Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana hospital fires 8 workers who refused flu shot
Fox News ^ | January 01, 2013

Posted on 01/02/2013 10:00:43 AM PST by Sopater

GOSHEN, Ind. – A northern Indiana hospital has fired eight employees who refused to get flu shots under a new policy intended to protect patients from the potentially deadly illness. IU Health Goshen Hospital officials told its staff in September that flu shots would no longer be optional for staff, affiliated physicians, volunteers and vendors. Hospital spokeswoman Melanie McDonald told The Elkhart Truth for a Monday story that the new requirements came as a recommendation from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Medical Association and other major health agencies. McDonald said patients with compromised immune systems are at a heightened risk for illness and death from the flu and protecting them is the hospital's "top priority."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: flushots; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Sopater

Most everyone here will base their acceptance of this hospital’s decision on their opinion of flu shots not on the rights of the parties.

Most people cannot accept that private parties have the right to dictate the terms of employment irregardless of most “rights” the employee has. Many here would say it is wrong for the hospital to disallow employees from bringing weapons into the hospital.


21 posted on 01/02/2013 12:58:13 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

What if your work required you get a tattoo or be fired?

What if your work required you take an experimental vaccine?

What if your work required you to take a vaccine derived from aborted fetal cells?

What if your work required you to take a vaccine with known dangerous compounds in it?

What if your work required you to take a vaccine that had a high rate of dangerous side effects?

What if your work required you to have an rfid microchip implanted in your hand to operate their new security system?


22 posted on 01/02/2013 2:31:24 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

In any of those cases, you should be free to accept the terms of employment and keep your job or refuse them and lose it.


23 posted on 01/02/2013 3:35:34 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

so you won’t mind when your employer creates a policy arbitrarily that it knows you won’t accept, and thus gets rid of you without having to actually fire you for a legitimate reason?

insubordination of failing to follow idiotic policies in order to make it appear they/are justified in firing you is ridiculous and there’s probably a lawsuit in it.


24 posted on 01/02/2013 4:33:13 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I wouldn’t work there!

My son’s private Christian schools has lots of requirements made of it’s employees. They can’t wear certain clothes. The cannot be living with someone out of wedlock. They can’t be pregnant out of wedlock. They have lots of rules about social media, but I don’t know all of those.


25 posted on 01/02/2013 5:35:33 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

and if your employer is personally gunning for you and gets rid of you by establishing stupid rules they know you won’t accept, you are totally okay with that?


26 posted on 01/02/2013 6:11:52 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

what if they say you have to remain single to work there? what if they say you can’t have kids and work there?

it seems like you don’t have problems with rules where employers force you to do things with your body. i asume you wouldn’t have problems with the company saying “no kids”.

apparently there’s not much a company could do that crosses any legal lines for you.

there are real, documented health issues with vaccines and also the actual benefit of vaccines are questionable. they just did a study that looked at 20+ flu studies over the last 50 years to see benefits of getting a flu shot, they found from all that data if you got a shot, you were only 4% less likely to get the flu than if you didn’t get the shot at all. that’s it. hardly worth mandating it.

this is just propping up a crappy big pharma product. this is vaccine subsidies is what it is.


27 posted on 01/02/2013 6:22:34 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

American courts have long recognized that the 1st Amendment prohibits the government from dictating terms of employment to ministerial employees of churches. Even people you don’t like have freedom of religion.


28 posted on 01/03/2013 6:19:46 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Umm, in case my post # 28 made no sense, it’s because I posted it on the wrong thread.


29 posted on 01/03/2013 6:21:37 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
This was the same system that told us if they found out an employee was smoking on their own time away from the hospital they would get fired. I am not a smoker but don’t tell me what I can’t do when I am not at work....

Were they self-insured for employee health costs?

30 posted on 01/03/2013 6:28:23 AM PST by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown are by desperate appliance relieved, or not at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

IF you want, you can always tell an admin mod to delete that post because it was posted to the wrong thread. They’ll do it for mistakes.


31 posted on 01/03/2013 9:47:28 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

To work at Starbucks, you have to drink coffee. Epileptics can’t drink coffee. I don’t think an epileptic should work there.


32 posted on 01/03/2013 1:11:12 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

To work at Starbucks, you have to drink coffee. Epileptics can’t drink coffee. I don’t think an epileptic should work there.


33 posted on 01/03/2013 1:11:14 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson