Maybe they start by recognizing the value of children—and start PROTECTING them; rather than locking them in a cage to be shot.
What if we had a coodinated attack by several Jihadis? At a few schools in the same jurisdiction?
The required changes to the “mental health system” to convert into a “crazed nut control system” are massive, and massively expensive.
The required changes of our thinking, feeling, and acting are even more massive, so much so as to be almost beyond comprehension.
A country that would elect a President on the say-so of Sandra Fluke is not going to start identifying and inhibiting loonies. Not in a million years.
Unfortunately it is also “normal” in this degraded age to try as hard as possible to avoid any PERSONAL responsibility for “making sure etc...”. So we pass another law...for government to implement.
They admit that the doors must be locked against someone yet no one was standing guard.
Look at how well making homicide illegal has worked out. Laws are a joke in this country. We've got laws against illegal immigration. Now, we're rewarding those who break them.
Hey just keep people away from guns and cars if they are taking a med that causes violent outbursts or rage or urges to commit suicide. Such drugs are usually present in mass killings.
“But enacting new rules designed to force killers to re-load more often, to fire less deadly bullets or to use machetes or poison or bombs instead of bullets, will hardly vanquish evil from our future reality.”
Progressives/relativists don’t see the difference in good and evil, so they can’t relate to this statement.
Remember what the Soviets did with laws like that. The Soviet psychiatric care system became a parallel track for incarceration and defamation of dissidents.
You have brought forth a very thoughtful post. It is not the irritating knee-jerk garbage that comes from the dumb-down media out there banging up society with their wrecking cars.