Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judith Miller: Benghazi Probe a “Mess”
Newsmax ^ | Wednesday, 09 Jan 2013 04:42 PM | Jim Meyers and Kathleen Walter

Posted on 01/09/2013 4:44:50 PM PST by Olog-hai

Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Judith Miller tells Newsmax that the U.S. probe into the killing of American diplomatic personnel in Benghazi is a “mess.” …

Asked why there hasn’t been more progress in the case, Miller says: “I worry that a pre-9/11 mindset is slipping back into the consciousness of the American people and also the government that they have elected. Right now we have a situation in which you have a CIA nominee, John Brennan, who is known to be one of the officials who resists linking ‘Islamist’ and ‘terrorist’ in the same sentence. We have a president who bends over backwards to say that this is not terrorism in many instances, but violent extremist activity. We are slipping into a ‘let’s prosecute them after an event’ rather than ‘prevent the attack’ mentality.” …

Miller comments: “I hope we begin to have some of the questions about Benghazi answered that many journalists, or not enough journalists, have been asking about why four Americans died in Libya. This information should have been made available to the Congress long before now. It should have been made available to the American people before they voted in the election. It’s really kind of mind-boggling at a time when the administration is grappling with a lot of issues that require cooperation with the Congress. Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?”

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; benghazi; benghazigate; dhimmitude; judithmiller; libya; waronterror

1 posted on 01/09/2013 4:44:55 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
Why? Because he is guilty of murder. THAT'S why.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

2 posted on 01/09/2013 4:49:13 PM PST by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
Why? Because he is guilty of murder. THAT'S why.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

3 posted on 01/09/2013 4:50:15 PM PST by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?” …

Gee, Judith, why?


4 posted on 01/09/2013 4:50:23 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?”

Because he knows he is going to get away with it.

5 posted on 01/09/2013 4:50:54 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

[Found before a crumbling statue of Tyrant-Emperor-by-Trick Obama
in a glass-filled radioactive desert,
now comprising what was once known as the ‘America’]


"We first heard of an undocumented man named Obama ,
Who denied all the confusion with a Kenyan and Osama.
But at every turn, he worked to have our country defeated,
With every enemy and disaster, he conspired to have us deleted,
Sneered he, 'Death panels are too slow, so we'll use MANPADS to kill ya'."

6 posted on 01/09/2013 4:51:39 PM PST by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Hey Judith, are you really looking in the right places or are you playing by the demokrat MSM rules?


7 posted on 01/09/2013 4:57:04 PM PST by 353FMG ( I refuse to specify whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Democrats would love for America to have a pre-9/11 mindset, it will make it easier for an attack, then, they can take away more of our rights and freedoms, allowing for them to complete the transformation of the US into a police state, thanks RINOs and the Bushes, you all helped the Dem fascists!


8 posted on 01/09/2013 5:02:29 PM PST by IslamE (epiphany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
You know, reelecting Obama might have a silver lining.

If more information on Benghazi and other nefarious deeds this administration has committed comes out, Obama may just go down in popular history as the worst president ever. This would bode well for more patriotic Americans.

I know, they'll try their best to cover for him, but there's only so much lipstick you can put on a pig.

9 posted on 01/09/2013 5:09:55 PM PST by Crucial (Tolerance at the expense of equal treatment is the path to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I'm wondering if the 37 survivors evacuated from the compound that no one seems able to interview were PRISONERS. Perhaps that's just another dirty little secret being hidden here.
10 posted on 01/09/2013 5:16:45 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Oh, and Pulitzer prize winning journalist, Judith Miller, WAKES UP, and says the facts about Benghazi should have come out before the election. Maybe they should just give all the FReepers who were concerned about Benghazi Pulitzers but I guess we're just too far ahead of the curve.

Of course, one should never underestimate the evil liberals can inflict on you for speaking the truth.

11 posted on 01/09/2013 5:17:05 PM PST by Crucial (Tolerance at the expense of equal treatment is the path to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?”

Because the crime of High Treason carries the Death Penalty?

12 posted on 01/09/2013 5:18:03 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Good question. Also, what about the autopsies of the dead. What about the flow of arms to al Qaeda in Syria.


13 posted on 01/09/2013 5:19:24 PM PST by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It’s really kind of mind-boggling at a time when the administration is grappling with a lot of issues that require cooperation with the Congress. Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?”

******************

Complicit congress, just like with the original war without Congressional approval.


14 posted on 01/09/2013 5:42:15 PM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

...and Judith Miller continues to be a Democrat.


15 posted on 01/09/2013 6:16:24 PM PST by encm(ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Olog-hai.
Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Judith Miller tells Newsmax: "I worry that a pre-9/11 mindset is slipping back into the consciousness of the American people and also the government that they have elected. Right now we have a situation in which you have a CIA nominee, John Brennan, who is known to be one of the officials who resists linking 'Islamist' and 'terrorist' in the same sentence... This information should have been made available to the Congress long before now. It should have been made available to the American people before they voted in the election. It's really kind of mind-boggling at a time when the administration is grappling with a lot of issues that require cooperation with the Congress. Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?"
Because elections have consequences, as do Partisan Media Shills.


16 posted on 01/09/2013 6:18:53 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Easy,The the Marxist in the White House does not want to admit His ambassador was a CIA agent running Guns to the Syrian Jihadist Rebels Through Turkey. Some of these Jihadists had been Fighting our troops in Iraq,Now we are arming them to Help Dump Assad,the same way we got rid Of MuBarack In Egypt and Kadafhi in Libya.
I want the Question asked what was Ambassador Stevens doing in Benghazi? You wont hear that question asked,this is all a Dog and Pony show. As soon as you hear someone refer to the House in the Residential Neighborhood where this attack took place as a mission or consulate,you know they are Lying,It was a CIA clandestine Operation in a Nondescript House,that was why there was no security,so as not to attract attention


17 posted on 01/09/2013 6:27:08 PM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?”

Good question.
The election is over and the African communist Ubama has been re-elected.. So why continue the stonewalling now?

...Unless there's a cleanup ongoing for the benefit of the rats' presumptive '16 prez candidate.

18 posted on 01/09/2013 6:32:44 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Judy is right.


19 posted on 01/09/2013 8:12:24 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Why would [Obama] continue to stonewall them on the Benghazi investigation?

Why wouldn't he?!

He knows the NYTimes and Newsweak and all the news networks are never ever ever going to demand answers, so why should he provide them?

The country really went down the shitter when the once-neutral media picked a side in the battle for our nation's soul. Late fifties or so, they began to stake their claim as tool of the leftist struggle. In the last couple of decades, they even dropped the pretense of hiding it.

FoxNews is paying a little attention to Benghazi, but really not much more than they are to Lindsey Lohan or those Kardashian chicks. And they're, allegedly, our conservative champions in the battle.

I hate to be one of those all is lost guys, but guys, all is lost.

20 posted on 01/09/2013 8:20:27 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

This country is lost unless God wants to save it.
The problem here is I don’t believe enough people are praying for it.

The American public likes to live with their heads in the sand. The reality of what is truly going on is too much for their small brains to take.

I was once blind but now I see. All of these calamities and “news alerts” are just false flags created and thrown up so the sheeple will “go softly into the night” while they take over a once great nation.

I pray we wake up.


21 posted on 01/09/2013 9:48:53 PM PST by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

Yes, we should pray. Bad times are coming.

“Pray as if everything depends upon God, but ACT as if evrything depends upon you.”


22 posted on 01/11/2013 4:31:20 PM PST by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson