Skip to comments.THE LEFT'S DISHONEST WAR ON GUNS
Posted on 12/18/2012 6:34:03 AM PST by shortstop
The key to the gun banners success will be divide and conquer.
If they can convince hunters and householders that assault rifles and high-capacity magazines are too much, they will succeed.
If gun owners stand together, the Second Amendment will be preserved. If they dont, it will be endangered. Coming months will show which it is.
In the wake of the heartbreaking mass murder at Sandy Hook Elementary, Democrat politicians across the country have pushed hard to capitalize on the tragedy to advance one of their long-held political passions banning guns. Grandstanding politician after grandstanding politician some wiping away invisible tears have said something must be done. Many have mentioned how uncivilized our society is.
And all have tried to draft on the liberal agendas impression of rising invincibility. Finally, they have said, its time to do something about guns.
That means get rid of them.
And all gun owners must recognize that.
All gun owners.
The Democrats in office and in the press have vilified assault rifles and high-capacity magazines like they have vilified everything from talk radio to Mitt Romney in an effort to stigmatize them. They have even verbally embraced hunters and target shooters, trying to drive a wedge between different parts of the gun community.
The argument is that hunters and their guns are good, but assault rifles and their owners are bad. One is normal, the other is kooky.
Thats what the Democrats are selling.
And thats what some gun owners are buying.
And thats too bad, because its a bunch of crap.
Because a gun is a gun is a gun, and anybody who thinks one kind of gun is innately more dangerous than another is someone who doesnt know guns.
Unfortunately, that can sometimes include people who actually own guns.
Unfortunately, some gun owners fail to realize that an attack on one gun is an attack on all guns, and that efforts to ban one gun pave the way for efforts to ban every gun.
So lets take the Democrats central premise, that assault rifles are worse or more dangerous than other firearms.
To refute that, lets contrast the lethality of an AR-15 Americas most-common assault rifle with the lethality of a 12-gauge shotgun Americas most-common hunting gun. Which one would you rather get shot by? If it helps you decide, the average person shot by an AR-15 survives, while the average person shot by a 12 gauge dies in pieces.
Further, the common 12-gauge shotgun, firing one round of buckshot, sends more and bigger pieces of lead downrange than an entire 10-round magazine of AR-15 ammunition. And inasmuch as the most-common configuration of the 12-gauge shotgun holds six rounds, that means our friend the gentleman hunter can shoot more lead before having to reload than can someone with an assault rifle who empties two entire 30-round, high-capacity magazines.
The AR-15 shooter fires bullets .22 of an inch across. The buckshot shooter fires a bevy of bullets .33 of an inch across.
Let me repeat the question: Which one would you rather get shot by?
And how is it, exactly, that the assault rifle is the more dangerous of the two? What is the logic that insulates the shotgun and its owner from the gun-banning arguments brought against the assault rifle and its owner?
Another argument is that the assault rifle is somehow a weapon of extremists and oddballs, that the murderous psychos who shoot up innocent people are the face of the assault rifle. That doesnt jibe with the facts. The AR-15 is not a firearm of the fringe, it is the most-commonly sold rifle in America and has been for years on end.
Gun banners also claim that the AR-15 and other assault rifles arent used for hunting. Thats preposterous. Assault rifles, and other military rifles, are used for hunting all the time. The biggest thing holding the AR-15 back from being an even more popular hunting rifle is that its bullets arent big enough.
Thats right. Grampas deer rifle, the one the gun banners pretend to accept, is a ballsier gun than most assault rifles. It fires bigger, badder bullets that do a lot more damage to whatever they hit.
Gun banners say that the danger of the assault rifles is that they are semi-automatic. That they fire each time the trigger is pulled. In calling for a ban on such guns, they pretend not to know that semi-automatic hunting rifles and shotguns have been used by the millions for more than a century.
Gun banners also point to box magazines, saying that the ability to quickly reload is too uniquely dangerous. Thats nuts. Both hunting rifles and shotguns come with box magazines, and have for generations. There is nothing out of the ordinary about an assault rifles magazine.
Gun banners point to high-capacity magazines, ones that can hold a lot of bullets, and say that they are unjustifiably dangerous. Anyone who says that has never changed the magazine on an assault rifle in a live-fire situation. Magazines can be changed so rapidly on most modern firearms that it doesnt really matter, from a time standpoint, whether you use one 30-round magazine or three 10-round magazines. The high-capacity magazine is easier to carry, but not necessarily faster to shoot.
Gun banners in recent days have tried to divide and confuse gun owners by saying that civilians just shouldnt have weapons designed for the military.
At a certain level, thats an appealing argument. But accepting it requires you to know nothing about firearms and our history.
The cowboy gun, for example, the hog-leg single-action revolver, was designed as a military gun. The same for the lever-action rifles that today hunt deer over most of America. Some of the best bolt-action hunting rifles in use today are retooled from infantry rifles of the First World War. And for some 65 years the U.S. government itself has sold the combat rifles of the Second World War directly to civilians.
The AR-15 has merely done what every infantry rifle in American history has done before it crossed over into popular use and civilian ownership.
Finally, gun banners say that some guns are designed just to kill, and that they should not be allowed.
Well, actually, most guns are designed just to kill. The same is true for many types of legal and appropriate ammunition.
Handguns, as a class, are almost all designed to shoot people. Many of Grandpas favorite hunting rifles and shotguns were originally designed to shoot people.
Guns, after all, are often designed and used for self-defense. That may be an unpleasant reality, but its somewhat comforting when somebodys coming through your window in the dark of the night.
Assault rifles and high-capacity magazines are no different than any other gun. The gun banners wont tell you that, because the gun banners want to get rid of all guns.
They cant do that now.
But they can begin.
And theyve decided to begin with assault rifles and high-capacity magazines. They hope they can trick some gun owners into helping them.
They hope they can confuse some gun owners about what theyre after and what is at stake.
Maybe they will be successful.
But this much is certain, and every gun owner needs to recognize it: After they take your neighbors gun, they will come for yours.
After they vilify his gun, they will vilify yours.And in time you all will be disarmed together.
And that wont just take away your hunting, it will take away your freedom.
For this week.
And only for important topics.
Like this one.
“AR-15 Americas most-common assault rifle”
An AR15 is not an assault rifle. It is not select fire. It is a semi-automatic rifle like many others on the market, many of which are used for hunting and target shooting. It merely resembles an assault rifle.
Quit this nonsense crap about the people needing AR15s for home protection, hunting and to use in shooting competitions. That's a BS lie. You can' protect your home with a revolver or a pump shotgun. We need AR15s to protect ourselves from GOVERNMENT !!
When GOVERNMENTS come for your liberty they are not going to bring a revolver, they are going to bring a machine gun. THIS IS THE REASON WE MUST HAVE MILITARY WEAPONS IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE.
The truth needs to start with our side.
He has a point. The “assault rifle” in semi-automatic is not more dangerous than the common conception of most hunting rifles. I have a Remington 700 30-06 with a 3x9 scope. In the hands of a psycho killer on a rooftop, that gun would be deadly indeed. Seems to me that years ago, the crazy bell tower killer in Texas did exactly that.
Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it. Just a suggestion.
Let Freedom Ring,
“Ach!! Ve vill take yur guns!!!!”
OBAMA MACHT FREI
And 0bama listens to PSY and invites rappers to the WH.
F...U Cee Lo, anyone? Jay Z?
Das is Gut!!!
we'll see this sign above the gates of our internment camps!
I agree, I don't hunt and don,t care to. I get my meat from the grocery store. I don't spend weekends smoking ammo at the range for fun, when I go the the range it is to maintain proficiency and ensure the functionality and accuracy of my defensive weapons.
The guns I have are not for target shooting or hunting. They are solely for my protection and that of my family, friends and community. That is what they were designed for and why I have them. They are not recreational toys, they simply are tools of security.
Fine, ban semi-auto’s and high cap mags. So the next insane idiot shows up at a school with two S&W 686, 7 shot .357 magnum revolvers.
I suppose the progressives will consider the assault weapons ban to be a success because there are only 13 dead kids instead of 20.
People who want a state monopoly on something aren't against what they want to monopolize.
That can't be emphasized enough.