Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graham: Vote yes but fight on debt ceiling
Washington Post ^ | January 1, 2013 | Rachel Weiner

Posted on 01/01/2013 11:56:28 AM PST by Uncle Chip

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) urged House Republicans to accept a “fiscal cliff” deal passed by the Senate early Tuesday morning — and to prepare to extract concessions from Democrats in exchange for raising the debt ceiling.

If the House fails to pass the deal, Graham told Fox News, “We’re going to get blamed and about two weeks into this, we’ll fold like a cheap suit.” Instead, he urged Republicans, “Work with me and others never to raise the debt ceiling again unless we address why we’re in so much debt.” Graham made a similar comment to the National Review, saying, “It’s not all I would have liked, but it’s called American democracy, so on to the debt ceiling.”

And on Twitter, he wrote, ”The debt ceiling fight is where we can make major spending changes and prevent the country from becoming Greece.”

Graham is up for reelection in 2014, and he could face a tough primary challenge from the right. He’s clearly seeking to make the case to conservatives that Tuesday morning’s vote doesn’t mean caving on spending.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: lindsaygraham; lindseydoilsalesman; lindseygraham; southcarolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Uncle Chip
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. … Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that 'the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better." --From Sen. Obama's Floor Speech, March 20, 2006
21 posted on 01/01/2013 12:17:17 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
We are working on it...

the House TEA Party caucus should attach just one amendment to the senate bill—tax cuts for everybody!

It will die when it goes back to the senate but at least everyone will know WHO raised everyones taxes.

22 posted on 01/01/2013 12:20:33 PM PST by Happy Rain ("Outlawing guns because of Adam Lanza would be like outlawing free speech because of Bill Maher.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; alarm rider; Alex1977; at bay; Babsig; BILL_C; bnelson44; ColdOne; DesScorp; G.Love; ...
Would you people in SC please get rid of this guy.

Primaried next year. Assuming we can find a conservative candidate that will seriously challenge Linda. She's got a substantial war chest. No, not that kind of chest :)

Uber RINO Lindsey Ping
"Republican by day, Democrat by night."


Want on or off this ping list?
Just FReepmail me.

h/t to martin_fierro for the graphic

Frigging faggot!

23 posted on 01/01/2013 12:21:01 PM PST by upchuck (America's at an awkward stage. Too late to work within the system, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods; All

Monday around 3 pm it was fascinating to see McCain and Graham pulling a Bad Cop/Good Cop routine over the Senate vote and Obama’s 2 pm press event.

Regarding our young people being hardest hit, in 1983 during the Reagan administration there was a bipartisan effort to save Social Security. It was agreed that a wage cap of 90% was a suitable figure to use. Since then the wage cap has drifted down to hovering around 85%. If it had been kept at 90%, and if it is moved back there quickly, then SS would have a lot more fully funded years to help our younger population when the time comes.


24 posted on 01/01/2013 12:21:17 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

It’s time to thwart Obama’s “leadership.” Vote NO and then hold tough on the debt ceiling.


25 posted on 01/01/2013 12:22:27 PM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
I honest to God thought this was satire. Give in now and we will fight when the debt ceiling comes up. We don't want to be blamed for the fiscal cliff.

Give in now so we don't get blamed for shutting down the government. We have to raise the debt ceiling or we will get blamed.

Ass hats should just fight to the death every time. At least then they would be respected. Nothing but political whores!

26 posted on 01/01/2013 12:22:55 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
The surrender monkey who folded like a cheap suit dares to lecture others.

Yeah, Miss Lindsey and the rest of them didn't have the stones to fight this insanity off in the Senate so now, after punting the mess back to the House, he wants the House to do something manly. Wow.

27 posted on 01/01/2013 12:23:16 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
Graham: Vote yes but fight on debt ceiling

Nah, vote no, and primary Grahamnesty anyway.

28 posted on 01/01/2013 12:28:07 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I guess Graham failed to mention the Senate bill had an additional
330 Billion in additional spending. And he voted for that?
Primary his a$$ out.


29 posted on 01/01/2013 12:29:41 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

It is better to hold ones lip and say noting when all that I could say is beyond Negative!


30 posted on 01/01/2013 12:31:45 PM PST by jafojeffsurf (Return to the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Exactly. Thanks for link.
The Goober has a mental disorder.


31 posted on 01/01/2013 12:32:15 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I want to vote too. I vote we make any remaining GOP supporters identify themselves on forums so we can just ignore anything they have to say preemptively.

If they insist on empowering a party hellbent on wrecking the last vestiges of my country, I want to know who I’m dealing with upfront.


32 posted on 01/01/2013 12:34:15 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jafojeffsurf

This should have never got this far. All this needed was for Boneher to say “the house passed legislation already and sent it to the senate. The Senate didn’t even consider it. That’s it, we’re done. We’re not voting on anything else. We already agreed dems and repubs to the sequestration. That’s it. We’re done with this topic. Have a nice day.” And then recess the house until about February.


33 posted on 01/01/2013 12:35:28 PM PST by kjam22 (my newest music video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7gNI9bWO3s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

The GOP gave in a year ago, which is why we are where we are now.
These people are not just hacks, but mentally I’ll hacks.
Goober talks about cutting spending a day after he voted for a bill that
contains 330 billion more in spending. The lady is very sick.


34 posted on 01/01/2013 12:36:36 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

No, they are DEMOCRATS, and I wonder just how much reality people can ignore before the embarrassment of it becomes too much to bear.


35 posted on 01/01/2013 12:38:00 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Two Words: Limp Dick!


36 posted on 01/01/2013 12:39:46 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

He doesn’t want the Libs exposing the rampant homosexuality in the Republican party. So he give in to protect those not yet ‘proud’ enough to admit it..


37 posted on 01/01/2013 12:42:41 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Open letter to South Carolina Republicans:

Please run someone against this little ba$$turd and send him out of the Senate. Please. Thank you.

Don’t worry. He will not come “home”. He will become a sleazy DC lobbyist.

Shalom


38 posted on 01/01/2013 12:44:20 PM PST by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

What more could you expect from the “princess?”


39 posted on 01/01/2013 12:47:02 PM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

Exactly —


40 posted on 01/01/2013 12:48:49 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson