Skip to comments.HOUSTON DEM PRECINCT CHAIR: STOP GUN VIOLENCE BY SHOOTING NRA MEMBERS
Posted on 12/18/2012 4:16:36 AM PST by lowbridge
Over the weekend, Houston Democrat Precinct Chair John Cobarruvias tweeted, "Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?"
This, apparently, is part of what he calls "hard-hitting political commentary" on his blog "Bay Area Houston."
Prior to the asinine tweet broaching the subject of shooting NRA members as a solution to gun violence, Cobarruvias had spent some of his "hard-hitting political commentary" mocking conservatives -- or as Cobarruvias himself put it, by "laughing and puking on GOP Tea Baggers."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Arrest Mr. Cobarruvias.
Another Democratic Party buttercup posing as a tough guy.
It’s an honor to be hated by these @ssholes
Arrest him? But he’s a democrat! Laws don’t apply to them.
“’Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?’”
You can try, but be advised that we shoot back and aim better.
This is an actionable threat.
Just say when Johnny.
Nothing says 'mourning innocents lost' like proposing more mass murder of innocents.
Does this clown understand that some of the parents of those children could easily be members of the NRA? Now he proposes killing them too? Really?
Shoot us with what? Does the anti-gun crowd own guns? Oh my!
It’s not the NRA members who are shooting people. This brain can look at his own party that has created a dependent society. They dish out welfare checks so people live a meager and meaningless life. Those folks then see what others have and realize the only way to get it is by selling drugs, joinging gangs, etc. and the violence begins.
Democrats are against guns and gun violence, but they want to use guns to shoot law-abiding, American citizens. How very liberal of them.
Oh yes. They (or their paid security) own guns... they just don't want you to have them.
Unlike what the Democrats have done for the children in schools everywhere, (leave them defenseless when a lone nutcase comes around), I have taught them to shoot, and I will use lethal force to defend them.
The most dangerous nutcases in America aren't firing guns, they are shooting off their mouths, demanding restrictions on a fundamental Civil Right directly affecting 80,000,000 to 100,000,000 American firearm owners, because of the actions of ONE PERSON.
You would be surprised at how many guns they own. They are not really anti-gun. They just don’t want you to have any.
Senor Cobarruvias must be positively furious over his boy’s Fast & Furious criminal armament program. (/sarc)
“Shoot us with what?”
Mind-numbingly bad grammar and/or spelling?
They do have a rather full arsenal at their disposal.
Being in Houston is very much like being behind enemy lines. It is a noxious and dangerous environment, particularly for people “without” color.
Meanwhile in the cities, in Chicago, the murders go uncelebrated. The deaths in Newton are trivial compared to the ongoing negro on negro slaughter in Chicago
Indeed. He is inciting violence against NRA members. Since many NRA members have NRA decals on our vehicles, he is making us targets for violence.
The guy blogs to nowhere. No replies. No discussion. He is a dripping faucet. He will crap himself if he shot a .22 pistol.
No law against a democrat inciting violence, right?
Can we now shoot Cobarruvias and people of his ilk since they don’t believe in self defense? It would get them out of our hair once and for all.
Are you going to draw them pistols, Johnny, or just stand there and whistle Dixie?
Yeah, He can start the shooting, right here in Texas. It can be the subject of a very short book that only has two blank covers and no pages......
You’re comment and FReeper name work perfectly!
Better be a good first shot because I shoot back!
“hard-hitting political commentary”?
Try “terroristic threat”, a-hole.
Guns in the hands of agents of the government, of course.
I work near Chuckie Schumer’s apartment in Brooklyn, NY. Sometimes on my way to work, I see him being picked up by an armed detective... It’s OK for him to have guns to protect his sorry butt, but not ME???
Just more proof that liberalism IS a mental disorder.
Sure, if you want to start that game.....
That about sums it up.
Make our day.
Guy sounds real ‘intelligent’....trying to ‘threaten’ people that have NRA membership. No wonder he’s a Democrat.
People with NRA decals have guns and could shott back.
They feel that we are the slaves and they are the masters.
Unfortunately for us, a good porption of the sheep keep re-affirming their viepoint each two and four years.
That psycho sounds pretty violent. Better watch him.
The final solution of mass murdering thought enemies, is the way of Utopia. This lowlife is probably from Mexico. He wants America to join the fun of constant mass slaughter that is ongoing in his racially superior homeland.
He called for the murder of people in the spirit of the madman who murdered in Conn. He needs to be arrested for inciting murder and sued.
What if NRA members called for Democrats to be shot?
Dear Mr. Cobarruvias:
I am the NRA. I am right here in Texas, live and in person. At your earliest convenience PLEASE bring it on!! I would LOVE to get it on with you. I can hardly wait for the party to begin. And oh, BYOBB. In case you don’t know what that is, that’s “bring your own body bag”.
I ask again, what relationship does the NRA—a safety-promoting, human rights promoting, sports promoting volunteer organization—have to do with a monster who kills innocent children?
Could this Houston monster—yes, he is a monster who is advocating the murder of innocent people—be trying to attack his political opponents? Is he trying to get back at his opponents for past political losses? Hmmmm—I think it is a fairly evil way to do so, very fascist.
I have often told people that leftists are potentially very violent people. Their history is unambiguous. Beware of them in the future as they gather additional political influence. The leftists’ opponents will not be treated as well as the leftists were treated in old America.
Every die hard Leftist I’ve encountered has displayed a deep seated anger at “something” that is never well defined. I know of a couple who agreed with Obama’s “revenge” statement prior to the election. They’re potential Lanzas or Loughners who either haven’t summoned up the courage or gone far enough over the edge to act on their inner impulse.
I'd rather throw him into a waiting cargo van and speed off to a place of privacy to have a heart to heart conversation. I'm sure he'd see the light.
(Of course if you add in the liberal's efforts with abortion, we are tied for first place.)
Texas Penal Code - Section 22.07. Terroristic Threat
§ 22.07. TERRORISTIC THREAT. (a) A person commits an
offense if he threatens to commit any offense involving violence to
any person or property with intent to:
(1) cause a reaction of any type to his threat by an
official or volunteer agency organized to deal with emergencies;
(2) place any person in fear of imminent serious
(3) prevent or interrupt the occupation or use of a
building, room, place of assembly, place to which the public has
access, place of employment or occupation, aircraft, automobile, or
other form of conveyance, or other public place;
(4) cause impairment or interruption of public
communications, public transportation, public water, gas, or power
supply or other public service;
(5) place the public or a substantial group of the
public in fear of serious bodily injury; or
(6) influence the conduct or activities of a branch or
agency of the federal government, the state, or a political
subdivision of the state.
(b) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a Class B
(c) An offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a Class B
misdemeanor, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if the
(1) is committed against a member of the person’s
family or household or otherwise constitutes family violence; or
(2) is committed against a public servant.
(d) An offense under Subsection (a)(3) is a Class A
misdemeanor, unless the actor causes pecuniary loss of $1,500 or
more to the owner of the building, room, place, or conveyance, in
which event the offense is a state jail felony.
(e) An offense under Subsection (a)(4), (a)(5), or (a)(6) is
a felony of the third degree.
(f) In this section:
(1) “Family” has the meaning assigned by Section
71.003, Family Code.
(2) “Family violence” has the meaning assigned by
Section 71.004, Family Code.
(3) “Household” has the meaning assigned by Section
71.005, Family Code.
(g) For purposes of Subsection (d), the amount of pecuniary
loss is the amount of economic loss suffered by the owner of the
building, room, place, or conveyance as a result of the prevention
or interruption of the occupation or use of the building, room,
place, or conveyance.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974.
Amended by Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 1114, ch. 530, § 2, eff. Aug.
27, 1979; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1,
1994; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 139, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003;
Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 388, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts
2003, 78th Leg., ch. 446, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003; Acts 2005,
79th Leg., ch. 728, § 16.003, eff. Sept. 1, 2005.
Arrest him for terroristic threats. It’s a felony...
Those in Texas should get out as fast as possible....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.