Skip to comments.
Iowa Lawmaker: Ban Semi-Automatic Weapons, Then 'Start Taking Them' From Gun Owners if Needed
The Blaze ^
| 1/8/13
| Erica Ritz
Posted on 01/08/2013 9:43:45 AM PST by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
How about banning gun-grabbers?
1
posted on
01/08/2013 9:43:51 AM PST
by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2
posted on
01/08/2013 9:44:48 AM PST
by
Nachum
(Back on the Google blacklist- www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
I see the problem.
He's a state assemblyman, but he thinks he's a commissar.
What an oxygen thief.
3
posted on
01/08/2013 9:46:47 AM PST
by
wideawake
To: Nachum
A NOTHING Iowa “Legistator” from a MORE NOTHING “District”!
4
posted on
01/08/2013 9:47:23 AM PST
by
US Navy Vet
(Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
To: Nachum
We cant have those running around out here. Those are not hunting weapons.
Uhhhh, semi-auto rifles have been the most common "hunting weapons" for about 100 years now.
To: Nachum
Time to ship that Nazi back home.
6
posted on
01/08/2013 9:49:04 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Surely there is a “Henry Bowman” in rural Iowa with a hog farm that can accomodate this critter?
7
posted on
01/08/2013 9:50:48 AM PST
by
DCBryan1
(Look for the UNION label.....then buy something else!)
To: Nachum
We cannot have big guns out here as far as the big guns that are out here, the semi-automatics and all of them, Muhlbauer said. We cant have those running around out here. Those are not hunting weapons. We first ban idiot legislators.
8
posted on
01/08/2013 9:52:06 AM PST
by
Red Steel
To: Nachum
Second Amendment says nothing about hunting. The Second Amendment is implying more about gun confisticators.
9
posted on
01/08/2013 9:52:09 AM PST
by
Starstruck
(Obama is now proposing a bottomless pit off the fiscal cliff. Enjoy the ride.)
To: Nachum
10
posted on
01/08/2013 9:54:25 AM PST
by
pabianice
(washington, dc ..)
To: Starstruck
These Demrat simpletons can’t read.
11
posted on
01/08/2013 9:54:43 AM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Looting the future to bribe the present)
To: Nachum
Yesterday, my newly elected Rep. Rick Nolan, said he backs the 2nd Amendment, but no one needs an “assault rifle” to hunt ducks.
It’s pretty obvious that none of these supposed “2A backers” has ever READ THE 2nd AMENDMENT, let alone the Constitution they swore, under oath, to support and defend.
Chip Cravaack, we need you back!
12
posted on
01/08/2013 9:55:17 AM PST
by
Fireone
(Impeach and imprison, NOW! Treason and murder are still crimes.)
To: Nachum
“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Selecting certain “arms” and banning the selling, ownership and use of them INFRINGES upon our rights.
“Unconstitutional laws are not laws” - Joshua Boston
13
posted on
01/08/2013 9:55:57 AM PST
by
ryan71
(Water, food and ammo.)
To: Nachum
I think we need to start taking them Who is "we" Dan? You? Our gov't representatives? The people that work for us? Why don't you go ahead and give it a start
14
posted on
01/08/2013 9:56:28 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Nachum
Like I have said before about there anti-gun tough guys. They need to get down and do the dirty work themselves.
These politicians, union organizers, college professors. Leave your jobs, put on the Kevlar yourselves, grab a shotgun and start going door to door. Why should the police have to take the risks for your ideas? Get some trigger time yourselves, pussies. Talk is cheap when you are in a protected government office building with armed guards.
We are waitng for the show.
15
posted on
01/08/2013 9:56:51 AM PST
by
Lockbar
(Quality Factory Loaded Ammunition ------ The New Gold)
To: Nachum
On one hand they think guns do so much damage that guns should be banned. On the other hand, they don’t think those same guns won’t do them damage if they try to “take” them.
16
posted on
01/08/2013 9:57:59 AM PST
by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
To: Nachum
The problem with “taking” assault weapons is that all the bullets come first.
17
posted on
01/08/2013 9:58:04 AM PST
by
struggle
(http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
To: Nachum
That’s it. Building a border fence between IA and MO sounds better and better all the time.
To: Nachum
19
posted on
01/08/2013 9:58:50 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
To: Red Steel
Roger that.
As for the idiot’s comments, here’s my take. Those guns don’t run around out there. They must be carried everywhere they go by a human. It is not the fault of that inanimate gun if the human uses it for immoral or unlawful purposes. As for his ‘those are not hunting weapons’ remark, well, I guess it just depends upon what you’re hunting. An AR or AK may not be the prime choice for hunting squirrels, rabbits, pheasant, or gophers but if it’s all you got, you just have to shoot more of them to have some meat left to eat.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson