Skip to comments.A CALL FOR FULL DISCLOSURE IN THE GUN CONTROL DEBATE
Posted on 12/18/2012 8:16:59 AM PST by reformedcrat
What is missing in every gun-control discussion is a "full disclosure" of which politician has a concealed weapons permit, has any guns in his own home, or is protected by armed security guards. Just like the CNBC disclosure regarding touting stocks and the personal holdings of the person touting the stock, we need a "full disclosure" rule regarding armed protection of the politicians who advocate gun control.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/a_call_for_full_disclosure_in_the_gun_control_debate.html#ixzz2FQ8JHvJW
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
A great idea to expose the hypocrites.
Where be all the talk for gun control during Fast & Furious ?
How far would this evil little Newtown creep had made it if he had chosen to assault Congress? USSC? the White House? The local gun range? the local police department?
Yep. "Laws are for thee, but not for me. "
Everyone who works for the government should be forced into Obomacare as well. They wrote the law, so they should have to live with it, too.
If the politicians had to live with every law they ever wrote, they wouldn't have written them.
The president and congress are not protected by armed guards because they are closer to Gd than thee. They aren’t the politburo. They are protected because they are targets. Therefore any citizens who could be targeted should enjoy the same protection.
I remember that very well, her “fatness” was protesting against, I believe, K-mart for selling guns.
of course, rules should only apply to the common man, not the narcissists that are in power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.