Obama not communist enough for lefties in the fiscal cliff negotiations...
This is the second "hard news" article in the NYT in two days reporting on progressives attacking Obama for giving away too much. Not unlike after the 1st debate disaster, when Barry the sock puppet screws up on delivering the agenda he is savagely beaten.
Time to move on from this. This is long past old.
posted on 01/01/2013 9:47:17 PM PST
(Dems go for results, meaning winning. Rs go for symbolism and whining about losing.)
Obama is not liberal enough?
posted on 01/01/2013 9:53:24 PM PST
(The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
oh brother...this is all a coordinated effort between the White House and these leftist groups to try and make Obama look more centrist/reasonable. All of these liberal groups know darn well that Obama is trying to move to country further to the left as fast as possible.
So the NYT doesn’t think their totalitarian fruitcake is fruity enough? Boo-hoo.
Yup. Debate over sequestration kicked down the road only two months, coinciding with need to raise debt ceiling again. Dems think Obama gave up most of his leverage with this deal, leaving the Republicans with the advantage in that fight. Many think he should have held out for an agreement that covered those points as well, along with holding firm on the $250k level for tax increases.
posted on 01/01/2013 9:58:24 PM PST
by MN Doc
what exactly did he give away?
cuz the GOP completely surrendered
posted on 01/01/2013 10:22:49 PM PST
Tea Party of the left, my ass. It’s the commie party of the left.
posted on 01/01/2013 10:26:46 PM PST
(the 0bama regime are the people Huxley, Orwell and Rand warned us about)
The people that work for the slimes do not deserve to live in this once great but now dying republic.
posted on 01/02/2013 4:33:33 AM PST
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson