F-—O-— puss nuts.
Hey Chrissie!...Go piss in the wind!
Come and get them...
We really need to “outlaw” commie fags like Matthews being on TV in a free country.
Good luck with that.
Semi-autos have been around for 100+ years. What’s different about them now?
Matthews should try Cuba, Venezuela or even Australia.....
Instead of pointing the finger at gun owners, why not look at Hollywood. Chris Rock just bragged that in his latest movie, “he got to kill all the white people.” Hollywood constantly glamorizes “life in the hood,” language that no one should be using in public and can’t get enough of the word “nigger,” and then THEY feel free to point fingers at other groups. ‘’’
No one - and I mean, no one, has more to do with the deterioration of decent behavior and lack of value on human life and decency than Hollywood. We should be pointing out in every blog and at every opportunity that Hollywood - instead of pointing outward - should be pointing at themselves.
If we had done what all the loudmouths had demanded over the last 60 years we would have NO firearms now.
Ban fruitcake talking heads. The 1st Amendment doesn’t say insane people should be given a national platform. /s
Chris is a dolt and the gungrabbers are just plain wrong, but this statement just isn't true.
OMG He forgot revolvers..
And this e-vil one!
Another freeper posted this yesterday. I think it bears repeating again that this is worth the 11 minutes to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhO0Pul_FcE
How ‘bout we outlaw whiny-@ss little b*tches like Crissy?
It may be time to start negotiating with Chrissy. If he’s interested in placing stringent, stipulated requirements for the exercise of a constitutional right, he might also approve of literacy and intelligence tests for voting. He might also consider the enactment of a lower threshold for a lawsuit against a so-called journalist for character assassination or jail time for plagiarists.
In all seriousness, did Matthews not understand the implications of what he was saying,
To be exact, Matthews never understands the implications of what he has ever said .... the fool just babbles to hear himself talk like the mental midgets over at CNN.
Not exactly.
The Miller decision of 1939 ruled, implicitly, that one need not be a member of a Militia to be covered by the Second Amendment. It also ruled that arms that are not useful to a Militia are not covered by the Second Amendment.
Lower court rulings have since that time seriously mis-applied that ruling, rendering their decisions rather meaningless except for the unwillingness of the Supreme Court to take appeals.
I haven't read any analysis that the Heller decision overruled the Miller decision, but that is the only reasonable conclusion. Because of that, any lower court rulings are very much outdated.
I would much rather outlaw Chris Mathews.