Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Brown looking strong in initial special-election polling (For John Kerry's seat)
Hotair ^ | 12/20/2012 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 12/20/2012 9:46:29 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Maybe Scott Brown will become the Manny Mota of politics — the guy who excels at pinch-hitting. After having just lost a statewide election to hold onto the seat he won in a January 2010 special election, Republicans want him back as their nominee if John Kerry gets his expected Secretary of State appointment. And according to a new poll from Boston’s NPR affiliate WBUR, Brown leads all of the expected Democratic candidates, too (via Sarah Rumpf):

WBUR poll of 500 registered voters finds U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is in a strong position should there be a special election to fill U.S. Sen. John Kerry’s seat.

Kerry is believed to be President Obama’s choice to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The poll, conducted by the MassINC Polling Group on Monday and Tuesday, finds voters view Brown favorably, despite the fact that in November they chose to elect Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren in his stead. Fifty-eight percent of those polled say they have a favorable view of Brown, compared with 28 percent who view him unfavorably. Rounded off, 12 percent say they are undecided, and 1 percent say they have never heard of him. …

“We matched him up theoretically against (U.S. Reps.) Ed Markey, Mike Capuano, Steve Lynch and (former U.S. Rep.) Marty Meehan, and in each one of those cases, he led by between 17 and 19 points,” Koczela said.

Meehan, now the president of the University of Massachusetts Lowell, has already said he’s not interested in running.

The poll also pits him against his 2010 opponent, Martha Coakley, who doesn’t fare any better in a rematch. Brown actually pulls a majority in a head-to-head against Coakley, winning 51/36. The only other majority he gets comes against Steve Lynch, beating him by more than 2:1 at 51/24.

What about Deval Patrick? I doubt that Patrick wants to trade the governorship for a seat in the US Senate midway through his second term, but even if he did, he might not get it. Brown edges Patrick in this poll by seven points, 47/40, the closest any Democrat gets to Brown in this survey. Patrick is the only Democrat to get to the 40% level. Coakley actually does better than anyone but Patrick.

Clearly, Brown remains popular in Massachusetts, and without Barack Obama on the ticket and in a special election, he has a good chance to make a triumphant return to the US Senate in mid-spring. That may have Massachusetts Democrats dialing the 213 area code to look for a candidate.

— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) December 20, 2012


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 112th; brown; johnfkerry; johnkerry; kerry; ma2012; massachusetts; scottbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2012 9:46:36 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He won’t be getting any money from me this time.


2 posted on 12/20/2012 9:49:50 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." - Cornelius Tacitus, Roman Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As we say in Texas “Better than a sharp stick in the eye”...


3 posted on 12/20/2012 9:50:43 AM PST by ICCtheWay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’s toast after his support of gun control.


4 posted on 12/20/2012 9:52:06 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Look for the democrats in the state house to change the rules so that the appointed senator stays until the next regular election.

It seems every time there is a vacancy, they change the rules to help the democrats. And the state voters are OK with that.


5 posted on 12/20/2012 9:52:29 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, that explains why he just came out in favor of gun control. It didn’t seem to make much sense if he was dropping out of politics. Doesn’t make much sense, anyway, but that’s Taxachussets for you.

He’ll be our new Olympia Snowe.


6 posted on 12/20/2012 9:52:43 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
He’ll be our new Olympia Snowe.

About the best you can possibly expect from mASSachussetts.

7 posted on 12/20/2012 9:59:08 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Need to take into account turnout.

Brown can win a special election with low turnout; he obviously cannot win a presidential with the higher turnout.

He is more a politician and no conservative, but any seat from MA needs to be strategic - keep Reed (sicK!) from a filibuster-proof senate (presuming that matters).


8 posted on 12/20/2012 10:01:18 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

So, why didn’t he win the election for the seat in 2012? Is it possible that election fraud contributed to Warren’s election, or are the people in MA really that stupid? No, he isn’t a conservative, but like you said - he’s probably the best one can expect from that state.


9 posted on 12/20/2012 10:02:26 AM PST by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I really don’t understand why Brown just doesn’t run as a democrat.


10 posted on 12/20/2012 10:02:30 AM PST by bramps (Sarah Palin got more votes in 2008 than Mitt Romney got in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As many times as the mASSholes have changed their rules pertaining to replacing departing Senators, I’m surprised they haven’t simply enacted a rule that only a Kennedy can fill it.


11 posted on 12/20/2012 10:03:10 AM PST by ScottinVA (More dizzying than a Tilt-a-Whirl is an around-a-circle argument with a liberal about gun control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N
keep Reed (sicK!) from a filibuster-proof senate (presuming that matters)

I wonder if Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Hell) has phoned in his endorsement yet...

12 posted on 12/20/2012 10:07:47 AM PST by ScottinVA (More dizzying than a Tilt-a-Whirl is an around-a-circle argument with a liberal about gun control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Scott brown comes out in support of gay marriage and Freepers say he’s just saying that to get elected.

Scott Brown comes out in support of abortion and Freepers say he’s just saying it to get elected.

Scott Brown comes out in favor of gun control and the same FReepers say he’s just saying that to get elected.

Its no wonder the GOP is dying.


13 posted on 12/20/2012 10:08:17 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good news! There is an alternative.

Ted Kennedy Jr is being “urged” to run.

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_politics/2012/12/insiders_kennedy_jr_best_bet_vs_brown


14 posted on 12/20/2012 10:09:00 AM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
Ted Kennedy Jr is being “urged” to run.

Ah, yes... birthright.

15 posted on 12/20/2012 10:10:27 AM PST by ScottinVA (More dizzying than a Tilt-a-Whirl is an around-a-circle argument with a liberal about gun control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: C210N; Impy; Perdogg

“Brown can win a special election with low turnout; he obviously cannot win a presidential with the higher turnout.”

Perfect assessment.


16 posted on 12/20/2012 10:26:22 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (Time to musk up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How do you conduct a serious poll without including Vicki Kennedy and Ted Kennedy Jr.??? -tom


17 posted on 12/20/2012 10:28:29 AM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Now that he’s outed himself as a bonafide gun grabber, I hope he loses. We have no use for an anti 2nd amendment republican. They just let the enemy of the constitution claim bipartisanship for their diabolical agenda. Might as well just give dark blue states to the Dims rather then have these Linguine spine RINO’s gumming up the works.


18 posted on 12/20/2012 10:29:53 AM PST by Craigon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you are going to vote for a dimocrat... vote for a DEMOCRAT! Screw brown.

LLS


19 posted on 12/20/2012 10:36:23 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (A child is born in Bethlehem KING of KINGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bramps

Because only an outright Communist can win a MA Democrat party primary. Same goes for why the Maine twins. Socialists are too right-wing for New England Democrats.


20 posted on 12/20/2012 10:53:38 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson