Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Orszag: Yeah, the White House has less leverage in the spending fight now
Hotair ^ | 01/03/2013 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 01/03/2013 12:19:28 PM PST by SeekAndFind

As I wrote earlier this week, the fiscal-cliff deal was mostly a win for Barack Obama, but only a temporary victory fought on one issue. By delinking the tax debate from the spending debate and keeping the debt limit out of the fiscal-cliff deal, Republicans at least allowed themselves the chance to fight another day for spending cuts and entitlement reform. Whether they can successfully negotiate real reform is another question, of course, but even Obama's former OMB director acknowledges that the White House now has significantly less leverage to prevent budget reform now that taxes are off the table. Peter Orszag tells CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin that Obama may have won the week but lost the quarter by agreeing to that split (via the RNC):

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

SORKIN: But you know the president. The president said that he will not negotiate for example on the debt ceiling. This is a nonstarter. Is that a nonstarter or is that the beginning of a negotiation?

ORSZAG: Well I don’t know that that statement actually frankly matters that much. Because they’re going to have to negotiate over replacing the – you know the sequester was only delayed by two months. So you’re going to have to negotiate over that. You’re going to have to negotiate over the appropriations bill for the funding the daily operations of the government. So if you’re negotiating over those things, and the debt limit’s kind of thrown in, you can say you’re not negotiating over the debt limit but there will be negotiations in February and March.

SORKIN: Who’s got the leverage in all this? I mean when you look back at what just happened over the past three days do you say the Democrats won? Do you say the Republicans won?

ORSZAG: I think — my own perspective at least is I think the White House in this second best world won that round, but they, by not insisting that the debt limit be tied that to the package, it’s entirely possible they’re going to win the week and lose the quarter. And we’ll see, you can’t – you don’t know yet until you see how February and March plays out, and I think there’s no doubt that they have somewhat less leverage than they did in the round just completed.

This is why liberals were not entirely happy with the outcome of the fiscal cliff deal, either. While Democrats had the political advantage on the “fairness” issue on taxes, Republicans almost certainly have an advantage when it comes to federal spending, at least in principle. And now that the Republicans gave way on taxes, there will be more political pressure for Democrats to demonstrate moderation by agreeing to some meaningful reforms on spending. That doesn’t mean that Harry Reid will accommodate that in the Senate, but it gives Republicans an advantage if and when it comes down to a government shutdown over the debt limit and spending approvals — especially since Reid and his Democratic majority in the Senate hasn’t passed a normal budget in almost four years.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obama; orzag; spending; whitehouse

1 posted on 01/03/2013 12:19:43 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“It’s entirely possible they’re going to win the week and lose the quarter.”
2 posted on 01/03/2013 12:21:04 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I doubt it. I think the WH will leverage spending cuts with amnesty for illegals. I think that is obvious, and the GOP will agree to do that.


3 posted on 01/03/2013 12:22:02 PM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Say Obama somehow took a hit in all this is like saying a big guy beating the crap out of you can’t hit you as hard anymore because his fists are hurting.


4 posted on 01/03/2013 12:29:24 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Same as last time. They caved twice last time, and they’ll do the same thing now.


5 posted on 01/03/2013 12:40:18 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Both SPENDING parties are stuck on stupid. Starve the beast and make their lives as miserable as possible. F them before they F you.


6 posted on 01/03/2013 12:55:47 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
For months...even years...Boehner has been in the hot seat while trying to cobble together legislation and conservatives were also piling on.

So how exactly did Reid escape examination all this time when he hasn't been doing a thing?

7 posted on 01/03/2013 1:11:43 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
We may not be winning the battles, but each time we go through one Obama gets weaker.

Democrats, for example, were always against the Bush tax cuts. Well, they just passed them permanently for a majority of the public (only one tax rate exempt).

And Obama is increasingly unable to escape the spending issue. We came that close to him going for some SS reform in the last fight. The onus is swinging more and more toward him (and the Democrat sacred cows) each time.

8 posted on 01/03/2013 1:18:04 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

hey its the bald dude with all the wives and girlfriends.


9 posted on 01/03/2013 1:22:23 PM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
All the House Republicans need to do is let the expense reduction side of sequestration go over the cliff in March and they have a win. The scored result will be $3 trillion of cuts versus $600 billion of additional revenue, a 5:1 ratio of cuts to revenue. Emergency funds for defense can be voted from time to time.

Boehner is good at doing nothing. That is all that's necessary.

10 posted on 01/03/2013 1:24:25 PM PST by Kennard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson