Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panetta says first F-35 overseas deployment planned for Iwakuni
Stars and Stripes ^ | December 19, 2012 | Stars and Stripes

Posted on 12/19/2012 1:59:27 AM PST by Jet Jaguar

Plans call for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to get its first overseas deployment in 2017 to Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni in line with the military’s “Pacific pivot,” according to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.

The F-35B Lightning II — the Navy and Marine Corps variant featuring short takeoff and vertical landing capabilities — has been billed as the next-generation stealth fighter despite complaints about noise and cost overruns. It can travel at speeds of Mach 1.6 — about 1,200 mph — and can land on ships or damaged runways, according to the web site for developer Lockheed Martin Corp.

Panetta’s comments came Tuesday at the National Press Club in Washington during a speech on defense strategy, including the shift of resources to the Pacific.

“We are also enhancing our presence and capabilities in the region,” Panetta said. “That includes reallocating the naval fleet to achieve in these next few years a 60/40 split between the Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans — hopefully, we will do that by 2020 — increasing Army and Marine presence in the region after Iraq and Afghanistan, locating our most advanced aircraft in the Pacific, including new deployments of F-22s and the MV-22 Ospreys to Japan, and laying the groundwork for the first overseas deployment of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to Iwakuni in 2017.”

Marine Corps officials at MCAS Iwakuni said they had not yet heard about the plans.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; looselips; navair
Whoops.
1 posted on 12/19/2012 1:59:33 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Whoops on the opsec slip, or whoops the F-35B won’t have achieved combat readiness by 2017?


2 posted on 12/19/2012 3:10:33 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

The F-35 costs a ton of money but so does the catapult system on a carrier.

From what I have seen this plane doesn’t need a catapult or trapping system.

That would mean a lot less men needed to crew the carrier and a lot less cost to build one to hold the F-35.\

Just a thought, I am sure others know more about it than I.


3 posted on 12/19/2012 3:55:05 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Wear the fox hat.


4 posted on 12/19/2012 5:12:36 AM PST by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson