Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Face a Cliff Now or a Chasm Later ^ | December 17, 2012 | Terry Paulsen

Posted on 12/17/2012 5:34:43 AM PST by Kaslin

Thomas Jefferson warned us, "I, however, place economy among the first and most important Republican virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers to be feared. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt... I am for a government rigorously frugal and simple."

Nothing we face compares to the challenge our founding fathers faced in winning independence and forming a more perfect union, but reclaiming a "frugal and simple" government will take far more than replaying another version of Washington's "fiscal cliff" charade.

Congress first put a limit on federal debt during World War I. The limit was part of a law to allow the US Treasury to issue Liberty Bonds to help fund the war. Congress gave the Treasury greater discretion over borrowing by eliminating the need for Congress to approve each new issue of debt until it reached a specified limit. In short, Congress could authorize borrowing and then wait until they reached the next limit to argue over whether to disavow what they had already allowed.

Unfortunately, the consequences of not approving irresponsible spending and borrowing as they face the cliff is always too grave and unpredictable to allow. So there are speeches and public displays of bravado, and then...a new limit! Since March 1962, debt ceiling increases have been enacted 76 times.Congress has raised the ceiling 11 times since 2001.

So with the current version of political theater, we can already predict the outcome. There will be hand wringing, threats of economic chaos, promises of not giving in, and then...a higher debt ceiling and more debt. They "kick the can" down the road, but with President Obama's accelerated spending binge that "can" is rapidly becoming a 30-gallon drum that is getting harder and harder to kick anywhere!

In the 70's and 80's, Fram Oil Filter ads focused consumers on purchasing a low-cost oil filter instead of waiting for a very expensive engine job later. Their ad's punch line was memorable, “The choice is yours. Pay me now or pay me later.”

In your home, when do you finally cut up the credit card and face the music for uncontrolled spending? The current election results suggest that Americans have not reached that point on our national debt. When will Americans force their politicians to change their irresponsible spending and borrowing habits? Will we change while the "cliff" is still manageable or will we wait until our economy is forced to take a less-than-grand leap off a fiscal Grand Canyon?

Ronald Reagan shared painful truths that made you laugh before you cried, "The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program.” If change is to occur, we'll know Washington is serious about our economic future when:

1. They stop telling us they have a "balanced" 10-year plan when the tax increases are on the front end and the spending cuts come on the back end.

2. The Senate passes and President Obama signs into law HR 920--"The Baseline Reform Act." The bill would end automatic spending increases, institute zero-based budgeting which forces Washington to propose and pass a real budget every year, and end politicians claiming they are making "cuts" when they're only making a "decrease in the increase" their irresponsible budgeting sham.

3. They force the Fed to stop using fancy words like "quantitative easing" and admit that they're just printing more money that decreases the value of the dollar. Since 1960, the dollar has lost 80% of its value. Obama's policies aren't just taxing the rich, their destroying the value of every dollar YOU own.

4. They end America's current welfare dependency trap where, as Thomas Sowell rightly observes, "Someone who is trying to climb out of poverty...can easily reach a point where a $10,000 increase in pay can cost them $15,000 in lost benefits that they no longer qualify for."

5. They stop promising to pay off the loan debt students can't afford and start explaining how much more they will owe in the future for the unprecedented debt politicians are creating every day.

6. They actually make government smaller instead of continuing to add an average of 101 NEW employees every day!

It's "pay me now or pay me later." This "fiscal cliff" will come and go, but the "Fiscal chasm" will continue to grow until voters force politicians to make fundamental changes. It's time to take the blank check away from our politicians, but they won't do anything until we demand it!

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: budgetdeficit; debt; debtceiling; fiscalcliff

1 posted on 12/17/2012 5:34:55 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good idea, but there is another half to the story:

Bring back US jobs.

We cannot shrink government, while we are also shrinking private enterprise.

Bring back US jobs.

2 posted on 12/17/2012 5:38:23 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Take the cliff, but ride the Democrats and the turncoat RepublicRATS to the bottom.

3 posted on 12/17/2012 5:38:41 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Boama wants to turn our health care into a third world system that would make an African witch doctor proud. He wants an economy of barter where we trade goats for bread.
4 posted on 12/17/2012 5:41:25 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How much can we screw-up Government and still quote the Founders?

We have made it so that what they feared most has come to pass. The majority can sit on their behinds and crack the whip at a working minority. They even get to call the minority all manner of vile names in order to win public office while they do this.

We need to abolish the 17th Amendment. It has made the Senate into a Super-House. The Senate is now even more hyperbolic and over-reactive than even the House. So much for checks and balances.

Something needs to be done about voting. It makes absolutely no sense for the recioients of public money to have a say in how much is to be acquired and how much they will receive. The Founders knew this.

I believe the only right solution is to deny the vote to those who receive public money. Many already “work” in government and so, in essence, already have a power greater than that of the vote to affect the course of government. I would grant that service in the Armed Forces in defense of the United States would restore the right for life.

Something needs to be done. We should start by fixing our mistakes.

5 posted on 12/17/2012 6:11:14 AM PST by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Government’s budget ‘solutions’ (tax increases) become every household’s budget problem...

6 posted on 12/17/2012 6:24:49 AM PST by 4Liberty (Some on our "Roads & Bridges" head to the beach. Others head to their offices, farms, libraries....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Empire_of_Liberty

Obama is running the country why do we need to pay Congress?

We could do away with Congress and the whole of their staff, they aren’t doing anything anyway.

Didn’t Boehner just agree not to fight a rise in the deficit?

7 posted on 12/17/2012 6:31:02 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

8 posted on 12/17/2012 10:56:35 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

how do you propose to do that? seriously, what’s your proposal?

9 posted on 12/18/2012 12:13:23 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Sorry we are not to the “how” stage yet.

What we need first is an agreement, that we need to change.

Sending our manufacturing to a growing superpower 4 times our size, is not the solution.

10 posted on 12/18/2012 7:35:25 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Sending our manufacturing...” — that’s an action in the past. It’s already done. We don’t send new manufacturing work to China.

11 posted on 12/18/2012 7:46:24 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I strongly disagree.

That said, how do we get out now.

We have “American” corporations who have sold all but their high muckety-mucks jobs, who are selling us into slavery.

Bring back US jobs. Now.

12 posted on 12/18/2012 7:49:10 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson