when do they come out with a version that says not to look at a woman with lust? That would be useful for myself.
Serious, if meeting another dude and giving him a BJ is NOT a sin, then there is no such thing as a sexual sin.
If there’s no such thing as a sexual sin, is there such thing as other sins?
“Serious, if meeting another dude and giving him a BJ is NOT a sin, then there is no such thing as a sexual sin.”
So I figure if Bill Clinton had gotten his infamous non-sexual BJ from a guy, he still wouldn’t be a sinner in the eyes of these editors?
Actually, I was challenged to find in the Bible where homosexual sin was especially worse than heterosexual sin. All I could find was that sexual sin was especially heinous because it is a sin against the body which is a temple of the Lord.
Not to be sticking up for queers, but I’m guilty of heterosexual sin making me no less guilty than the queers, only that I am repentant and forgiven by the power of Jesus’ blood do I get a pass.
Jesus is an equal opportunity forgiver. (I know you know, just stating for the record.)