Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CalPERS slams San Bernardino for 'sham' bankruptcy
Daily Bulletin/Reuters ^ | 16 December 2012 | Tim Reid, Jim Christie

Posted on 12/18/2012 6:26:35 PM PST by Lorianne

A high-stakes legal battle has intensified as the largest U.S. pension fund filed court papers denouncing the financially troubled city of San Bernardino for what it called a "sham" bankruptcy and accused the city of "criminal behavior" in withholding payments to the pension plan.

The filing on Friday by the California Public Employees' Retirement System, or CalPERS, came 10 days after San Bernardino officials traveled to Sacramento to plead with top CalPERS executives for more time to make payments.

At issue is whether the pensions of government workers take precedence over other payments in a municipal bankruptcy - which could have ramifications for municipal creditors, including Wall Street bondholders, as more cities and towns have trouble meeting their obligations.

No agreement was reached at the CalPERS-San Bernardino meeting, and CalPERS officials told Reuters they have little latitude to allow San Bernardino - or any other city that pays into its pension fund - to alter the payment schedule.

San Bernardino officials, for their part, say they also have no alternative - and sorely wish they did.

"Why would anyone put themselves through this level of pain - daily, recurring pain - to perpetrate a sham?" asked City Attorney James F. Penman. "You couldn't do that and be in good control of your mental faculties."

Penman said he hadn't yet seen CalPERS' most recent filing, but the bankruptcy is filling the minds of city officials.

"For CalPERS, it may be just another issue - we're one of hundreds of cities they have - but for us, every day that we go into work, every night that we're sitting at home thinking...there's an umbrella of sadness over us," he said, noting he met to discuss the bankruptcy Saturday with two City Council members and planned to meet Sunday night with Mayor Pat Morris. "These decisions are made after a lot of thought and usually a lot of dialogue, and for some of us a lot of prayer."

In a closely related action, bond insurers who are responsible for the debt of Stockton filed papers in that city's bankruptcy case denouncing CalPERS' efforts to be treated differently from other creditors. Stockton has continued to make payments to CalPERS while halting payments to some bondholders.

Both cities filed for bankruptcy in the wake of the housing market bust and years of financial mismanagement, and the two comparatively rare municipal bankruptcy cases are expected to set important precedents as to who gets paid when a government goes broke.

But while Stockton was well prepared when it filed for bankruptcy protection in June, San Bernardino's finances and government operations are in deep disarray as political factions battle one another, according to an ongoing Reuters investigation. The city filed for bankruptcy on Aug. 1 with no plans as to how it would meet its obligations.

CalPERS, which manages $241 billion in assets and serves many California cities and counties, said in its legal filing that San Bernardino appears to have been operating for more than a decade without necessary financial controls and lacks even basic mechanisms such as monthly cash-flow reports.

CalPERS said San Bernardino's proposed plan for operating in bankruptcy, filed last month, was "no plan at all."

"It is merely an attempt to buy time, at the expense of CalPERS and other post (bankruptcy) petition creditors," CalPERS said in arguing the city was not entitled to bankruptcy protection. CalPERS has already filed actions in state court, which could end up arbitrating the situation if bankruptcy protection is denied.

CalPERS accused the city of "criminal" conduct for not making pension payments that are part of employee compensation agreements.

In markedly aggressive language, CalPERS said the city had "buried its head in the sand," rather than deal with a long-standing financial crisis.

"The city gravely needs to get its house in order... Ten years of history suggest that the city is not going to implement meaningful change until forced to do so. This court needs to hold the city's feet to the fire."

San Bernardino is broke and can barely make payroll, city officials have said. It has not made its $1.2 million biweekly payments to CalPERS since the bankruptcy filing and now owes at least $8 million, in addition to a long-term debt to the fund that the city pegs at $143 million.

CalPERS argues that under California law it has primacy as a creditor, asserting that it is in essence an "arm" of the state and must continue to be paid in full, even in a bankruptcy.

Wall Street bondholders and insurers vehemently disagree, arguing that federal bankruptcy law trumps state authority and should allow them to fight with CalPERS in court as equal creditors.

Both sides have told Reuters they are willing to fight this issue all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which could take years.

In San Bernardino, the first city ever to deliberately halt payment to CalPERS, city officials are in a desperate scramble.

On Dec. 5 senior finance officials from San Bernardino met with CalPERS' chief executive officer and chief financial officer at the pension fund's Sacramento headquarters. The meeting lasted about 90 minutes.

According to CalPERS officials, the meeting was cordial and the city officials stressed that their plan to defer payments is made in good faith.

But in its court filing Friday, CalPERS alleged just the opposite, accusing the city of acting in bad faith in failing to propose a viable plan to meet its obligations.

CalPERS officials say it is highly unlikely they can accede to any proposal to defer payments.

"CalPERS does not have the power to 'negotiate' the amount of employer contributions owed by the city," Peter Mixon, CalPERS' general counsel, told Reuters. "The city of San Bernardino cannot alter the requirements of state law."

San Bernardino's acting city manager and finance director, both selected shortly before the city announced it planned to file for bankruptcy, did not return calls Friday.

But both have pointed to past decisions they say led to insolvency and said that since then the city has made substantial cuts and meaningful change, including 30 percent reductions to most city departments.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: calpers

1 posted on 12/18/2012 6:26:40 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Soon, very soon...

Many cities will collect tax money and spend not ONE DIME for any services for their citizens.

It will ALL go to public union pensions and benefits for retirees.

Public servants? Leeches that have killed their hosts even past death.

2 posted on 12/18/2012 6:33:24 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Fun times! Who to root for though?

Calpers invests in Wall Street stocks and bonds. Wall-Street wants to insure that it gets repaid for investing in a bad bet in California.

In the End though? California is going from the bowl of the Crapper into the sewer system. How soon before it gets to the Treatment plant and gets treated and sterilized to start the whole cycle all over again?

3 posted on 12/18/2012 6:35:03 PM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It should be highlighted that these payments are not for current obligations; these are not payments as part of payroll or for any current employee. The payments that Calpers is fighting over are payments of interest on the losses suffered by Calpers during the bust. Calpers is more than willing to defer the repayment of the principal lost, but it will not budge on the city paying for the interest those assets supposedly would be earning today.

It has become Calper’s magic wand; guaranteed assets that give a guaranteed 8-10% return. Phantom money that it lost through mismanagement of funds and political investing that cities and counties are obligated to pay for at some point, and more to the point, pay the interest on immediately.

I'm sure there's some financial genius on here that gets at least an 8% return on investment each and every year. But to do that as an institution while operating under a political agenda is a pretty far stretch. Especially with investments in green energy that has done only one thing - lost vast amounts of cash.

So, who am I rooting for in this? I'm rooting for the citizens of San Bernardino who should be, right now, bashing down the doors of city hall and demanding the city, and indeed, all of it's debts, be dissolved immediately.

Form a new city charter and incorporate again, and in the mean time, shed this outright usury from Calpers.

Oh, and a message to every other city and county in California: You can't survive this. There's no way possible for you to continue to use the Calpers charge card. The monthly payments are bankrupting your cities and counties, and you just have to say ‘enough is enough.’

4 posted on 12/18/2012 6:59:28 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Just what San Bernadino needs..another expensive legal battle.

5 posted on 12/18/2012 7:49:39 PM PST by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

If bondholders get stiffed, won’t interest rates for munis go WAY up?

6 posted on 12/18/2012 7:50:07 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

CalPERS calling “sham” on another entity?




7 posted on 12/18/2012 8:00:03 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Thought Puzzle: Describe Islam without using the phrase "mental disorder" more than four times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

After Calpers lost billions in the stock market, through fraud and mismanagement by employees and the pixie dust 8-10% expected return on investment, they simply passed all the losses onto the state and local government agencies as increased required payments. This is on top of the ridiculously high pensions in the first place.

8 posted on 12/18/2012 8:01:26 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (The law of unintended consequences is an unforgiving and vindictive b!tch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne


9 posted on 12/18/2012 8:05:11 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

this is pathetic.

every big shot creditor always files a motion claiming the bankruptcy filing is a sham.

10 posted on 12/18/2012 8:36:55 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! and
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Everyone needs to read this:

Back in the “When we had the Crook Gray Davis as our Governor” period, Ole Gray and the Legislature came up with SB400 (Thanks to Gloria Romero a Beaner State Senator). CalPers then was saying that it was all the land of milk and honey for the PE pensions under its “care.” All that was needed was for the Dow to be at 28,000 back about the time in 2007 that everything turned to crap. So they are in a world of hurt because, like the rest of us, their investment returns are less than half of what they need to be in order for them to be able to pay out the exorbitant benes for which they are currently liable.
So I’d like to see them in court to “explain” their situation “fully.” My guess is that they are trying the strong arm approach with the hope that the bankrupt cities will capitulate to their demands so they don’t have to fess up to a judge. At any rate, stock up on popcorn for this one!

11 posted on 12/19/2012 12:22:55 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson