Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Officer Exposes The Unanswered Questions Of The Sandy Hook Tragedy
Alt-Market.com ^ | January 6, 2013 | Brandon Smith

Posted on 01/07/2013 9:22:51 PM PST by Errant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: S.O.S121.500

BOOKbump


101 posted on 01/08/2013 8:29:28 PM PST by S.O.S121.500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
I have no problem with inconsistencies but that is not what he is saying. He said you must believe a hundred near impossible events to make the official story believable. In other words according to him the official story is a deception or totally inaccurate and there is some alternate truth that only a few know about. Something tells me he thinks there were some controlled demolitions going on or something. That kinda stuff is just looney tunes.

That being said, I'm very skeptical about the reports from Sandy Hook. First, I have serious doubts about the murder weapon being a rifle. This runs counter to the first reports. It's also more likely the shooter would want to keep weapons concealed until he got into the building. Then there is the biggie. Where are the surveillance photos of the shooter? Brand new 50k security system for the school and not one picture of this guy?

Obviously I think the most likely explanation for the lack of video is that that the shooter did not use a rifle. I have my doubts as to whether there was even a rifle present at the scene. The medical examiners press conference seemed very rehearsed when it came to questions about the weapons used.

Anyway, unlike 9/11 we will NEVER get the straight story about this event. Our government is now completely corrupt and can't be trusted under any circumstances.

102 posted on 01/08/2013 9:11:54 PM PST by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Great article and interview.


103 posted on 01/08/2013 9:19:05 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

That is one of the odder things- who destroys evidence before they go on a killing spree?


104 posted on 01/08/2013 11:58:42 PM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

To protect the living, of course.. Was the media ordered to keep their mouths shut or what? And did the local authorities sure get quiet or what? I wonder if any foreign connections to this massacre. Very Russian-esque.


105 posted on 01/09/2013 12:08:23 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
That being said, I'm very skeptical about the reports from Sandy Hook. First, I have serious doubts about the murder weapon being a rifle. This runs counter to the first reports. It's also more likely the shooter would want to keep weapons concealed until he got into the building. Then there is the biggie. Where are the surveillance photos of the shooter? Brand new 50k security system for the school and not one picture of this guy?

Obviously I think the most likely explanation for the lack of video is that that the shooter did not use a rifle. I have my doubts as to whether there was even a rifle present at the scene. The medical examiners press conference seemed very rehearsed when it came to questions about the weapons used.

Absolutely. A freeper or two has mentioned to me that they personally saw footage of cops removing a rifle from the trunk of a car. When things like this happen, folks should turn on their DVR, and have it recording all day long, so nothing gets lost.I Wasn't in a position to do so, or I would have.

106 posted on 01/09/2013 6:42:11 AM PST by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

False Flag = nutjob.

I figured the guy had to be a 9/11 nutter.


107 posted on 01/09/2013 6:43:57 AM PST by AppyPappy (You never see a massacre at a gun show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

You don’t understand the role of the media. The role of the media in the story is to craft the story to push an agenda. If the pictures don’t tell their story, you don’t get to see them. The media wants you to forget about the crazy Aspie kid and focus on the guns. That’s why you see more about the gun than the kid, no focus on motive or drug use. They don’t show the video because it focuses on the kid.
The gun caused the tragedy. That’s the story to tell. You don’t need a “false flag” to tell it. Just use the story you have.


108 posted on 01/09/2013 6:47:41 AM PST by AppyPappy (You never see a massacre at a gun show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Absolutely. A freeper or two has mentioned to me that they personally saw footage of cops removing a rifle from the trunk of a car.

I wish they would produce the video. The only video I've seen is of cops removing a shotgun, not a rifle, from the trunk.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLrxSgkqJQc

109 posted on 01/09/2013 6:48:07 AM PST by Sirius Lee (Get your hair clippers, Patriots! The Vichy Republicans asked for it. 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
They had names, organizations, but the intel was stovepiped (still) by the Gorelick Memo, which forbade sharing of information between agencies. Able Danger had more, but couldn't share with the FBI who couldn't share with the CIA, etc.

The SIGINT told them something was up, but they had more than just that.

Policies put in place by the criminal Clinton administration's minions, to protect their masters. So in practice, they had a lot of disconnected stuff from several sources, but no one analyst could simply look at all the available data and make the connection. The way you stated it makes it sound as though you believe that it was deliberately ignored to permit the attack to be completed. Please forgive me if I'm not reading you correctly.

110 posted on 01/09/2013 6:53:22 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
You are forgiven. I wasn't blaming the GWB administration for the stovepiping, except that they did not remove the effects of the Gorelick Memo earlier on. Sometimes little decisions have sweeping consequences.

As for deliberately ignored...Let me put it this way.

There is a certain amount of cognitive inertia present in any organization. The Bakken Fromation was well known and had even been produced in vertical wells in a few locations. Many of us urged oil companies to check it out further for decades prior to eventual horizontal drilling, not in the shale itself (done in the 1980s) but in the Middle of the formation where there are different, inherently porous but low-permeability rock types.

Finally, some smaller oil companies took that look, and the result has been over 600,000 BOPD of production and growing, and billions of dollars in economic development and profit. Overcoming the "way we have always done things" and conventional wisdom are difficult.

If you had intel prior to 9/11, having been told that Flight 800 was a "center fuel tank explosion" and not a terrorist act, that the Egyptian flight which was supposedly the act of single suicidal jihadi wasn't dodging a missile, would the concept that someone might use an airliner as a guided missile occur to you?

You'd get the "Yeah, right" horselaugh and comments about reading too much Tom Clancy. (In one of Clancy's books prior to 9/11, an airliner was crashed into the US Capitol during the State of the Union Address).

So, even if someone had figured it out, would that have been acted upon prior to 9/11?

Unlikely.

If you are going to stay one step ahead of an enemy who thinks outside the box, you'd better be able to think out there, too, or you are going to fail.

111 posted on 01/09/2013 12:07:35 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf
Are you inferring a homicidal maniac didn't kill 20 children and 6 adults at the elementary school?

The only thing I was inferring by that sentence was that Holder has sworn these officers to 'secrecy' about the whole incident.

112 posted on 01/09/2013 12:27:31 PM PST by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
The only thing I was inferring by that sentence was that Holder has sworn these officers to 'secrecy' about the whole incident.

Do you in fact have evidence supporting that inference? From what I saw on the news, there were dozens, possibly hundreds of first responders, administrators, etc., on scene. I firmly believe there are too many good people in this world not to say or leak information if there were anything amiss with the Newtown story as we know it. I would certainly be interested.

113 posted on 01/09/2013 12:56:10 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (Carry a Gun, It's a Lighter Burden Than Regret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf
Do you in fact have evidence supporting that inference?

Only the fact that he visited them in a closed meeting, and that I have yet to see one interview with any of them.

Some questions: If Adam broke into the school, shooting or breaking out the door glass, where are the pictures of this ?

It is claimed that Adam used his mother's ASSAULT rifle to kill the children. Where is this rifle? Where are pictures of it ? Where is the testimony from anyone in the school that he was carrying a rifle? What kind of weapon was removed from the trunk of the car he used ?

Why are there ABSOLUTELY NO PICTURES of the outside of the front of the school, nor is there any SURVEILLANCE VIDEO considering this was a newly built school and had an extensive VIDEO SURVEILLANCE system built in ???????????????????????????????????????????????????

114 posted on 01/09/2013 1:11:46 PM PST by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Only the fact that he visited them in a closed meeting, and that I have yet to see one interview with any of them.

Who and how many were at the closed meeting? Where was it held?

If Adam broke into the school, shooting or breaking out the door glass, where are the pictures of this ?

Who would have taken the photos? Were any media photographers allowed into or near the building?

It is claimed that Adam used his mother's ASSAULT rifle to kill the children. Where is this rifle? Where are pictures of it ?

I'm guessing the rifle is in the possession of the police authorities. Who would have taken photos of the rifle and why would they publish them? Remember, there will undoubtedly be a number of lawsuits filed against the school district.

Why are there ABSOLUTELY NO PICTURES of the outside of the front of the school,

Have you ever considered writing to the Newtown newspaper and police department for answers?

115 posted on 01/09/2013 1:48:03 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (Carry a Gun, It's a Lighter Burden Than Regret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf
Thank you for your response, and questions.

Who and how many were at the closed meeting? Where was it held?

Holder-in-Newtown-to-focus-on-gun-violence

"U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder met with first responders in Newtown following a meeting earlier in the day with Vice President Joe Biden and other law enforcement officials about a meaningful response to last week’s massacre, which left 20 children and six educators dead.

Holder did not appear publicly and the feds did not release details of his visit. His motorcade could be seen leaving an area near the Sandy Hook Elementary School building around 7:20 p.m."

Who would have taken the photos?

LE's. Media photographers.

Were any media photographers allowed into or near the building?

Into... I don't know.

Near? Well... someone took THESE photographs.

I'm guessing the rifle is in the possession of the police authorities. Who would have taken photos of the rifle and why would they publish them?

Well, somebody filmed THIS.

Police Find Long Gun In Trunk Of Car In Sandy Hook Parking Lot:

Remember, there will undoubtedly be a number of lawsuits filed against the school district.

Don't bet your life savings on it.

Have you ever considered writing to the Newtown newspaper and police department for answers?

Sure. I just don't have the money to waste on postage when I am absolutely sure they will not provide any response at all.

116 posted on 01/10/2013 9:15:38 AM PST by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Good assessment, Pappy.

Your comment seems to be a good launching point for my observation that, in addition to the drugs, video games, and all the rest, there seems to be no traction given to the idea that almost all the aggressive violence involving guns in motion pictures comes from the leftist movie industry.

Do leftist “experts” believe that these thousands of repeated visual promptings have no effect on susceptible minds? Where’s the leftist push to limit such aggressive use of weaponry in motion pictures, now and over the years, in light of Newtown? /rhetoric

Violence in the movies and TV shows, even the ones we all enjoy, do much more to condition our thought processes than authorities, and we, are admitting. It’s not merely “entertainment”.


117 posted on 01/10/2013 9:51:04 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Well, somebody filmed THIS. Police Find Long Gun In Trunk Of Car In Sandy Hook Parking Lot:

I notice this was recorded later that day, after the car had been moved, and apparently in the dark of night.
118 posted on 01/10/2013 9:58:52 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Bumparooskie.


119 posted on 01/10/2013 10:03:16 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; Resettozero

Perhaps THIS will fill in some of the blanks.

The Sandy Hook Massacre: Unanswered Questions
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2976846/posts


120 posted on 01/10/2013 12:43:03 PM PST by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson