“.... so aren’t the rest of our children worth protection as well?”
Of course not, silly. Our children are peasants. They are simply cogs in a machine.. future work horses. The children at Sidwell Friends are “privileged” children. Thus, their lives are far more significant to our country than ours.
***It is actually more than annoying. It shows the disparity of those in “power” vs “those of us who aren’t”. What is truly frightening is how easy the politicians, media, celebrities etc.. who are so willing to protect their precious kids and allow our babies to be targets.
prolefeed: the steady stream of mindless entertainment to distract and occupy the masses
George Orwell described the attitude of socialists towards the proles (plebs, Rome; lumpen proletariat, Marx): “Proles are not human beings.”
They would not consider the safety and well-being of our children by guarding them anymore than they would post guards at cattle feedlots, except to keep them from escaping.
Surely you have noticed that when the subject is raised—as LaPierre did the other day—about protecting public schools, as private schools are protected, the MSM quickly denigrates the idea (”More guns in schools?!”) and turns the subject back to gun confiscation.
“Gun control” isn’t about controlling guns; It’s about control, period. And I know—don’t call you `Shirley.’
“What is truly frightening is how easy the politicians, media, celebrities etc.. who are so willing to protect their precious kids and allow our babies to be targets.”
But if they did not set up school children in defenseless victim zones, how would they justify disarming the people?