Posted on 01/05/2013 11:02:38 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
9,680 more to go. More than 60% there.
If gun-free zones are good enough for our children, they should be good enough for our feral government overlords.
Why be unnecessarily confrontational in such a childish way?
Far from making the desired point, it can be used to cast us gun owners as irresponsible - - NOT WHAT WE WANT!
Please consider abandoning this publicity stunt, and focusing on responsible pro-Second Amendment projects.
The public needs to see gun owners as more adult and more responsible than the gun confiscators.
.
Go hide under your bed or something.
"We have to hold ourselves to a higher standard" is just Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals #5 in disguise: "Make your enemy live up to its own book of rules."
Because the country is now under the control of childish, low-information voters.
That's who the Left caters to, and it's why they win.
Only if the law is enforced equaly. ALL Guns. Because if guns are outlawed around Obama, then they dont need guns to defend him.
I would bet that the percentage of petition signers getting audited would be 4-5x higher than normal citizens.
Good article.
The difference is, NSA is storing information on EVERYBODY. Even the article you cited said that the danger is potential abuse for political purposes. But the WhiteHouse.gov information & petitions are PURELY for political use.
Exactly right. We just earned ourselves another four years of this socialist welfare crap because we played by our rules while they played by theirs.
So you're already frequenting a surveillance hot-spot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.