Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio host Michael Savage calls for 'Nationalist' third party to challenge GOP
Syracuse.com ^ | 1-11-13 | Geoff Herbert

Posted on 01/12/2013 9:25:08 AM PST by Mozilla

Conservative radio host Michael Savage spoke out against Republicans and Democrats alike on Sunday for pulling a "charade" on the American people, and called for a third political party.

"We need a Nationalist party in the United States of America," Savage said on WABC's "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio," according to WND.

The third-most widely heard talk show host, behind only Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity in ratings, explained a new, third "Nationalist" party could focus on "borders, language and culture."

"There is no Republican Party," Savage told talk show host Aaron Klein. "It's an appendage of the Democrat machine, as we've all just seen. It's two-card Monte, as we well know. It's a game being played against the American people. You've got the drunk Boehner on the one side, and the quasi-pseudo-crypto Marxist on the other, who is really just enjoying the ride in Hawaii right now, representing his factions."

(Excerpt) Read more at syracuse.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: aaronklein; gop; michaelsavage; rushlimbaugh; seanhannity; talkradio; teaparty; thirdparty
The audio host is at the site link.

The link to the article and the audio of interview

1 posted on 01/12/2013 9:25:13 AM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
It's two-card Monte, as we well know.


2 posted on 01/12/2013 9:28:10 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I would rather have an individualist party that promotes freedom and capitalism.


3 posted on 01/12/2013 9:36:27 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Just what we need, another third party. We have so few.
4 posted on 01/12/2013 9:37:06 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Don't forget this.
5 posted on 01/12/2013 9:39:56 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
It is a good interview.

Better, though, to have a "nationalist" ('borders,' 'language,' 'culture') wing rise up within the Republican Party (if that is not what the Tea Party actually is), to challenge and oust the elites.

I have never seen a list of names, compiled for public use, of those considered the "Republican Establishment."

We guess at a half dozen of them, but has any one ever compiled an actual list of the people who control the Republican Party at the top, behind the scenes ?

6 posted on 01/12/2013 9:45:58 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
has any one ever compiled an actual list of the people who control the Republican Party at the top, behind the scenes ?

The republican national committee is a good place to start making changes but its hard to get people out to state conventions where committeemen are chosen. Its a sad thing too because its probably the easiest place to make changes with only a few hundred votes.
7 posted on 01/12/2013 9:49:38 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I propose a 7th party to challenge the GOP. We’ll call it the Pseudo Nationalist Popular Peoples Independence Party. This party will be everything the Republicans aren’t. Mad the GOP doesn’t stand strong on debt? This party is for you. Upset the GOP doesn’t direct enough resources into the “good” government programs that you care about? Then the PNPPIP is for you. Pissed that the Republicans only pay lip service to social issues? Look no further than the Pseudo Nationalist Popular Peoples Independence Party! Young and irritated that the GOP is out of touch because of it’s old uncool positions on gay marriage, abortion, etc? Yup, the PNPPIP is hip and happening and has just the platform that will appeal to the new generations. This party will be so pure it will appeal to conservatives of every stripe!


8 posted on 01/12/2013 9:53:03 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Yeah because nationalist parties worked so well in the past. When can we occupy the Sudetenland?


9 posted on 01/12/2013 10:10:26 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Yeah because nationalist parties worked so well in the past. When can we occupy the Sudetenland?


10 posted on 01/12/2013 10:10:38 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I think the time is RIPE for a new party—based upon the goals of the Conservative Tea Party. The GOP has proven itself a failure—They will never win another election. the Peace/Freedom Party has a better chance today. If we are to stop the slide to Communism—a new party must be formed, and formed today.


11 posted on 01/12/2013 10:22:04 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Democrats will love it, and help in any way they can. I favor a single party. It could screw up 60 years of Socialism in one swift move.


12 posted on 01/12/2013 10:22:25 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Savage is fed up with the two party system and is saying that the republican party has failed us. There was so much that could have been said and that should have been done that the Republican party failed to do like point out the democrats and those who benefit from Obama and support him get tax breaks and they benefit from the DNC who helps them out of all their policies. So Savaing is saying that the GOP is a bunch of cowards so it is time to create a new party to over take them or challenge them. he noted that it would take several years to create and run well, about 5, he said. But basically he wants a patriotic party who defends the ideals of the founding fathers.


13 posted on 01/12/2013 10:30:04 AM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I recommend merger between the Nationalist and Socialist parties. National-Socialist party, kind of has a nice ring to it. ;)
It might even bring in the low information voters.


14 posted on 01/12/2013 10:30:04 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; an EMP confined to DC would be much appreciated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

A Nationalist party such as what Hitler brought into being?? Hmmmm Michael???? Go back to your boat and drink your wine.


15 posted on 01/12/2013 10:32:03 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks, but no thanks, Savage. This is just a shallow and transparent attempt to engineer yet another squeaker victory in 2014 and 2016 for the Demagogic Party.

Partisan Media Shills ping.

Thanks Mozilla.


16 posted on 01/12/2013 10:40:25 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Funny but that might be what the Democrats change their name to eventually the Socialist party of America.


17 posted on 01/12/2013 10:47:15 AM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pallis

“Democrats will love it, and help in any way they can. I favor a single party. It could screw up 60 years of Socialism in one swift move.”

Why stop at one new party, if it is such a great idea? Why not two, or three or more?

The left may well advance some funding for the efforts.

The left learned to stop circular firing squads, whatever their differences.

But not the right, who seem to expend most of their energy and resources criticizing each other, instead of criticizing the left.

Then there are those who benefit from the disorder, controversy, on the right. They include online and onair jounalists and commentators. Savage would be an example.


18 posted on 01/12/2013 10:51:39 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
"There is no Republican Party," Savage told talk show host Aaron Klein. "It's an appendage of the Democrat machine, as we've all just seen. It's two-card Monte, as we well know. It's a game being played against the American people. You've got the drunk Boehner on the one side, and the quasi-pseudo-crypto Marxist on the other, who is really just enjoying the ride in Hawaii right now, representing his factions."

All you Republican apologists can make fun of Savage, but every word in that paragraph is 100% true. Sad, but true.

19 posted on 01/12/2013 10:52:00 AM PST by COBOL2Java (kak-is-toc-ra-cy: Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens. See: GOP-e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

I don’t mean creating one new party. I mean all the Republicans should join the Democratic Party to form one big party. My reasoning is simple. When polled, Americans are overwhelmingly conservative in their opinions and politics, but a lot of those people are Democrats because they don’t know any better. The Democratic Party is now the majority party, and it is going to remain so, with the Republican Party becoming insignificant nationally. We can’t beat it. Join it, and destroy it from the inside out. Of course, it will never happen, but I like to dream about possibilities that could work. All I want to do is destroy the left.


20 posted on 01/12/2013 11:12:38 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Yeah, if you want to start a conservative third party, calling it the “Nationalist Party” is a pretty bad way to start things off.


21 posted on 01/12/2013 11:32:46 AM PST by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

If there is a 3rd party move, it should be the Constitution
Party.....which already exists.....

Nationalist is never a good foundation for anything.......e.g., Nationalist Socialist Party.....as in “Nazi”....

The key is in recovering/restoring the foundation....


22 posted on 01/12/2013 11:43:10 AM PST by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
two right of center political parties will guarantee a socialist/communist government forever. - best to restructure the GOP from the right to left.
23 posted on 01/12/2013 3:43:23 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
two right of center political parties will guarantee a socialist/communist government forever. - best to restructure the GOP from the right to left.
24 posted on 01/12/2013 3:43:23 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
two right of center political parties will guarantee a socialist/communist government forever. - best to restructure the GOP from the right to left.
25 posted on 01/12/2013 3:43:33 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson