Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NKP_Vet
It is a debate worth having

Erick Erickson may think debates on inalienable rights are "worth having".

I do not.

2 posted on 12/17/2012 9:09:23 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel_Flagg
I wholeheartedly second that.

It is not Mr. Erickson's, nor anyone else's purview to question rights confirmed to us in the US Constitution by suggesting these rights be illegally abridged for expediency in the wake of Newtown.

If they want to have this discussion, then they should have it in a forum where 3/4ths of the states can ratify their amendment to take away my right under the 2nd Amendment.

This recent event is a complete tragedy and it warrants compassion and decency; it does not legitimize all the ghouls, political opportunists, rabid liberal rights-takers and their ilk in masking their goals with the sorrow of this.

4 posted on 12/17/2012 9:21:14 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel_Flagg

I think Eric knows the Constitution is going to have be fought for in order for it to survive, and the gun arguement is the tip of the spear.

The Second Ammendment ranks plenty high in the Constitution, but we are overtaken by communists who are now entrenched in government and media and culture, therefore are empowered to make a very good run at diluting it.

Our showing in this fight will be dependent on the engagement of the people themselves, because we have too few in power who can win it for us alone.


7 posted on 12/17/2012 9:33:26 AM PST by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson