 posted on 12/08/2012 10:44:56 AM PST by Prospero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

Well, BO has certainly “executed” the office of POTUS. It’s now a mangled corpse.


33 posted on 12/08/2012 10:45:55 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

There’s not a legal requirement for the CJOTUS to do it, but I would be surprised if it were not Roberts.

The only time it hasn’t been done by the CJOTUS is 1789, 1793 and then to fill a vacancy: 1841, 1850, 1881 (although Chet Arthur was sworn in by the CJOTUS two days later), 1901, 1923, and 1963.

Andrew Johnson, Truman, and Ford were all sworn in by the CJOTUS.


34 posted on 12/08/2012 10:46:14 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marcella
In 2010, some US representative used the Koran and I don’t recall his name . . .

Keith Ellison (D, Minnesota)

35 posted on 12/08/2012 10:48:43 AM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1
Something unusual is happening again this time and many people feel he may be sworn in using the koran but we will not know for sure

Obama isn't going to take his oath on a Koran. Good grief, people! Where do some of you come up with this stuff?

If Obama is a Muslim, he's not a very good one. The guy eats pork, drinks alcohol and places Jews in positions of great power.

Some days, I swear...

36 posted on 12/08/2012 10:59:11 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1

None of this stuff matters anymore, not with Obama or any dem in office. Obama doesn’t have any respect for our constitution our country or the truth.... an oath means nothing too him.

Obama could be within a stall in a mens restroom and place his hand on a stack of ‘Mad magazines’ while singing ‘Home on the Range’. It’s all meaningless.

I’ve never been with a prostitute, but I see any oath that Obama pretends to take just as serious, truthful and binding as a prostitute proclaiming that she loves you and screaming, “You’re my Cowboy”....


37 posted on 12/08/2012 10:59:54 AM PST by Gator113 (**WHO in the hell gave the damn order to NOT rescue our men in Benghazi?**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Deception & lies in islam (spit!) are permitted:

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Lying_and_Deception_in_Islam

http://www.muslimfact.com/bm/terror-in-the-name-of-islam/islam-permits-lying-to-deceive-unbelievers-and-bri.shtml


38 posted on 12/08/2012 11:26:17 AM PST by carriage_hill (Don't whiz on the electric fence. Awwwww-yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1

Probably another brain dead moron with a “compelling life story”. The Supreme Court is becoming a big joke. A freak farm. I agree with another poster. It will probably be a fag. Maybe even a child molester. That’s the way the judicial system is going these days.


39 posted on 12/08/2012 11:29:22 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Don't tax me bro! Tax that guy over there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

Kieth Ellison I believe was sworn in using the Koran .


40 posted on 12/08/2012 11:40:37 AM PST by Lionheartusa1 (-: Socialism & Communism are the equal distribution of misery :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson