Protection for ME, but not thee.
F U B O !
Republicans need to say this is DOA and let obama scream.
How about we put a ban on murdering negroes and mexicans instead? That would definitely be more effective at reducing murder and crime in general.
I wonder if there have been any protests over the guns at Sidwell Friends school. (Cindy Sheehan, perhaps?)
And I wonder what would happen to any protestors.
The last few seconds are priceless!
So Obama doesn’t like armed guards in schools but has NO problem with his own kids being protected by 11 armed guards..without hypocrisy liberals wouldn’t have anything left..hypocrisy is all they know
He can go F his big eared self. Assault rifles (as they are called) are my ultimate protection against being murdered by my government. If they try it, they likely can do it, but it will come with a nasty price.
When someone can guarantee it would never happen here, we can talk. But remember, in 1913, Germany was a civilized nation. Education was probably the best in Europe. It had more citizens who could vote _by far_than either France or England. Jews were respected citizens fully sprinked throughout society. It was the home quite literally of poets and philosophers. Protestants, Catholics, and Jews all had thriving churches.
If someone then had informed them that in three decades, they would murder 6 million Jews in death factories, and would work hard to locate and murder every Jew in France, Holland, Poland, Ukraine, etc, they would have been thought of as some kind of crank or nut.
Nobody can promise me that a holocaust is not in Americas future. Even today, the papers had one article that the constitution should be abandoned, and another NRA members should be executed and that the GOP leaders of the House and Senate should be murdered like James Byrd in Texas, dragged behind a pickup.
Substitute “Jews”, “Tutsis”, “Amenians”, “Kulaks” for “NRA members” and the old nasty theme becomes clear.
It’s a special irony that at the moment Obama becomes more and more totalitarian, (ergo,,an existential threat) he wants us to disarm.
I would love to hear nobama’s definition of an assault rifle.
Let me guess: “If it looks scary.” LOL!
Hell, any weapon can be used to assault someone. Even non-weapons like a pickaxe qualify.
Meanwhile, hundreds of Mexicans and two U.S. Border Patrol agents were killed because of Obama’s and Holder’s “Fast and Furious” gun running to Mexico.
And he wants to lecture the NRA? What unmitigated arrogance.
It is plain to see that they lack respect for constitutional law, their oath to support and defend it, the people and their rights, and consider themselves elevated to the standing of rulers over them. No amount of pleading, whether oral or written, will deter them from their course as they see themselves empowered by the votes which allowed them to occupy high office.
I have no respect for them or their unconstitutional edicts. That is as it should and will be until such time as they are removed from office and replaced by their betters. I have written representatives before citing law, common sense and logic. Agenda trumps all three and they are pursuing an agenda. What we are watching now is a badly produced sequel of a very old drama. I know how this ends and so do you. So I will just lurk here to see which way the winds are blowing, await the pop-flares and offer a comment or three.
Good luck to you all.
Coming soon: Taxpayer subsidized snitch cash incentives with every free Obamaphone. The snitch line will be pre-programmed for one touch dialing.
...so the President who gave “assault weapons” to Mexican drug gangs now wants to deny them to US citizens?
I think a ban on drug abusing, foreign, anti-American, Marxist homosexuals as president would serve America better.
Ah- my son’s public school is guarded by two armed police officers- and our local government passed a law that teachers and parents are allowed to have guns in a lock box, on school grounds.
Obama can sit and spin.
F U B O !
Anne Frank’s family was in an Apartment. The entrance was extremely small. A person had to stoop to enter. The small squad of one Nazi cop and a few Dutch cops, could have been wiped out with one carefully thought out ambush using one 30 round mag.
With a single AR or AK, it would have been completely possible to have killed them all. Even a Remington 870 could have done fine. The family could have left and vanished out a backdoor. Very possible they could have got away.
And if they didn’t, such goings on would have meant that the Nazi police force in Amsterdam would have had to do such investigations much more tactically, with more officers, and with better weapons. This would have taxed the murder machine further. Any participant in such a murder enterprise that is targeted slows the bureacracy, the more, and the more scattered through the machinery, the better.
Anne’s family needed an AK.
We are living in a time in which emotions are elevated above reason. Making rational arguments are a thing for past generations. This whole issue of gun control is based upon the emotions surrounding the killing of school children. The fact that all the gun laws in the world wouldn’t have prevented this slaughter is dismissed. You can’t reason with people that refuse to use reason.