“So would this mean if Obama came walking down your street or mind, that whatever weapons were owned by residents on said street, they would have to be surrendered first before The One deigned to walk down your street or mine?”
It wouldn’t be a problem as you know every gun free zone is definitely free of guns - all would immediately give up every gun for the Pres. to walk by. It’s a mystery how mass killings are done in gun free zones but not in gun areas. Maybe someone will figure out why that is.
We all already figured it out. It’s the brain dead stupid politicians, LSM, and all the other gun grabbers that haven’t figured it out.
I would rather have my tax dollars go to pay a security guard at my local school, or pay to have teachers and/or Administrators trained any day than to spend money protecting the dummy politicians.
I think you missed my point or else your reply to me is not very clear or your reasoning isn’t. I don’t know that “every gun free zone is definitely free of guns” and I don’t think anyone else does either unless every inch of the “zone” were searched by trained folks. Would everyone “immediately give up [their] every gun”? I’ve read that “mass killings are done in gun free zones but not in gun areas” but this seems to me to be quite easy to understand and accept, assuming it is in fact a true statement. I don’t know that it is true.