Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA’s illegal human experiments could break Nuremberg Code
Washington Times ^ | Dec. 31, 2012 | Steve Milloy

Posted on 01/04/2013 3:17:56 PM PST by prairiebreeze

The Obama Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says no law empowers any judge to stop it from conducting illegal scientific experiments on seniors, children and the sick.

That astounding assertion will be tested Friday, when a federal district court in Alexandria decides whether it has jurisdiction to hear claims made by the American Tradition Institute that EPA researchers are exposing unwary and genetically susceptible senior citizens to air pollutants the agency says can cause a variety of serious cardiac and respiratory problems, including sudden death.

Although the lawsuit only addresses ongoing, purportedly illegal experimentation being carried out at an EPA laboratory on the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, EPA researchers and grantees have carried out dozens of similarly shocking experiments over the past 10 years at UNC and other schools, including Rutgers University, the University of Michigan, University of Rochester, University of Southern California and University of Washington.

During that time at those university laboratories, EPA-employed or -funded researchers have intentionally exposed a variety of people to concentrated levels of different air pollutants, including particulate matter (soot and dust), diesel exhaust, ozone and chlorine gas — the latter substance more recognized as a World War I-era chemical weapon than as an outdoor air pollutant.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cleanairact; epa; humanexperiments; rogue; zerodarkthirty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: sarasmom

Perhaps this is the real reason Lisa Jackson tendered her resignation.
prairiebreeze,

Aha.. You ma be on to something!


41 posted on 01/04/2013 5:23:04 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

No ethics, and the EPA says no court can stop them.


42 posted on 01/04/2013 5:28:48 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

” “It’s perfectly safe to go watch that above-ground nuclear test.” -—> “It’s perfectly safe to work in the Navajo mine.” -—> “It’s perfectly safe to eat the food and drink the water....” “

And the constant radio blurbs to tell you to be sure to get the flu shot - there is absolutely nothing wrong with it and it will do wonders for you. UNQUOTE

(Just don’t mention the health care workers who would rather get fired from their jobs than get THAT shot)


43 posted on 01/04/2013 5:34:56 PM PST by PraiseTheLord (economic civil war ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

geez. when I lived up in Solvay, NY, if there was a chlorine leak the dang air-raid type horn went off and everybody shut the windows and tried not to breathe...


44 posted on 01/04/2013 5:47:37 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Thank you for posting that to this thread. I haven’t had a chance to read it all, will try to get at it this evening or over weekend.

Again, thank you.


45 posted on 01/04/2013 5:49:18 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PraiseTheLord

Oh, YES, thank you — I forgot that very important one! Come and get the latest gubt cocktail...


46 posted on 01/04/2013 5:51:46 PM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

I read this last week and was surprised that no one had posted it on FreeRepublic. I have a feeling that this could be the reason that Lisa Jackson resigned.

If this did happen under Bush, I would bet that he knew nothing about it. It sounds as though the subjects may have been in group homes or some other type of institution or government program. I just cannot imagine that people volunteered to be guinea pigs.


47 posted on 01/04/2013 5:55:12 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

“Aha.. You ma be on to something!”

Or may be something entirely different and even worse. Those
new emission regulations for diesel and coal are based
on these “experiments”.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2974584/posts


48 posted on 01/04/2013 6:11:53 PM PST by Slambat (The right to keep and bear arms. Anything one man can carry, drive or pull.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: visualops

Yes and Fulton smelled like chocolate on a rainy day.


49 posted on 01/04/2013 6:13:06 PM PST by lysie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GraceG; prairiebreeze

Recently I heard of this stuff - Neotame - and was horrified ! This has to be them doing bad things next step REALLY HORRID !

It is some artificial stuff, like aspartame-next, that they are putting in, it seems, EVERYTHING ! with NO LABEL REQUIRED to indicate it is an ingredient !

What could be worse than them putting *something bad* in ALL our food ?!

Cant find it on FR with a search, so here is some info:

http://worldtruth.tv/usda-certified-organics-dirty-little-secret-neotame/

-———and don’t buy processed foods whether they are labeled “Organic” or not. This requires a drastic change in lifestyle that most will not want to make. For those who choose to ride the wheel of chance by succumbing to this genocidal adulteration of our food supply by those who stand to profit from our sickness and early demise, my only comment is….it is your choice.

-———The food labeling requirements required for aspartame have now been dropped for Neotame, and no one is clear why this was allowed to happen. Neotame has been ruled acceptable, and without being included on the list of ingredients, for:

USDA Certified Organic food items.

Certified Kosher products with the official letter k inside the circle on labels.

—— Let me make this perfectly clear. Neotame does not have to be included in ANY list of ingredients! So, if you buy processed food, whether USDA Certified Organic or not, that food most likely will contain Neotame because it is cost-effective, and since no one knows it is there, there is no public backlash similar to what is happening with Aspartame. A win/win situation!

——But that’s not all. Just love chowing down on that delicious steak? Well, that cow most likely will have been fed with feed containing…..you guessed it…..Neotame!

A product called “Sweetos,” which is actually composed of Neotame, is being substituted for molasses in animal feed.
“Sweetos is an economical substitute for molasses. Sweetos guarantees the masking of unpleasant tastes and odor and improves the palatability of feed. This product will be economical for farmers and manufacturers of cattle feed. It can also be used in mineral mixture,” said Craig Petray, CEO, The NutraSweet Company, a division of Searle, which is a part of Monsanto.


50 posted on 01/04/2013 6:41:55 PM PST by PraiseTheLord (economic civil war ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PraiseTheLord

Soylent green for cattle?


51 posted on 01/04/2013 8:24:28 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks prairiebreeze.


52 posted on 01/04/2013 8:33:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

my pleasure


53 posted on 01/05/2013 6:41:19 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

sfl


54 posted on 01/05/2013 7:51:30 AM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.


55 posted on 01/05/2013 8:11:44 AM PST by twistedwrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson