Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Cheer for the Cliff Deal
Townhall.com ^ | January 4, 2013 | Larry Kudlow

Posted on 01/04/2013 7:27:00 AM PST by Kaslin

One cheer out of a potential three is all anyone can logically give the fiscal-cliff deal. On the day after the bargain was clinched, the stock market gave a 300-point cheer. So be it.

In the short run, extending tax cuts up to $450,000 probably saved us from a recession. If all the tax cuts had expired, we’d have a $500 billion tax hike, plus marginal rate increases, and that would have sunk the economy. So I’m going to bet that the big stock rally was a sign of relief that the final deal wasn’t worse.

The final product was sort of a least-bad tax scenario. The top tax threshold got to $450,000. Capital gains and dividends were capped at 20 percent. And even the estate tax did better than feared, with a 40 percent rate off a $5 million exemption. Plus, all the tax rates were made permanent -- including the rate for the alternative minimum tax (AMT).

So it could have been worse. And it probably saved a recession. So that’s the one cheer. But the rest of this story goes from bad to worse.

Let’s start with no spending cuts. The spending sequester was thrown out the window. And I have zero confidence that much if any of it will be restored in the next couple of months. The well-publicized ratio of 41-to-1 -- tax hikes over spending cuts -- is deplorable.

We’ll see during the upcoming debt-ceiling battle whether Congress, including the Republicans, has a real appetite to cut spending. There will be talk about shutting down the government, and even worse talk of a debt default. But right now it’s hard to expect any consensus on real entitlement reform and spending restraint that would limit the federal share of the economy to 20 percent, which is where it belongs.

And that brings me back to the tax problem. The president is going to want another $600 billion or $700 billion in tax hikes. The recent bill already curbs high-end exemptions and deductions. But get ready -- more is on the way from Team Obama. More deduction caps. Maybe a value-added tax. Maybe a carbon tax. Or maybe they just keep taxing the rich.

And don’t forget the Obamacare tax hikes, which are estimated to be roughly $1 trillion over the next ten years. That includes a 3.8 percent surtax on investment income above $250,000 per family, a 0.9 percent hike in the Medicare payroll tax (also a $250,000 threshold), a 2.3 percent medical-device tax, new caps on flexible health accounts, and an Obamacare haircut for medical itemized deductions.

In rough terms, when you add the Obamacare tax hikes on successful investors, earners, and small-business owners to the new fiscal-cliff bill, you’re looking at a roughly 12 percent decline of incentive rewards from lower profitability and less take-home pay.

Of course this is anti-growth. Of course this will reduce the long-term growth potential of the U.S. economy. And of course the added revenues will be spent, bloating the budget and reducing the economy’s potential to grow.

It’s a European economic model. And it’s the exact reverse of supply-side economics. You can’t tax your way into prosperity or a balanced budget. The economic pie grows smaller. Government grows bigger. Redistribution and government dependency grow more powerful and pervasive.

And make no mistake about this: Economic growth is the key to reducing the spending, deficit, and debt share of the economy. Specifically, grow the GDP denominator with real personal and corporate tax-rate reform and reduce the demand for government dependency. That’s the solution to our problem. A 20 percent spending rule would cure the problem even faster.

Unfortunately, we’re going in the wrong direction right now.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/04/2013 7:27:05 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The only way out of our financial problems is greater growth.

Greater taxes and greater regulation will not accomplish that goal.


2 posted on 01/04/2013 7:57:10 AM PST by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
The only piece of the bill that made any sense to me is that the AMT was permanently indexed to inflation. Having pols extend it every year was a ridiculous sham.

My guess, that's where a lot of the "lost tax revenue" is that they're talking about. But I don't know that for a fact.

The rest? Foolishness. At very best, it kicked the can down the road for a few weeks.

3 posted on 01/04/2013 8:36:34 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Personally, I was surprised at the ground Obama gave in the estate tax. He had been pushing for far more.

Also, he gave on the dividend taxes. I haven't read the details but at the end he did not get what he wanted there.

Contrary to what people said about Obama wanting to go off the cliff, it seems to me he was pretty anxious to get a deal in the last 24 hours. And from what I hear McConnell had to go to Biden to get a deal because Reid wasn't doing a thing.

The dust is just starting to settle on this thing. It will be interesting to see politically where we are in a couple of weeks.

4 posted on 01/04/2013 12:01:21 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson