Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why China’s Tu-22 bombers would represent a serious threat to U.S. Navy aircraft carriers
The Aviationist ^ | January 4, 2013 | Tyler Rogoway

Posted on 01/10/2013 12:29:16 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2013 12:29:27 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It also gives them a supersonic long range bomber.


2 posted on 01/10/2013 12:36:14 AM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

Yes TU-22 Blinder. Reading this article seems like I retro backed to 25 years ago.


4 posted on 01/10/2013 12:56:24 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

And BTW, that’s an AS-4 Kitchen missile slung underneath that TU-22 or TU-26 in the above pic.


5 posted on 01/10/2013 1:04:27 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Tu-22 is a Blinder, Tu-22M (pictured above) is a Backfire.
Despite similar designation they are completely different aircraft.
Tu-22 is absolete, Tu-22M is still a potent weapon platform.


6 posted on 01/10/2013 1:07:20 AM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Pei-ping


7 posted on 01/10/2013 1:08:30 AM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: cunning_fish; sukhoi-30mki
Indeed, the Tu-22M essencially moved the engines from pods to an internal configuration. Really very different aircraft from the Tu-22. The Tu-22 remains a medium range bomber. Any supersonic platform with that range and performance is a threat.

The Tu-160 Blackjack was the Soviet/Russian B-1A equivalent. But I’m not sure those are still in service.

9 posted on 01/10/2013 5:09:07 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
China obviously has the money to buy/steal any weapons system they desire. The questions remain do they have the skills to use them and what is their real intent?

The US is and will be in military decline due to fiscal and ideological crisis. The bigger questions may be these:

Can America continue to afford to build and deploy carriers and their associated battle groups?

Are carriers on the verge of becoming tactically obsolete due to the evolution and proliferation of military technology?

10 posted on 01/10/2013 7:27:20 AM PST by buckalfa (Tilting at Windmills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

What is critically important which NOBODY is concerned with, is we continue to send ever more of our industry to China.

Our balance of trade with China is frighteningly out of balance.

That matters a great deal. We allow China to manipulate trade, protect markets, yet we do nothing.

Something will give. Bigtime.

The current situation is completely unsustainable.


11 posted on 01/10/2013 7:37:09 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

There are about 15 or 16 Blackjacks and about 400 Backfires left in service in Russia. Both types considered strategic assets and not allowed for export by Russian government despite numerous Chinese calls.

Hundreds of Backfires were chopped under Reagan-Gorbachev arms treaties and there are still abandoned airbases in South Siberia full or ground equipment and dozens of intact surplus Backfires left for 15+ years to rot and easy for Chicom spies to harvest for technology.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nObAqf2J-As

That is a video of one of these bases. The whole facility is guarded by one security and a couple dogs. You can see planes lost a lot of parts mostly due to recyclers collecting scrap metal. Who know if there were some Chinese among visitors.


12 posted on 01/10/2013 7:37:15 AM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

There are about 15 or 16 Blackjacks and about 400 Backfires left in service in Russia. Both types considered strategic assets and not allowed for export by Russian government despite numerous Chinese calls.

Hundreds of Backfires were chopped under Reagan-Gorbachev arms treaties and there are still abandoned airbases in South Siberia full or ground equipment and dozens of intact surplus Backfires left for 15+ years to rot and easy for Chicom spies to harvest for technology.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nObAqf2J-As

That is a video of one of these bases. The whole facility is guarded by one security and a couple dogs. You can see planes lost a lot of parts mostly due to recyclers collecting scrap metal. Who know if there were some Chinese among visitors.


13 posted on 01/10/2013 7:37:23 AM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Tom Clancy described the Backfire way back in the 1980s in Red Storm Rising.
14 posted on 01/10/2013 7:43:16 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Backfire: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-22M
Blinder: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu-22

Pictures are TU-22M Backfires, which look nothing like TU-22 Blinders. How the heck did that happen?


15 posted on 01/10/2013 7:52:35 AM PST by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Blinder first flew in 1959 as a prototype, it wasn’t really tested and hasn’t proved to be a good plane but was pushed in mass-production by red airforce who wanted a supersonic medium bomber at all cost. Some 300 hundred were built while Tupolev still developed it’s design making a refined aircraft known as Tu-22M by 1967.


16 posted on 01/10/2013 8:21:11 AM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
September 2004
17 posted on 01/10/2013 9:21:43 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
"That matters a great deal. We allow China to manipulate trade, protect markets, yet we do nothing."

I agree with you 100 percent. However in the global economy China has become the world's manufacturer which is part of the new normal. International business want it this way to maximize profit and the one world government cabal desires this to level the standard of living across the globe. I believe there is no going back to protectionism and America first policies as Joe Six Pack would revolt if low priced goods became unavailable at WalMart. Others would argue that America is still number one in manufacturing if measured in productive output,and that it is in our best interest to have low skill skilled assembly be done overseas so that capital will be available to further enhance technology and productivity at home. The downside to that argument is that with fewer workers, who will be left to power the consumer driven economy and pay the ever increasing taxes that the government demands.

18 posted on 01/10/2013 9:41:45 AM PST by buckalfa (Tilting at Windmills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They are just big targets. The day of the carrier has come and gone.


19 posted on 01/10/2013 9:44:27 AM PST by bmwcyle (We have gone over the cliff and we are about to hit the bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Is anyone going to point out that these things are about as stealthy as the Hindenburg? Long, long before they get anywhere near a carrier group they will be lit up on AEGIS like a Christmas tree.


20 posted on 01/10/2013 10:45:54 AM PST by denydenydeny (Admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt one has for others.-Tocqueville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson