To: FredZarguna; waynesa98
Reread my post commenting on #5. Do you not agree the poster of 5 is FOS.
regarding “The original accuser had alleged sexual assault and ongoing harassment over a period of years”, clearly the hairdresser was complicit in not terminating services to the Senator immediately.
posted on 12/18/2012 10:19:47 AM PST
(Ted Cruz for President of the Republic of Texas)
To: X-spurt; waynesa98
It depends on the meaning of FOS
. In my lexicon, he is not FOS
, only PCS (Partially Containing Sh!t.) The Senator is alleged to have sexaully assaulted a woman who continued to see him. I don't know if English even has a word for that level of idiocy, but "complicity" is not the one I'd choose. Since the allegations never led to an indictment or conviction, I would not call him a rapist any more than I would call Bill Clinton a rapist based on Juanita Broaddrick's testimony.
They are both alleged rapists.
posted on 12/18/2012 10:34:29 AM PST
(Wavefunction = loosely, and incorrectly, state vector.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson