Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elector Challenge Against Obama - Jan. 3, 2013, 2 p.m. PDT
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation | 1/2/2013 | Orly Taitz

Posted on 01/03/2013 8:04:31 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

This order was issued at 5:17pm [1/2/2013] by Judge England, confirming that each side gets 20 minutes at tomorrow’s [1/3/2013] hearing per local rules


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: birthers; electoral; eligibility; lawsuit; naturalborncitizen; taitz; truthers; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Cannot link to Taitz website per FR rules.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=373421

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Grinols-complaint.pdf

This may be out last best hope to stop the monster named Obama. It is a TRO hearing. If judge England gives it a fair treatment (that's a BIG IF), and rules for Taitz, et. al., then this will become worldwide news.

The case has merit and standing because it is being brought by a certified Republican elector who is being disenfranchized because of Obama's fraud.

Whatever you may think of Dr. Orly Taitz, do not spit on her with your comments. She is actually DOING SOMETHING to stop Obama and protect your freedoms.

I suggest that we pray for her success.

1 posted on 01/03/2013 8:04:35 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

The Arizona electors are also considering a protest to his election. Don’t hold your breath...but any port in a storm.


2 posted on 01/03/2013 8:10:31 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
3 posted on 01/03/2013 8:12:41 AM PST by oldbrowser (They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

Can she subpoena the “birth certificate” as evidence of fraud?


4 posted on 01/03/2013 8:14:44 AM PST by eCSMaster (2012 elections: American Coup d'etat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

“Cannot link to Taitz website per FR rules. “

Is this something new?

Because I can’t find the site anywhere on the updated list.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts


5 posted on 01/03/2013 8:15:53 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

WHAT birth certificate?


6 posted on 01/03/2013 8:18:43 AM PST by MestaMachine (It's the !!!!TREASON!!!!, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

Too many complaints about the massive and nasty malware people have gotten when going to her site, I think. At one time, it was the worst I’d seen, so I thought maybe the place had been hacked. But it wasn’t, it’s just another facet to Taits. So I just stay away from all things Orly Tait just to be safe.


7 posted on 01/03/2013 8:27:53 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Interesting.

I’ve never gotten any warnings about malware or ‘attack site’ anytime that I’ve gone to that site.

Might just be ‘false positives’ from whatever antimalware or antivirus program that is being used.

But, like I said, I didn’t see it listed under the ‘excerpted’ or ‘link only’ copyright list.

Thanks for the info though.


8 posted on 01/03/2013 8:34:10 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

AFAIK, the Electors could vote for Daffy Duck if they chose to - that would not violate Federal law.

They may face state charges, but who they vote for is a done deal, state charges or not.


9 posted on 01/03/2013 8:39:05 AM PST by djf (Conservative values help the poor. Liberal values help them STAY poor!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

I went to her site a couple times and never got ANYTHING like you describe, I also run Linux.


10 posted on 01/03/2013 8:41:45 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

Sometimes I wonder whose side Taitz is on..


11 posted on 01/03/2013 8:45:23 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

I’m definitely praying for her success.

AZ SOS Ken Bennett sent in a request form asking HI to verify Obama’s birth facts, as well as some other things. The verification he received did not verify ANY birth facts that were submitted in the request application: male, Aug 4, 1961, Honolulu, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Barack Hussein Obama, even though HRS 338-14.3 requires the registrar to verify any submitted facts if it CAN be verified (certified as being the way the event actually happened).

Onaka would not verify that the White House long-form image was a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” but did verify that the information contained in the White House image “matches” the record on file. In a later verification to KS SOS Kris Kobach Onaka would not verify that the information in the White House image is “identical to” the information in the record on file.

Because the claims on the White House image are all on the original record, all of the above-listed items lawfully have to be verified in the verification to Ken Bennett IF THE RECORD THEY HAVE IS LEGALLY VALID. Because he did not include those items, we know that the record is not legally valid.

IOW, there is a certified document from Hawaii indirectly confirming that Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is legally non-valid and that he has no legally-established birth facts.

There is no way he has ever been able to qualify to be President. That’s according to a certified document from the official in Hawaii responsible to tell the truth about the record.


12 posted on 01/03/2013 8:45:40 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

An official order from Congress to Hawaii, demanding that 0bama’s ORIGINAL BIRTH RECORDS be submitted or made available for Congress to review would put this baby to bed once and for all, so to speak.


13 posted on 01/03/2013 8:58:33 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

My first attempt to link to the website was stopped with a complaint about malware.


14 posted on 01/03/2013 8:59:07 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

This isn’t “doing something”, this is an 11th-hour tinfoil gasp of hot air.

The time to “do something” was last year, when we failed to nominate an actual conservative to be Obama’s opponent.


15 posted on 01/03/2013 8:59:25 AM PST by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

Right now this is just a TRO. If it goes to trial, then yes, she can supoena the birth certificate.

BTW, she is purposely going for a jury trial so that the Obama administration cannot put the screws to a single judge to get him to vote in favor of Obama.


16 posted on 01/03/2013 9:05:34 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed
Advisory opinion by Florida Sec of State on ballot access for naturalized U.S. Citizen candidate for Office of the President of the U.S.

http://www.abdulhassanforpresident.com/ballot_access/Florida_Ballot_Access_Ruling_Hassan_for_President.pdf

The Florida Supreme Court ruled, "The law does not give the secretary of state any power or authority to inquire into or pass upon the eligibility of a candidate to hold office for the nomination for which he is running." Davis ex rel, Taylor v. Crawford, 116 So. 41, 42 (Fla. 1928).

If an ineligible candidate for the Office of the President of the U.S. (or the party in the case of a political party nominee) files the required papers under Chapter 103, Florida Statutes, the Secretary must grant ballot access to the ineligible candidate. The Secretary's ministerial granting of ballot access "would not preclude litigation from proper plaintiffs to remove a candidate's name from the ballot if the candidate does not satisfy the qualifications for the office of the President of the United States."

17 posted on 01/03/2013 9:08:22 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mquinn

I agree that we should have fielded a conservative.

However, since we have a system that elects the president through an Electoral College, it seems to be the only avenue for a challenger to have “standing.” Everything other suit has been dismissed for lack of “standing.”

This is the proper avenue for exposing the fraud and stopping the monster.


18 posted on 01/03/2013 9:11:04 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

“This is the proper avenue for exposing the fraud and stopping the monster.”

It’s still going to tick off a lot of “conservative” posters here.


19 posted on 01/03/2013 9:20:55 AM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

1) No judge in the US is willing to overturn a nation-wide election or reconfirming election. That single person (or group) will be saddled with having created a Constitutional crisis (and probable urban unrest/looting, reference Rodney King).

2) The SCOTUS has already shown us that nationwide elections alter the immediate understanding of the Constitution; meaning elections trump the US Constitution.


20 posted on 01/03/2013 9:32:54 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson