Skip to comments.
Thunderbird 2 flies again: The astonishing airship set to revolutionise haulage, tourism...
Daily Mail ^
| 1/4/13
| Damien Gayle
Posted on 01/04/2013 12:38:01 PM PST by Nachum
A radical new kind of airship funded by the US military is about to make its first test flight - and it looks uncannily like the Thunderbird 2 craft from the classic TV show.
The Aeroscraft airship will carry three times as much as the biggest military cargo planes over thousands of miles, use a third of the fuel, and it doesn't even need a landing strip.
It could also have major implications for cargo haulage, and almost everything now laboriously transported across the planet's surface by boat, train and lorry could within years be carried through the skies, its makers claim.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airship; haulage; tourism; warfare
Full title: Thunderbird 2 flies again: The astonishing airship set to revolutionise haulage, tourism... and warfare
It's..um... a blimp
1
posted on
01/04/2013 12:38:10 PM PST
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
2
posted on
01/04/2013 12:43:31 PM PST
by
frithguild
(You can call me Snippy the Anti-Freeper)
To: Nachum
Not a blimp. Blimps have no rigid air frame. This has a rigid air frame and it is therefor a lighter than air ship.
3
posted on
01/04/2013 12:44:21 PM PST
by
Candor7
(Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
To: Nachum
4
posted on
01/04/2013 12:46:47 PM PST
by
mike_9958
To: Nachum
I've seen this from a distance twice - once for a few moments before they rushed to close the doors because there was a very light breeze and it was pushing the blimp across the hanger floor, the second time with it trying to lift off, a slight breeze coming by and it nosing into the ground.
I'm sure this is just the growing pains of a prototype, but this was funded as a long shot program, and so far it's lived up to those expectations. I wish them the best of luck, but if someone’s looking to start placing orders, they might want to hold off. I love the design ideas, seems quite possible to work, just not sure how they'll handle the energy requirements in flight for their fancy ballast system.
5
posted on
01/04/2013 12:47:16 PM PST
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: frithguild
Fly that over bezerkley and Alien reports will be pouring in.
LLS
6
posted on
01/04/2013 12:47:39 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: Candor7
7
posted on
01/04/2013 12:47:54 PM PST
by
Delta Dawn
(The whole truth.)
To: frithguild
Overgrown as it may be, I thought it was illegal to let such metallized mylar party balloons fly untethered in most urban areas...shorting out power lines etc.
8
posted on
01/04/2013 12:49:53 PM PST
by
repentant_pundit
(Sammy's your uncle, but he behaves like a spoiled rotten kid.)
To: Delta Dawn; Candor7
No reason to be confused. Candor7 is correct.
To: Candor7
10
posted on
01/04/2013 12:50:44 PM PST
by
real saxophonist
(I show my friends my 1911. I show my enemies my Glock.)
To: Candor7
I believe the word is “Dirigible”.
11
posted on
01/04/2013 12:50:44 PM PST
by
BubbaBasher
("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
To: Nachum
Well, that was uplifting.
12
posted on
01/04/2013 12:54:27 PM PST
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: Nachum
13
posted on
01/04/2013 12:56:23 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(Sine ullo desiderio vive et ama.... Carpe diem.)
To: frithguild
14
posted on
01/04/2013 12:58:30 PM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Looting the future to bribe the present)
To: Nachum
SUPERTHUNDERSTINGCAR!! ??
To: Dead Corpse
To: Candor7
You mean “dirigible.”
17
posted on
01/04/2013 1:02:55 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
Couple comments.
Would appear to have the capacity to haul a LOT of fuel, so why is range limited to 3000 miles?
For military applications, it looks an awful lot to me like a very large, very slow target.
I would expect the biggest difficulty to be taking off or landing in windy conditions, especially gusting winds.
To: Nachum
Tremendous advantage to not need a landing strip.
They conceive of it delivering to the front line of a battle. Not sure what would protect it from arty or missiles.
20
posted on
01/04/2013 1:07:28 PM PST
by
lurk
To: Nachum
Is it’s maiden voyage to Lakehurst, New Jersey?
21
posted on
01/04/2013 1:08:17 PM PST
by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ./base)
To: Sherman Logan
Don’t most radars need a hard surface to ping off of? That thing would be like trying to get a weapons lock on a cloud.
22
posted on
01/04/2013 1:17:37 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(Sine ullo desiderio vive et ama.... Carpe diem.)
To: Nachum
THUNDER-BIRDS ARE GO!!!!
FAB!
23
posted on
01/04/2013 1:18:41 PM PST
by
petro45acp
(More sheepdogs please...)
To: Nachum
Wasn’t some kid floating around inside that thing???
24
posted on
01/04/2013 1:20:52 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
(Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
To: kingu
Let the geniuses from Solyndra or one of those 0bummer craphole green energy co’s handle it; that’ll solve everything.
25
posted on
01/04/2013 1:23:30 PM PST
by
carriage_hill
("I meant to say maggot, but I have a lisp.")
To: mike_9958
“66 tons of cargo ?”
Yeah, 66 tons of smart bombs to drop on gun owners. :)
26
posted on
01/04/2013 1:24:05 PM PST
by
dljordan
(Voltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
To: frithguild
27
posted on
01/04/2013 1:26:20 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: frithguild
28
posted on
01/04/2013 1:26:28 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: Sherman Logan
exactly what I thought as well. nice concept but impactical in real life.
29
posted on
01/04/2013 1:31:21 PM PST
by
RitchieAprile
(the obstreperous gentleman..)
To: vikingd00d
Is its maiden voyage to Lakehurst, New Jersey?
To: Nachum
31
posted on
01/04/2013 1:34:29 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(The key to Marxism is medicine - V. Lenin)
To: Nachum
Lighter-than-air craft all have the same problem - directional controlling thrust.
If you took the computer controlled gyros of a Segway and mated them with enough directional thrust to counter wind, blow back, etc, then you would have smooth, reliable, lighter-than-air crafts.
32
posted on
01/04/2013 1:38:25 PM PST
by
Crusher138
("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
To: LibLieSlayer
Hell...fly it anywhere and the reports will stream in...
33
posted on
01/04/2013 1:38:30 PM PST
by
pgkdan
( "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson)
To: pgkdan
That is what I was thinking Dan. :-)
LLS
34
posted on
01/04/2013 1:49:55 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: Slyfox
35
posted on
01/04/2013 1:51:56 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Nachum
Just for a kick, they should fly the big sucker over
Devils Tower, Wyoming.....................Without informing the public :)
36
posted on
01/04/2013 1:54:56 PM PST
by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
To: ArrogantBustard
Does that mean that people will be allowed to smoke?
37
posted on
01/04/2013 2:06:39 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(The key to Marxism is medicine - V. Lenin)
To: Slyfox
Probably not.
Not because of a fire hazard.
Because smoking is evil.
Smoking is more evil than child molesting, raping goats, or clubbing baby seals.
So ... even though a separate smoking section would be perfectly feasible and completely safe ...
THERE WILL BE NO SMOKING!!!!
Ve vill haff ORDER!!!
38
posted on
01/04/2013 2:15:12 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Nachum
39
posted on
01/04/2013 2:33:53 PM PST
by
DManA
To: Nachum
cool.
Who has the contract to build the puppets to fly it?
40
posted on
01/04/2013 3:16:58 PM PST
by
Galt2010
To: mike_9958
66 tons of cargo ?That's about one Abrams tank with a few accessories, some fuel and a crew...
To: kingu
42
posted on
01/04/2013 3:19:08 PM PST
by
DTogo
(High time to bring back The Sons of Liberty !!)
To: Galt2010
43
posted on
01/04/2013 3:21:16 PM PST
by
Nachum
(The List is off the Google blacklist- www.nachumlist.com)
To: kingu
I’ve been reading stories about the imminent age of lighter than air cargo airships for 30 years.
44
posted on
01/04/2013 4:04:22 PM PST
by
DManA
( A)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
“In a disaster of unexpected dimensions, a pre-teen kid with a pellet gun shot a heavy-lift military blimp out of the sky, destroying a multimillion dollar craft and its millions in cargo.”
:’)
Thanks Nachum.
45
posted on
01/04/2013 7:56:14 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
To: DManA
Interesting link but sis you see this?
Balloons
Helium, like hydrogen, is lighter than air but unlike hydrogen it is inert, so there is little risk of an explosion.
What a bunch of idiots!
46
posted on
01/04/2013 8:19:19 PM PST
by
Eaker
(Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. Robert A. Heinlein.)
To: Eaker
I thought there was a shortage of helium.
To: Basement Dweller
I don’t know about a shortage but I do know there is zero risk of an explosion when working with helium.
48
posted on
01/11/2013 11:51:52 AM PST
by
Eaker
(Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. Robert A. Heinlein.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson