Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/28/2012 8:30:02 AM PST by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Perseverando

Is this like “rape rape?”


2 posted on 12/28/2012 8:33:55 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile has killed more people than my guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando
Pitiful old woman..Would we have been better off if her mother had an abortion..
4 posted on 12/28/2012 8:44:07 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

*


8 posted on 12/28/2012 9:46:07 AM PST by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando
sorry wnd.. is in fact distorting what she said. While I disagree with Ginsburg on most issues, I detest when the left takes quotes out of context. The full quote is this:

"JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

No explanation is necessary here... she is clearly stating that many people were afraid that MEDICAID funded abortion was being set up to coerce certain population groups of women into terminating their pregnancies.

10 posted on 12/28/2012 10:13:34 AM PST by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando

Ruth is a angry little woman with too much power. She cannot make good law and our country will suffer long after she is at room temperature.


11 posted on 12/28/2012 10:17:04 AM PST by bmwcyle (We have gone over the cliff and we are about to hit the bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando
of course abortion is about eugenics and population control.

Our medical school instructors pushing it on us always "hinted" that as the real reason, and anyone who checks left wing human rights websites know that the National Security study memo 200 paper was written for the state department for Nixon and has been pushing population control since Carter okayed it. link

And the Philippines has just passed a law for free birth control at government clinics, and fining medical personnel if they talk against it. This was passed to please our American masters, not to help women.

I mean, why fund birth control when 40 percent of women give birth without a trained birth attendant? To please Obama...

and three days later, the US announced they changed their mind and will help us defend China from grabbing land off our coasts. Coincidence?

16 posted on 12/28/2012 12:15:55 PM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson