Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/26/2012 6:33:48 AM PST by suspects
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: suspects

There are 3 States where the republicans ought to save their money and quit wasting time trying to get candidates elected. They are California, Mass. and NY. Even if they suceeded, the result would be a RINO.


2 posted on 12/26/2012 6:41:32 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects; All

Brown could not even hold on to his seat against a ultra-liberal phony Native American....how in the world would he beat a Liberal Dem with No Baggage in Mass?

GOP would be better off running a real conservative in Mass...if one does exist


3 posted on 12/26/2012 6:41:54 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Fiscal Conservatives are Neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
Some 54 percent of Massachusetts voters have a favorable view of Brown, and he’s leading in head-to-head match-ups with his likely opponent. So Scott’s a shoo-in!
Oh, wait — those are the polls from the end of October. Right before Brown got crushed by Liz Warren 53 percent to 46 percent.

2012 is the year of the parasitic voter. Odds are, the uninformed and unaware of the damage they were doing, probably just voted straight ticket. Had it not been a "Parasites for Oboma 2012" year and just a mid term election, I don't think the communist would have won. She just rode in on the "Vote for me = a freebie for thee" coat tail.

4 posted on 12/26/2012 6:44:29 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
Hey scott... you traitorous pos poser... switch parties you puke... if you are going to govern as a communist... then admit that you are one.

LLS

6 posted on 12/26/2012 6:49:48 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (A child is born in Bethlehem KING of KINGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

Given the choice between a RINO and a card-carrying communist (Democrat), the Masshole will always vote for the communist.


7 posted on 12/26/2012 6:51:50 AM PST by bobcat62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

Because he’s a worthless, finger in the wind politician who will pull a Jim Jeffords when he begins to be “uncomfortable” with the Republican Party. I didn’t vote for him last month and will not vote for him again.


11 posted on 12/26/2012 7:08:15 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

What MA GOP?????


12 posted on 12/26/2012 7:10:31 AM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

Waste of time. With all the ammunition against the faux Indian princess, he still couldn’t sell the voters to re-elect him.

He tried to win them over with some RINO political shift to the left on some issues, but why wouldn’t Democrats want the real thing.

He was a nice lucky young man to win the seat the first time. Now it’s time to go back home and reconfigure a career.


14 posted on 12/26/2012 9:57:40 AM PST by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

Romney was the fourth republican governor in a row there, and he was a disaster for the state GOP, turned the seat over to the democrats, and left office with a 34% approval rating.


15 posted on 12/26/2012 10:40:26 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney--guns not for recreation or self-defense"sole purpose of hunting down and killing people".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

“The Republican Party doesn’t have a candidate problem — it’s hard to imagine a better candidate than Brown. It has a brand problem. And until the GOP fixes it, it doesn’t matter which Republican runs. Because they’ll lose.”

Absolutely correct.

It’s not so much a “candidate problem” as it is a “constituency problem”. In that in some states, the majority of the voting population has moved so far to the left, that it will never vote for ANY candidate that calls himself/herself “Republican” again.

Even in the deep blue states, it’s still possible for a Republican to get elected here or there, to local offices. But there are states like Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island, Connecticut and perhaps some others where the chances of a Pubbie candidate winning statewide office (governor, U.S. senator) are next to zero. Conservative or RINO, if they have the “Republican brand” the voters in those states are going to run the other way.

I suppose the same thing could be said about many ‘rat candidates in the deep red states, although ‘rats in red states seem to be more electable than are Republicans in blue states.

Perhaps since they’re almost certain to lose anyway, we should wish for the most conservative candidates to come forth in the blue states. At least they will define the issues before the public...


16 posted on 12/26/2012 2:37:51 PM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson