Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laws are for Little People [Steyn]
National Review ^ | 12/28/2012 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 12/29/2012 6:38:05 AM PST by Servant of the Cross

And not for David Gregory.

A week ago on NBC’s Meet the Press, David Gregory brandished on screen a high-capacity magazine. To most media experts, a “high-capacity magazine” means an ad-stuffed double issue of Vanity Fair with the triple-page perfume-scented pullouts. But apparently in America’s gun-nut gun culture of gun-crazed gun kooks, it’s something else entirely, and it was this latter kind that Mr. Gregory produced in order to taunt Wayne LaPierre of the NRA. As the poster child for America’s gun-crazed gun-kook gun culture, Mr. LaPierre would probably have been more scared by the host waving around a headily perfumed Vanity Fair. But that was merely NBC’s first miscalculation. It seems a high-capacity magazine is illegal in the District of Columbia, and the flagrant breach of D.C. gun laws is now under investigation by the police.

This is, declared NYU professor Jay Rosen, “the dumbest media story of 2012.” Why? Because, as CNN’s Howard Kurtz breezily put it, everybody knows David Gregory wasn’t “planning to commit any crimes.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gregory; guncontrol; laws; secondamendment; steyn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

1 posted on 12/29/2012 6:38:17 AM PST by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JLS

Steyn ping.


2 posted on 12/29/2012 6:39:06 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
>>>This is, declared NYU professor Jay Rosen, “the dumbest media story of 2012.” Why? Because, as CNN’s Howard Kurtz breezily put it, everybody knows David Gregory wasn’t “planning to commit any crimes.” CNN’s Howard Kurtz is off his game & dumb to boot. What's wrong w/ CNN these days, any check & balances going on there?
3 posted on 12/29/2012 6:47:12 AM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Isn’t Steyn a gem? Just love him.


4 posted on 12/29/2012 6:49:14 AM PST by miss marmelstein ( Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
To most media experts, a “high-capacity magazine” means an ad-stuffed double issue of Vanity Fair with the triple-page perfume-scented pullouts

Lols! I am not 4 sentence in and I already am cracking up at Mark Styen's Wit.

All good satire has truth in it and that is 100% right on!

5 posted on 12/29/2012 6:52:02 AM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Just a minute. If Wayne Lapierre had held the same magazine, liberals all over would be calling for his conviction.

Liberalism = hypocrisy.


6 posted on 12/29/2012 6:55:05 AM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Intent in this case was possession, that was the criminal action. The lefties in congress specifically designed the law that way. Now one of their ‘useful idiots’ has become entangled in what was designed to catch us Bitter Clingers up short. Oh the drama!! Will be interesting to see how this plays out...keep watching page Z 99 for more details on how they sweep it all under the rug. Will be delightful to see the logically gymnastics used to let him walk but still vilify us Clingers. Te left is worthless!


7 posted on 12/29/2012 6:57:46 AM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
If Wayne Lapierre had held the same magazine, liberals all over would be calling for his conviction.

That's the fact, Jack!

8 posted on 12/29/2012 6:59:52 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Thanks S/C---- Does it seem that we are headed for a two tier legal system, where you are prosecuted only if you aren't connected to certain political groups? This would be a way to keep out any who might challenge you in social or business ways . You see this in Latin America where the ‘unwashed’ are pushed down and not allowed to rise by denying the entrance into business or certain schools or even the opportunity to start a business thru endless permitting challenges...
9 posted on 12/29/2012 7:06:16 AM PST by virgil283 ( "He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Sometimes a society becomes too stupid to survive.

Or half of it, anyway.

10 posted on 12/29/2012 7:11:34 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Why are only weapon-related items ever “brandished”?


11 posted on 12/29/2012 7:12:17 AM PST by Corey Ohlis (Visualize Swirled Peas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283
This is what political correctness is all about. I was a military civil rights investigator at one point and believe me there are definitely things one class of people can do that another can't. If we are treated differently for the same behavior can we all be free? We are about to the point where Lao Tsu is said to have left China due to too many laws that kept people from living naturally. Our Founding Fathers recognized Natural Law and wrote a Constitution to restrict government from infringing on it. But government is about power, and eventually this is what you get.
12 posted on 12/29/2012 7:15:39 AM PST by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: facedown
I would be ok with a plague taking out the left half.

LLS

13 posted on 12/29/2012 7:20:07 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Spending a weekend with this guy and a few friends would do wonders for my soul.


14 posted on 12/29/2012 7:21:56 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Sometimes a society becomes too stupid to survive. Eleven-year-old girls fined for rescuing woodpeckers, serving Marines put on the no-fly list, and fifth-generation family cats being ordered into separate compounds with “electric wire” fencing can all testify to how near that point America is.

Just think about that for a minute. Electing Obama for a second term pretty much puts a bow on it.

15 posted on 12/29/2012 7:29:52 AM PST by oldbrowser (They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Should David Gregory be treated more leniently than a domestic cat just because when Obama tickles his tummy he licks the president’s hand and purrs contentedly?

LOL!!!

America’s gun-crazed gun-kook gun culture

Thought Steyn was going to do one of his little pivots here and point out the people who really should be called gun-crazed gun-kooks are those one track monomaniacs who are insanely obsessed and preoccupied with guns; namely, elite leftists like Gregory.

16 posted on 12/29/2012 7:49:44 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil283

Right - another example is Obamacare waivers. Those who supported passage get waivers; those opposed do not.


17 posted on 12/29/2012 8:05:09 AM PST by jtal (Runnin' a World in Need with White Folks' Greed - since 1492)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Gregory needs to be prosecuted under the District’s gun laws. He not only was in possession of the high capacity magazine, someone had to buy it and intentionally smuggle it into the District unless it was purchased illegally within the District. The NRA should be demanding Gregory be prosecuted for violation of local gun laws just like any law abiding NRA member would be for doing the same thing. To not prosecute Gregory would show the utter hypocrisy and absurdity of these gun laws.


18 posted on 12/29/2012 8:16:46 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
S O L O N The Lawmaker of Athens (died 559 B.C.) by Plutarch

Athens, unlike Sparta, was a money-mad commercial city. The constitution written by Solon mitigated the class struggle between rich and poor, and allowed for the growth of democratic institutions.

Solon was born into a well-to-do family of Athens. He worked as a merchant in the export-import trade, and he considered himself relatively poor. He did not worship money, as is evident from these poems of his:

The man whose riches satisfy his greed

Is not more rich for all those heaps and hoards

Than some poor man who has enough to feed

And clothe his corpse with such as God affords.

I have no use for men who steal and cheat;

The fruit of evil poisons those who eat.

Some wicked men are rich, some good men poor,

But I would rather trust in what's secure;

Our virtue sticks with us and makes us strong,

But money changes owners all day long.

Poetry was for Solon a way to entertain himself, and he also used poetry to give his ideas easy access to the minds of the Athenians.

The seven wise men of Greece were well-known, both to each other and to the general public. Anacharsis, who was one of these wise men, came to visit Solon in Athens. When Anacharsis saw Athenian democracy at work, he remarked that it was strange that in Athens wise men spoke and fools decided. Solon admired this man's ready wit and he entertained Anacharsis as his guest for a long time. Solon showed Anacharsis some laws that he was drafting for the Athenians. Anacharsis laughed at Solon for imagining that the dishonesty and greed of the Athenians could be restrained by written laws. Such laws, said Anacharsis, are like spiderwebs: they catch the weak and poor, but the rich can rip right through them.

19 posted on 12/29/2012 8:25:59 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIRTRIS

Unfortunately for him, Gregory was indeed planning to commit a crime: the crime of possessing a high capacity magazine in DC. And he did commit the crime.

Let’s see how he likes gun laws.


20 posted on 12/29/2012 8:31:10 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Gregory needs to be prosecuted under the District’s gun laws. He not only was in possession of the high capacity magazine, someone had to buy it and intentionally smuggle it into the District unless it was purchased illegally within the District.

Not only did he violate D.C. gun laws, but according to D.C. police [who have confirmed multiple times], he knowingly violated the law after being denied the use of the illegal magazine on the show.

21 posted on 12/29/2012 8:32:39 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: virgil283
Does it seem that we are headed for a two tier legal system, where you are prosecuted only if you aren't connected to certain political groups?

Gonzalo Lira: Structural Pliancy

22 posted on 12/29/2012 9:25:58 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DPMD

“Gregory was indeed planning to commit a crime”

Exactly. A ‘crime’ is defined as a joint union of act and intent.
Here the crime is possession. NBC and Gregory hoisted themselves on their own petard.
And from what I’ve read they compounded the crime by lying about getting permission from the DC police.
Nothing unusual about the MSM lying but that’s not ordinarily a crime, just `artistic license.’


23 posted on 12/29/2012 9:39:39 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Sometimes a society becomes too stupid to survive.

Or half of it, anyway.

Unfortunately, they're the half in full control of the country--government, education, and culture.

24 posted on 12/29/2012 9:44:46 AM PST by Junior_G (Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady; Rummyfan; Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; ...

Mark Steyn ping. This is a really apt column.

Freepmail me, if you want on or off the Mark Steyn ping list.

Thanks for the ping Servant of the Cross.


25 posted on 12/29/2012 10:36:40 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady; Rummyfan; Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; ...

Mark Steyn ping. This is a really apt column.

Freepmail me, if you want on or off the Mark Steyn ping list.

Thanks for the ping Servant of the Cross.


26 posted on 12/29/2012 10:36:40 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Standard Steyn.
Keen eye and wit.


27 posted on 12/29/2012 11:02:36 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
"“Do you really think we want those laws observed?" Said Dr. Ferris. We want them broken. You better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against - then you'll know this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We're after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick and you'd better get wise to it. There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now, that's the system Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."

Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, Part 2, Chapter 3, Page 404

28 posted on 12/29/2012 11:13:39 AM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corey Ohlis
Well, Steyn brandishes wit.

I am interested in why nobody ever "blurts out" a lie. I suppose it's a testament to the spontaneity of truth.

29 posted on 12/29/2012 11:15:49 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts. - Sergeant Joe Friday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JLS
I thought this -- from the comments section at NRO -- was worth passing along:

"I'm willing to be civil and obey laws I don't like for the sake of preserving civility, and out of respect for a legitimate process of government. But cover ups, lies, delay tactics, diversions, and caprice destroy my desire to be civil, and give me cause to have nothing but contempt for the big people above the law.

Wouldn't anarchy, total and pure animalistic anarchy, be a notche higher, in terms of justice, than a system where laws only apply to the little people?

I notice a strange paradox, that the system of government we are being saddled with is only approved of by the ones who do not have to abide by it.

I'm startled and frightened by the legitimacy to lawlessness the example of our administration is giving the people of America."

30 posted on 12/29/2012 11:17:01 AM PST by wolf24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Save for later


31 posted on 12/29/2012 11:23:23 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (When Robbing Peter To Pay Paul,One Can Always Count On Paul's Cooperation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ; Servant of the Cross; JLS
The NRA should be demanding Gregory be prosecuted for violation of local gun laws...To not prosecute Gregory would show the utter hypocrisy and absurdity of these gun laws.

The NRA and the right have a serious opportunity here.

The argument for letting him walk rests on his membership of a protected class — the media. Notwithstanding that (per Gallup) 54 percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the NRA while only 40 percent have any trust in the media, the latter regard themselves as part of the ruling class.

The BS media doesn't deserve that limited degree of credibility that it has, 40 percent. It also shows the gullibility of the left.

The NRA and the right need to demand that Gregory be prosecuted, or that idiotic law prohibiting high capacity magazines be repealed. The government has a history of abandoning not just their own at Benghazi, but innocent civilians as well.

WHEN ‘ASSAULT WEAPONS’ SAVED KOREATOWN

High-Capacity-Magazine Bans: Threatened shopkeepers used 30-round magazines to fire warning shots and avoid taking lives.

It's time to go after the BS media hammer and tong. They were complicit in giving the government pass on innocent dead from Ruby Ridge, Idaho and Waco, Texas to Fast and Furious.

32 posted on 12/29/2012 11:33:29 AM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Beautiful and right to the point!


33 posted on 12/29/2012 11:39:03 AM PST by Gritty (I don't believe that people should be able to own guns-Barack Obama response to John Lott, 1996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Steyn’s command of the English language and of several others continues to enlighten and entertain me.

Here he describes the federal Fish & Wildlife officer issuing a $535 fine to “eleven-year-old Skylar Capo [who] made the mistake of rescuing a woodpecker from the jaws of a cat and nursing him back to health for a couple of days” as a “gauleiter”.

“Gauleiter” - What an apt term!

Definition of GAULEITER
1a : a district leader in Nazi Germany who served as a provincial governor
1b : a subordinate political official resembling a Nazi gauleiter in function or in autocratic manner
2: a person with an arrogant overbearing outlook or manner

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gauleiter

Ah, Steyn... Once again, out of the park!


34 posted on 12/29/2012 11:47:40 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“...insanely obsessed and preoccupied with guns; namely, elite leftists like Gregory.”

They just can’t wait to get us unarmed. Look what they are doing to the Constitution now, for cripes sake.


35 posted on 12/29/2012 11:53:47 AM PST by jessduntno ("If you give listeners a choice between NPR and NPR, they’ll pick NPR every time." - Howie Carr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Wow, just WOW!

Understand that, plus H.L. Mencken’s quote and you understand current politics.

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”
H. L. Mencken

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/hlmencke101109.html#iHXw2V7hMjVg6cps.99

I would probably add Rush’s euphemism of “low-information voter” plus:

Lord Acton: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

And finally, Alexis de Tocqueville: “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”

There is your college level course in Political Science.

For a Graduate Level course, include:

“But Jesus would not entrust himself to them, for he knew all men.” John 2:24

“I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.” Matt 10:16


36 posted on 12/29/2012 12:09:58 PM PST by BwanaNdege ("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
"But don’t be fooled: These people who claim they want the end of regulations don’t want to help us—they want to exploit us. ......Thanks..'V'
37 posted on 12/29/2012 12:11:46 PM PST by virgil283 ( "He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

Miss Rand understood the looter mentality.


38 posted on 12/29/2012 12:16:05 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DPMD

>>>Unfortunately for him, Gregory was indeed planning to commit a crime: the crime of possessing a high capacity magazine in DC. And he did commit the crime</b>Will Gregory plead ignorace or did he have a crack researh team advising him the all clear? Stupidity is no excuse!!


39 posted on 12/29/2012 12:25:29 PM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DPMD
>>>Unfortunately for him, Gregory was indeed planning to commit a crime: the crime of possessing a high capacity magazine in DC. And he did commit the crimeWill Gregory plead ignorace or did he have a crack researh team advising him the all clear? Stupidity is no excuse!!
40 posted on 12/29/2012 12:25:56 PM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

Hi Alfred, I was just reading your post on the difference between “unalienable” and “inalienable”. I found it quite interesting.

I was also reading an article about President Obama omitting “Creator” when quoting the Declaration (http://www.wnd.com/index.phpfa=PAGE.view&pageId=237349) when I noticed that he repeatedly uses “inalienable”. The omission of the one word and the incorrect usage of the other in numerous instances can only be intentional. He’s very consistent about it. I was curious about your thoughts on this.

Matt At the time, I responded briefly. However, here’s an expanded version of my reply:

In the context of American history, the terms “Creator” and “unalienable Rights” appear first and most famously in our “Declaration of Independence” of July 4th, A.D. 1776. There, in its second sentence, theDeclaration offers the single most radical statement of truth in at least 2,000 years of Western political thought:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Prior to our Declaration, the nations of the western world were governed by monarchies where only one man—the king—was deemed to be sovereign. The king was sovereign because he, and he alone, was deemed to have been directly endowed by the God of the Bible (the earthly king’s “Creator”) with the “divine right of kings”. That endowment of God-given rights did not attach as a result of an election or human appointment. That endowment attached as the result of a “coronation ceremony” that took place in the highest church within the nation.

The king would wear a crown of gold and jewels which was intended to symbolize the glittering “corona” seen around the heads of the Christ and saints in medieval paintings. The crown didn’t simply represent the king’s secular or political authority; it represented his spiritual authority. Because the king, and only the king, got his rights directly from God, the king had a special spiritual status (sovereignty) that no other man living in that kingdom could match.

We can see some confirmation of these observations in the rules of chess and the design of classic chess pieces. In the classic chess piece design, the king alone has a cross on the top of his crown. That cross symbolizes that the king is directly “endowed by his Creator” with the “divine right of kings” and is therefore sovereign.

Under the rules of chess, you can “kill” (remove from the chess board of “life”) all of the other pieces. If an opponent lands on a pawn, knight, bishop, rook or queen, that piece is effectively “killed” and removed from the board. But the opponent can never “kill” the king. You can checkmate the king by putting him in circumstances where he is both threatened with “death” and unable to move to another, safer location. You can even accidentally put the king in a circumstance where he is not “in check” (being directly threatened) but can’t move without moving into “check” (death).

The king, and king alone, had the “divine right of kings”—which included an unalienable Right to Life. You could capture a chess king, but you could never, never, lawfully “kill” him.

finish the story here:
http://adask.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/god-given-unalienable-rights-individual-sovereignty/


41 posted on 12/29/2012 12:41:14 PM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
The argument for letting him walk rests on his membership of a protected class — the media. Notwithstanding that (per Gallup) 54 percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the NRA while only 40 percent have any trust in the media, the latter regard themselves as part of the ruling class.
. . . which is precisely my point when I say that journalists do not respect the First Amendment as it relates to anyone outside their club.
And their “club” is defined by going along and getting along with the consensus of what is convenient for journalism as such. Which is how stories such as the Trayvon Martin case get fit into the standard "white-American-him-bad” template.

42 posted on 12/29/2012 12:49:44 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Check out link if you want to see Jay Rosen at his creepiest... (he’s probably worse in real life - but this offers a hint...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBFOmUXR080


43 posted on 12/29/2012 1:00:15 PM PST by GOPJ (It's not possible to be a Progressive and not be a hypocrite. Freeper TigersEye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Check out link if you want to see Jay Rosen at his creepiest... (he’s probably worse in real life - but this offers a hint...) New York Times folks in full bloom...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBFOmUXR080


44 posted on 12/29/2012 1:02:23 PM PST by GOPJ (It's not possible to be a Progressive and not be a hypocrite. Freeper TigersEye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; marktwain; sickoflibs; Liz
When the D.C. SWAT team, the FBI, and the ATF take out NBC News and the whole building goes up in one almighty fireball, David Gregory will be the crazed loon up on the roof like Jimmy Cagney in White Heat: “Made it, Ma! Top of the world!” At last, some actual must-see TV on that lousy network.

But, even if we’re denied that pleasure, the “dumbest media story of 2012” is actually rather instructive. David Gregory intended to demonstrate what he regards as the absurdity of America’s lax gun laws. Instead, he’s demonstrating the ever greater absurdity of America’s non-lax laws. His investigation, prosecution, and a sentence of 20–30 years with eligibility for parole after ten (assuming Mothers Against High-Capacity Magazines don’t object) would teach a far more useful lesson than whatever he thought he was doing by waving that clip under LaPierre’s nose.

ping

45 posted on 12/29/2012 1:09:32 PM PST by GOPJ (It's not possible to be a Progressive and not be a hypocrite. Freeper TigersEye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Thanks for the headsup.

THRIVING ON CHAOS The disturbed Obamatons are creating a dysfunctional chaotic culture, The anti-social psychopaths recognize no moral and ethical boundaries----aggressively going after what they want, irregardless of the consequences.

Para-military Dem liberals and progs, are aiding and abetting a cabal of hate-filled individuals----all of them lying in wait to harm conservative/Christian/Constitution-loving Americans.

They are a cabal of ruthless predators w/ no empathy for others.

==========================================

REFERENCE FR POSTED America is now run by angry, feral adolescents fueled by hatred, jealousy and revenge
Coach Is Right ^ | December 21st, 2012 | Derek Hollenbeck

POSTER'S COMMENTS It’s not uncommon for some in the minority community to believe that the white establishment (Republicans) uses its power to slander and destroy those who threaten the "status quo"......

Snide remarks about the “invisible and permanent powers-that-be” (Republicans) trying to take down minorities...... is a sentiment some minorities bandy about when they try to justify (what they deem) is their loser status.

================================================

THIS KIND OF PERVERSE CORRUPT THINKING IS REMINSCENT OF THE POST-CIVIL WAR ERA----Carpetbaggers---Northern invaders into the South ----were prominent in politics until 1875, but nearly all left under pressure from the Red Shirts and White Liners -----white paramilitary organizations, then-described as "the military arm of the Democratic Party", working openly to violently overthrow Republican rule, using intimidation and assassination to turn Republicans out of office and suppress freedmen's (former slaves) voting.

The Republican sheriff of Yazoo, Mississippi, received a brief flurry of national attention when insurgent white Democrats took over the county government and forced him to flee. (WIKI)

================================================

FREEPER ACTION MEMO In 1875, Hiram Revels, a Mississippi Republican--and the first African-American US Senator-- wrote to then-Pres Ulysses S. Grant denouncing Northern invaders into the post-Civil War south for manipulating the Black vote for personal benefit, and for keeping alive wartime hatreds. (WIKI)

We need to get someone with integrity----like Cong Allen West (not reelected)----- to write letters to his colleagues, and to the media.

Cong West needs to do the following:

(1) decry the agitation and intimidation tactics being used by these groups,

(2) expose using hatemongering for personal gain,

(3) emphasize the illegalities WRT threatening members of the US Congress,

(4) precpitate investigations into fraud and intimidation upon our electoral/legislative system by these hate-mongering groups, and,

(5) determine the scope and dimension of subversion these activities are visiting on US ntl security.

46 posted on 12/29/2012 3:20:21 PM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
The face that just begs to be slapped!


47 posted on 12/29/2012 3:38:28 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Jab her with a harpoon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears Bears (repeating)

Should David Gregory be treated more leniently than a domestic cat just because when Obama tickles his tummy he licks the president’s hand and purrs contentedly?

48 posted on 12/29/2012 4:16:14 PM PST by NonValueAdded (If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you've likely misread the situation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; All

In any future gun, law, Conservatives should insist on a “Gregory Exemption”... prosecutors have to demand that prove intention of an evil act beyond possession.

Seems simple enough...


49 posted on 12/29/2012 4:44:55 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

The Only thing cooler than a Mark Steyn Article is Mark Steyn reading it and posting a MP3 of it on his site...


50 posted on 12/29/2012 5:09:29 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson