Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guns, Mental Illness and Newtown
Wall Street Journal ^ | December 17, 2012 | DAVID KOPEL

Posted on 12/18/2012 11:27:06 AM PST by absalom01

Has the rate of random mass shootings in the United States increased? Over the past 30 years, the answer is definitely yes. It is also true that the total U.S. homicide rate has fallen by over half since 1980, and the gun homicide rate has fallen along with it. Today, Americans are safer from violent crime, including gun homicide, than they have been at any time since the mid-1960s.

...

Real gun-free zones are a wonderful idea, but they are only real if they are created by metal detectors backed up by armed guards. Pretend gun-free zones, where law-abiding adults (who pass a fingerprint-based background check and a safety training class) are still disarmed, are magnets for evildoers who know they will be able to murder at will with little threat of being fired upon.

People who are serious about preventing the next Newtown should embrace much greater funding for mental health, strong laws for civil commitment of the violently mentally ill—and stop kidding themselves that pretend gun-free zones will stop killers.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 2012; banglist; gunfreezone; kopel; lanza; newtown; sandyhook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2012 11:27:14 AM PST by absalom01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 12/18/2012 11:32:40 AM PST by BipolarBob (I survived the Lindsay Lohan Bar, Grill and Fight Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
I haven't heard a single person talk about THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM here.. No fathers in the homes that dispense a form of discipline that only a MAN can bring. No father figures or MEN in the schools. No father figures or MEN in daycare. We have a near 100% female-dominated oversight of boys with few men in the picture. Discipline must be firm and it must start with boys at an EARLY age, or else it's counterproductive. I have a feeling that when Adam DID have a father, he was a father in name only and not engaged or proactive with discipline. I'm not saying females can't enforce rules or be disciplinary; They CAN. However, with boys you need a MAN whom is feared, yet revered and respected and it MUST start at a young age.

Boys today are fatherless and fear NOTHING. Fatherlessness and FEARLESSNESS is the problem.

3 posted on 12/18/2012 11:37:47 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Ban high-capacity gun free zones.


4 posted on 12/18/2012 11:41:06 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
This is a HORRIBLE idea.

Letting the same organizations that brought us abortion and the normalization of homosexuality decide who is "sane" enough to possess a firearm is national suicide.

Anyone who thinks ANYTHING but the disarming of Christians/Patriots/Veterans will come of this this SEVERELY NAIVE.

I can't believe so many conservatives are falling for such a blatant attempt to divide and conquer.

Our boys didn't go soft and quit when they saw their buddies being mowed down on Normandy Beach, as horrible as it was. We too must not abandon our liberty teeth due to our recent similar horror.

We need to MAN UP, WISE UP and STAND UP. I won't disarm no matter what some commie shrink calls me !

5 posted on 12/18/2012 11:44:41 AM PST by SENTINEL (I lie, I cheat, I steal, I communize, I sacrifice unborn babies, I'm Harry Reid and I'm a mormon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
People who are serious about preventing the next Newtown should embrace much greater funding for mental health, strong laws for civil commitment of the violently mentally ill—and stop kidding themselves that pretend gun-free zones will stop killers.

(Calmly raises hand and says)Where's the funding going to come from? We don't have any money, and have overspent to the tune of $16 trillion already....

6 posted on 12/18/2012 11:47:40 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
Why Do They Want Our Guns?:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j73SsNFgBO4

7 posted on 12/18/2012 11:50:08 AM PST by Dick Bachert (An ARMED society is a POLITE society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Can’t wait for all this talk to be over. To be repeated exactly the same after the next massacre.


8 posted on 12/18/2012 11:52:22 AM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

It’s mental health and then some…
It’s feminized boys
It’s boys raised by women with no regular man in their lives
It’s medicating boys who are fidgety in class
It’s not letting boys be boys
It’s school that has no daily phy. ed.
It’s a culture of Everybody gets a Trophy
It’s “gender neutral” bathrooms
It’s “gender neutral” easy bake ovens
It’s self-esteem bestowed and not earned.

It’s main-streaming mentally ill people into everyday life and denying any of them should be institutionalized

It’s a mother who doesn’t lock her guns up so they can’t be accessed

It’s a mother who would rather be out drinking than caring for her son

It’s a mother who ignores the deep-seated problem illustrated by a boy who deliberately burns himself with a lighter.

It’s a mental health care system that is the most under-funded element of almost every health insurance plan. Medicare has had its mental health care elements gutted (effective 1/1/13).

It’s a mental health care system that is “outcome based.” The outcome is every person must be freed to walk the street. It’s the same system that does not hold a provider (doctor, therapist, counselor) responsible if/when he/she releases the wrong person.

It’s a mental health care system that exhausts parents of mentally ill children because even the most severely mentally ill child is almost always set home from the hospital when the latest crisis passes. Parents are made to believe it is their burden to carry no matter how impossible for them.

Or, we can just ban guns (especially the ones that look scary that we’ve politically decided to call assault weapons) so we can feel good about it.

And, then we all get a trophy for “caring.”


9 posted on 12/18/2012 11:53:44 AM PST by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
I think school districts could hire and retired and off-duty cops, part time, to provide security at schools. These personnel could carry sidearms and have ready access to an on-site gun safe containing riot guns, semi-auto rifles, flak vests, etc. This might be augmented by carefully screened volunteers. The presence of these guards might also reduce school drug dealing, bullying, and gang activity.
10 posted on 12/18/2012 12:01:01 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

So glad to have grown up in the 50’s/60’s. Raised our kids in the 80’s/90’s. Now to help them navigate thru all the mess the libs have left and have my grandkids come out normal. What a challenge that it.


11 posted on 12/18/2012 12:10:42 PM PST by SLB (23rd Artillery Group, Republic of South Vietnam, Aug 1970 - Aug 1971.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

During the time frame you reference, this country also had a system of mental hospitals where severely psychotic individuals could be cared for, and if necessary, confined. It wasn’t perfect, but it did work.

In the 1960’s, the ACLU brought a series of suits, and promoted a legislative agenda to “deinstitutionalize” the mentally ill, and place them in “community based” facilities.

Well, needless to say, that didn’t happen. The people who would have been in a mental hospital in 1944 were simply dumped out: in some cases families could provide care, but in many they formed the masses of the “homeless” that we heard about in the 1980’s.

Now, we’re told, by the very same liberals who advocated deinstitutionalization that we have to ban “assault weapons” because...wait for it....a psychotic might get ahold of one.


12 posted on 12/18/2012 12:34:28 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

During the time frame you reference, this country also had a system of mental hospitals where severely psychotic individuals could be cared for, and if necessary, confined. It wasn’t perfect, but it did work.

In the 1960’s, the ACLU brought a series of suits, and promoted a legislative agenda to “deinstitutionalize” the mentally ill, and place them in “community based” facilities.

Well, needless to say, that didn’t happen. The people who would have been in a mental hospital in 1944 were simply dumped out: in some cases families could provide care, but in many they formed the masses of the “homeless” that we heard about in the 1980’s.

Now, we’re told, by the very same liberals who advocated deinstitutionalization that we have to ban “assault weapons” because...wait for it....a psychotic might get ahold of one.


13 posted on 12/18/2012 12:34:38 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Yes, that is the meme that they are trying to sell.

Let’s not let them get away with it this time, hey?


14 posted on 12/18/2012 12:36:37 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
Incoherent. And this guy poses as a law expert. The fact is, we already have "strong civil commitment laws for the violently mentally ill." What this guy wants but won't come right out and say, is some kind of preventive detention law for confining someone found to be mentally ill who might become violent at some time in the future.

Thanks but no thanks. In the first place the potential for abuse is profound. For example, I can see this issue being used in every custody hearing from coast to coast, after being obscenely corrupted by our esteemed legal profession.

In the second place, this kind of violence is such a rare occurrence and the circumstances so indiosyncratic, that we have no reliable way to predict something like a "mass shooting." The FBI can't do it, the Secret Service can't do it, psychiatry can't do it, juries can't do it. I seriously doubt the sheriff in Podunk County can do it. And I don't think gut reactions count when it may be my freedom at stake.

In the third place, using his own numbers, 84% of murderers confined in state prisons are not mentally ill at all, so the very best this approach could do even in a perfect world would be to stop one out of six murders. Not much return for upending the very concept of "innocent until proven guilty."

15 posted on 12/18/2012 12:38:51 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

Exactly. I saw this coming years ago and began procurement then because I knew sooner or later this day would arrive.


16 posted on 12/18/2012 12:42:44 PM PST by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
.....this country also had a system of mental hospitals where severely psychotic individuals could be cared for, and if necessary, confined....

Have you ever tried to explain this to a Liberal, or for that matter, to a voter. This factual look at what the hell actually happened causes eyes to glaze over.

In hundreds of counties, there are abandoned mental hospitals, the only present use of which is as movie sets. Thanks to the ACLU, maybe instead of shotguns, the cops ought to carry dart guns loaded with Thorazine.

17 posted on 12/18/2012 12:46:08 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Say, whatever happened to Reggie Love?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j73SsNFgBO4


18 posted on 12/18/2012 12:48:14 PM PST by Dick Bachert (An ARMED society is a POLITE society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

It’s the “out darn spot” mentality. Because we have 26 murders, especially the fact that most of them were children, we have to come up with solutions to solve the problem even if it turns out that none of them would’ve prevented this from happening. The best way to deal with situations like these is not as much pre-emptive action as protective action when it may go down.

This reminds me of the hyperbole over hurricane Katrina. Over the years, ever since the early 1900s, hurricane fatalities have decreased with every successive storm but the way that Katrina was portrayed made it seem like it was the worst storm ever. Once we are all comfortable than outliers like this increase in exaggeration and size because the concept becomes more and more foreign to us.


19 posted on 12/18/2012 1:14:50 PM PST by Merta (Like Joe Jones, but in reverse, I talk too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Society would benefit a lot more by worrying about the mental health of people than by further limiting the right to own a gun.


20 posted on 12/18/2012 1:15:58 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson