Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Source: Reid looking for votes on fiscal cliff package
CNN ^ | 12/26/12 | Dana Bash

Posted on 12/26/2012 3:01:03 PM PST by jimbo123

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in conjunction with the White House, is working to see if the scaled back fiscal cliff package President Barack Obama laid out last week can get through Congress before December 31st.

Reid has made clear in private conversations he does not want to bring any bill to the Senate floor unless he is sure it will pass both the Democratic-led Senate and the Republican-held House.

-snip-

It is still an open question, however, whether the vote threshold in the Senate would be a majority, or whether it would be 60 votes. That will depend on what Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Reid work out.

As far as the House goes, Democrats believe if they can get a bill through the Senate, it is likely they can get it through the House with most Democrats voting yes and, Democrats hope, about 30 or so House Republicans crossing party lines.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
So Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are supposed to rally the Senate and House RINOs to vote for the Reid-Obama plan?
1 posted on 12/26/2012 3:01:09 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

SCREW’M....over the edge now


2 posted on 12/26/2012 3:04:22 PM PST by ptsal (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

My advice to Boehner & McConnell, go cliff diving and let the next Congress begin to address it. And do not increase the debt limit - FUBO.


3 posted on 12/26/2012 3:04:40 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Not if it includes unlimited debt ceiling language and years long extension of unemployment..just where are the spending cuts???? 2 dollars or more in cuts for every dollar of spending. Whatever happened to the 5% solution..everybody cuts 5% from their budget. Geez, corporations do this all the time. Fed up with these people.


4 posted on 12/26/2012 3:05:39 PM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

You bring up a good point on letting the next Congress take it up. I remember back in early Nov or so that Boehner said in a press conference something to the effect of “....one thing is for sure this will not be handled in a lame-duck Congress.” Don’t know if that idea still holds with him though.


5 posted on 12/26/2012 3:14:07 PM PST by bunster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

“...about 30 or so House Republicans crossing party lines.”

This time Boehner won’t be providing cover for the RINOs.
It will be very interesting ro see who doesn’t care if they’re reelected, or removed from their plum committees or even chairmanships.


6 posted on 12/26/2012 3:15:38 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

F Reid and his package....


7 posted on 12/26/2012 3:20:46 PM PST by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
Whatever happened to the 5% solution..everybody cuts 5% from their budget. Geez, corporations do this all the time.

Does that include cutting Medicare and SS payments? We have 10,000 people a day retiring and they will continue to do so each and every day for the next 20 years. There are 58 million on SS and 47 million on Medicare now. There are also 70 million on Medicaid and 47 million on food stamps.

8 posted on 12/26/2012 3:30:35 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Over the cliff. If any conservative that gives a damn should be able to frame this squarely on numbnuts.


9 posted on 12/26/2012 3:35:25 PM PST by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

It is an across the board cut.


10 posted on 12/26/2012 3:37:21 PM PST by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Reid said he would not work with Romney, had Romney won the election.

I think we REMIND Reid of that statement, over and over and over again!


11 posted on 12/26/2012 3:47:00 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

BOHICA


12 posted on 12/26/2012 4:19:39 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“Does that include cutting Medicare and SS payments?”

No, not payments..those are obligations. But you can be certain that they can find 5% of fat that can be trimmed in administrative costs and other overhead functions. Travel, percs, office equipment, heck, even stationary.

Every company I ever worked for figured out ways to reduce their overhead and did it regularly. They did it and stayed in business. Why shouldn’t we expect the same from government?


13 posted on 12/26/2012 4:19:51 PM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Let me guess: its ALL spending and no cuts. Not even imaginary cuts.


14 posted on 12/26/2012 4:30:57 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

FUHR. You despicable tyrant. ESAD.


15 posted on 12/26/2012 4:40:56 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

“YOUR public debt.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Au2-J-3on0


16 posted on 12/26/2012 4:43:25 PM PST by maxsand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
RE :”It is still an open question, however, whether the vote threshold in the Senate would be a majority, or whether it would be 60 votes. “

If you use budget reconciliation (requires 51) then you just delay it another 8 years, which is why the tax cuts expired at end of 2010.

17 posted on 12/26/2012 7:06:47 PM PST by sickoflibs (Dems know how to win. Rs know how to whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
Two-thirds of the budget is spent on the entitlement programs and debt servicing costs. You must reduce spending by more than 5% for the to other third of the budget (including defense, which is about 20%) if you want to cut spending overall by 5%.

And how do you factor in inflation in terms of the cuts?

18 posted on 12/26/2012 9:33:24 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Across the board? So you cut Medicare, SS, Medicaid, food stamps, etc. by 5%? Do you really think that Congress would ever pass such cuts? And what would the public reaction be?


19 posted on 12/26/2012 9:35:37 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson